Rediff news reported on May 21, 2013: Nitin Gadkari said Ambani made the request at a meeting in Mumbai during Clinton’s visit to India in March 2000, when Atal Bihari Vajpayee was the prime minister. Clinton and his delegation also had a formal event at the Mumbai Stock Exchange, at which Gadkari was present as the leader of opposition in the Maharashtra legislative council.

"Before that program, Dhirubhai met Clinton and requested him to use his good relations with Musharraf to save Sharif's life, for it was feared that Musharraf would get rid of Sharif like how Zia-ul-Haq got rid of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Dhirubhai said Sharif was his friend and that he should be allowed to live. He also told Clinton that Sharif was as good as his own countrymen because India and Pakistan were one before partition. Both his sons, Mukesh and Anil, were present then,” Gadkari said at a book release function.

One viewer of my article asks me what the use of above disclosure is now. Why did Gadkari ji remain silent 13 years? The same happened in the DLF – Vadra Scam case. Should I have also to follow the line of GadkariJi, to keep silence, not write even one sentence?

vs

The Pakistani Army mobilised its nuclear arsenal against India in 1999 — during the Kargil conflict — with the full knowledge of its then prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the Sunday Times reported May 12, 2002, quoting Bruce Riedel, who was a senior adviser to the then US President Bill Clinton on India and Pakistan.

While Clinton reminded Sharif how closes the US and Soviet Union had come to nuclear war in 1962 over Cuba, Sharif agreed it would be a catastrophe even if a single bomb was dropped.

John Pike, director of the Washington-based Global Security Organisation, said intelligence channels could have become aware of the trucks that carry Pakistan’s nuclear missiles being moved from their bases at Sargodha, near Rawalpindi.

When Mr Sharif visited Washington in 1999 to discuss Kargil with Mr Clinton, he said, “I am prepared to help resolve the current crisis in Kargil but India must commit to resolve the larger issue in a specific time-frame,” former US deputy secretary of State Strobe Talbott writes in his new book Engaging India — Diplomacy, Democracy and the Bomb.

“Clinton came as close as I had ever seen to blowing up in a meeting with a foreign leader, and told Sharif: ‘If I were the Indian Prime Minister, I would never do that. I would be crazy to do it. It would be nuclear blackmail. If you proceed with this line, I will have no leverage with them.’

“‘I am not — and the Indians are not — going to let you get away with blackmail, and I will not permit any characterisation of this meeting that suggests I am giving in to blackmail,’” Mr Talbott recounts Mr Clinton as reacting. Mr Clinton also refuted Mr Sharif’s accusation that the Indians were the instigators of the crisis and the intransigents in the ongoing standoff.

When Mr Sharif insisted he had to have something to show for his trip to the US beyond unconditional surrender over Kargil, Mr Clinton pointed to the dangers of nuclear war if Pakistan did not return to its previous positions. Seeing they were getting nowhere, Mr Clinton told Mr Sharif he had a statement ready to release to press that would lay all the blame for the crisis on Pakistan. “Sharif was ashen. 

Nuke in Kargil : Shivaji and Shastri

vs

Boston is a city where blasting happened by two brothers, one is dead and another is in police custody there. Boston Air Port is the place where Rahul Gandhi was detained in 2001 and now Azam Khan has been detained. Modi’s VISA was cancelled by the US.

A suit had been filed on March 8, 2005 by four lawyers in the high court seeking information about the alleged detention of Congress MP Rahul Gandhi with Italian passport and his Colombian girlfriend by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 2001. According to the public interest litigation, Gandhi, the son of Congress president Sonia Gandhi, and his companion were released after being detained at Boston airport with illegal possession of about $200,000 following the intervention of the Prime Minister's Office. At that time, Atal Bihari Vajpayee was the Indian prime minister and Brijesh Mishra was a chief of PMO. Brijesh Mishra’s daughter married with an Italian and lived in Italy. Approach through this channel might be the reason of initiative was taken by Brijesh Mishra.  

Comment may be sent at: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

Sacked iGate CEO Phaneesh Murthy IITian and MBA-A has denied charges of sexual harassment against him and said it's a case of extortion. "There is no merit to the sexual harassment claim. The charges are completely false. They have an easy way to collect money. It's the same lawyer and law firm who represented the other woman in 2002 (when Murthy was charged with similar allegations when he was in Infosys). Now, do you think the odds are different," he said in a media conference call.Is iGate CEO Phaneesh Murthy going in the line of Bill Clinton?

Said woman of 2002 is Reka Maximovitch.  

