News Analysis India

Share your experiences

Bukharis who dances with anti-Modi lobby should read panic words of Maulana Azad



Bukharis who dances with anti-Modi lobby should read panic words of Maulana Azad

Tag: mam Syed Bukhari dances Congress, Bukhari daces with Ant-Modi lobby, Maulana Azad, Saadar Vallabh Bhai Patel, Gandhi, Nehru, Congress President

Tweets at twitter:7h: @Sinceere_Angel @truevirathindu Babar neither born nor his grave in India but his najaya aulads bukhari barks:newsanalysisindia.com/post/death-fla

Suresh C Tripathi, मित्र and Dr.Maheshwar.Dutt retweeted you 22h: @Dr_M_Dutt In coming Delhi assembly election voters should punish anti-national Bukhari ‘,s supporting hand & broom:newsanalysisindia.com/post/bukhari-s

Rakesh bhambri, Chiru Bhat and  कटुआ फकीर। retweeted you22h: @The__Chauvinist @PontiFukEx Communal bloody handed Congress has danced with Imam Bukhari:

Dr.Maheshwar.Dutt retweeted your Tweets 22h: @Dr_M_Dutt In coming Delhi assembly election voters should punish anti-national Bukhari ‘,s supporting hand & broom:newsanalysisindia.com/post/bukhari-s

The very same Maulana Azad, who had always been considered a great friend and confidante of Jawaharlal and who had issued a statement on 26th April 1946 to elect Nehru as Congress President, wrote in his autobiography, published posthumously in 1959:

“After weighting the pros and cans I came to the conclusion that the election of Sardar Patel would not be desirable in the existing circumstances. Taking all facts into consideration it seemed to me that Jawaharlal should be the new President….

“I acted according to my best judgment but the way things have shaped since then has made to realize that this was perhaps the greatest blunder of my political life. I have regretted no action of mine so much as the decision to withdraw form the Presidentship of the Congress at this junction. It was a mistake which I can describe in Gandhi’s words as the one of Himalayan dimension.

“My second mistake was that when I decided not to stand myself, I did not support Sardar Patel. We differed on many issues but I am convinced that if he had succeeded me as Congress President he would have seen that the Cabinet Mission Plan was successfully implemented. He would have never committed the mistake of Jawaharlal which gave Mr. Jinnah an opportunity of sabotaging the Plan. I can never forgive myself when I think that if I had not committed these mistakes, perhaps the history of the last ten years would have been different.”16

Looking back to all those tumultuous years Rajagopalachari, who had all the reasons to be angry, unhappy and uncharitable to Sardar Patel because it was Patel who deprived Rajaji the first Presidentship of India, wrote almost 22 years after Patel’s death:

“When the independence of India was coming close upon us and Gandhiji was the silent master of our affairs, he had come to the decision that Jawaharlal, who among the Congress leaders was the most familiar with foreign affairs, should be the Prime Minister of India, although he knew Vallabhbhai would be the best administrator among them all…

“Undoubtedly it would have been better if Nehru had been asked to be the Foreign Minister and Patel made the Prime Minister. I too fell into the error of believing that Jawaharlal was the more enlightened person of the two… A myth had grown about Patel that he would be harsh towards Muslims. This was a wrong notion but it was the prevailing prejudice.”

Related articles:

Who stabbed in the back of Loh Pursh?

Bukhari should be declared proclaimed offfender: Posters in support of Sharif by Keral Cong with Muslim League

Latest articles related to my book: “Accursed (Sunanda) & Jihadi Neighbour”:

First Chapter of my forthcoming book titled "Accursed & Jihadi neighbour"

Chapter-2: Accursed Sunanda & Jihadi Neighbour: Death flames touche 5 Star Leela to Hotel Aman ..Accursed-Sunanda

PREFACE of the book titled “Accursed and Jihadi Neighbour”

Synopsis of Book “Accursed (Sunanda) & Jihadi Neighbour

Sunanda’s cousin endorsed today the facts finding of “Accursed & Jihadi Neighbour” book

Sunanda’s murder relates to India’s security beyond Tharoor Menon: Synopsis – Accursed & Jihadi Neighbour

.......contd


For following you may also log on at: www.shoppingkendra.com/

[Book Available: Cash On Delivery Payment (Without courier charges) Only if order will be for boks Rs. 250/ + 125/ + CD 75/- at a time]

Copy Right of  the both books is is obtained by the author.

(1)

Book: Accursed & Jihadi Neighbur

Language: Englishi, 

Size: 9”x5.5”                

Pages 202

Book in hard bound cover:  Price: Rs.250- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

For Sending advance: SBI bank Accunt No. - 32782960008

                                     IFS Code SBIN0060301

Author: Premendra AgrawaL

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

Stationery House

Behind Sindhi School,

Ramsagarpara,

Raipur-492001 (C.G.)

Mobile: 0942507574

Web: http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/

 

 (2)

DLF-Vadra: Bhrasht Tantra: Book in Hindi

Language: Hindi, 

Size: 9”x5.5”                

Pages 100

Book in hard bound cover:  Price: Rs.125- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

For Sending advance: SBI bank Accunt No. - 32782960008

                                     IFS Code SBIN0060301

Author: Premendra AgrawaL

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

Stationery House

Behind Sindhi School,

Ramsagarpara,

Raipur-492001 (C.G.)

Mobile: 0942507574

Web: http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/


(3)


CD of Book published in 2012: 

Silent Assassins, Jan 11, 1966 (Assassins of Shastri)

CD Rs 75/- Courier packing charges Rs 50/-

Book Rs 500/-

Language: Englishi, 

Size: 9”x5.5”                

Pages 440

*

You may visit us at:

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/newsanalysisindia

https://www.facebook.comac/premendra.agrawal

https://twitter.com/newsanalysisind

https://t witter.com/thechanshattisgarh



Recent most viewedul:

Read Book by clicking here: Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966

AAP