Réka Katalin Maximovitch said about herself:

Tagline

I am a First generation American of Hungarian and Russian descent from my mother and father's lineage, respectively..

Introduction

I am a devoted mother to my 9 year old American Mustang, Carson and 3 year old Shepherd, Tango.  My horse and I have been on a spiritual journey learning Parelli natural horsemanship together through the home study DVD series, since I adopted him from Fox Hog herd in Washoe County, NE about 6 years ago.  My shepherd is a rescue from the Oakland SPCA and has enriched my life by revealing that behavioral counseling approaches and interventions may be beneficial when applied to animals who have had negative experiences.

Bragging rights

My geneology is traceable to the 1100s on my mother's side of the family. There are no existing documents of my ancestors on my father's side of the family from the ex-Soviet Union.

He holds a B.Tech degree from IIT Madras and an MBA degree from IIM Ahmedabad.

Réka Katalin Maximovitch, Ph.D. Psychology, CCHT, M.P.A., B.A.
Consultation and Support for your Situation
Oakland, CA 94605
Mobile: (510) 610-7948
E-mail: rmaximovitch9@gmail.com

Self Employed (Business)

Counselor · Jun 2001 to present

Volunteer crisis counselor for the 24-hour crisis intervention and suicide prevention hotline. Assessed for suicidality and provided general phone counseling for clients with severe mental illnesses, situational crises, second party calls, individuals with suicidal or homicidal ideation and grief counseling. Provide face-to-face counseling for the senior population as part of the Senior In-Home Counseling Program on issues of grief, bereavement and depression assessment. Trained volunteers, MFT, Psy.D, and Ph.D. interns.

Memberships and Honors
National Association of Professional Women (NAPW) January 2012
Parelli Natural Horsemanship Home Study DVD Program February 2008-Present
American Psychological Association (APA): January 2006
Division 12 (Society of Clinical Psychology) 
Section III: The Society for a Science of Clinical Psychology
Section IX: Assessment
Division 55 (Advancement of Pharmacotherapy)

The Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback January 2006
Universal Life Church, Credentials of Ministry May 2004

Graduated from Berkeley High School (Berkeley, California)

Pi Alpha Alpha, The National Honor Society for Public Affairs and April 1997
Administration
Pi Sigma Alpha, The National Political Science Honor Society March 1997

Profile of iGate Controvercial CEO Phaneesh Murthy: Scamsgate in Congress vs Sexgate in IT

News about the sacking of iGagate CEO Phaneesh Murthy by the company itself comes through media on May 21, 2013.

One week before news of about Infosys’s attack on its former director Phaneesh Murthy is published at siliconindia on May 13, 2013:

 Indian IT major Infosys Technologies Monday hit out at former director Phaneesh Murthy, saying he should have proved his proclaimed innocence in a sexual harassment case by fighting it instead of opting to settle out of court.

In a point-by-point response to Phaneesh's statement on the case, the Nasdaq-listed Indian bluechip fielded its counsel and head of its legal department, R. Nityanandan, to term all the charges made by Phaneesh as "blatantly false".

"If Phaneesh believed he was innocent and wanted to clear his name, he should have stayed in the lawsuit by himself and defended his position. We had given him this option. Instead of fighting to clear his name, he elected to settle," the company said in a statement issued late Monday.

Infosys agreed to pay $3 million in an out of court settlement with Reka Maximovitch, who had brought sexual harassment charges against Phaneesh, then the company's director.

The company also reserved its right to proceed against Phaneesh if "deemed necessary".

The company statement said it was willing to settle with Maximovitch without Phaneesh.

But the former director agreed to Infosys having the right to sue him for all his actions and lack of contribution, and that he would have no recourse to insurance if Infosys decided to sue him and the company would not be bound by confidentiality with respect to the settlement.

Phaneesh was initially reluctant to sign the settlement, but "came back voluntarily and agreed to every condition that Infosys had set".

In a statement from California, Phaneesh had gone on record Sunday to say that there was no financial contribution from him to the settlement with Maximovitch because a settlement was not his preferred route.

Phaneesh also claimed Infosys had opted for the settlement because its American Depository Receipts (ADR) issue was coming up soon.

Nithyanandan said: "As has been stated, Infosys settled this matter because it believed it was in the best interests of the company to do so. The company has disclosed in all its SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) filings as early as October 2002 that the case with Reka may materially impact the earnings of the company."

"As the company had already disclosed the risk in its filings there is no connection between the settlement and the proposed ADR offering. This case was settled on April 25, 2003, as the depositions were to start on the same day. A reading of the many public filings in this case would bring forth the grave nature of the allegations made against Phaneesh," the statement said.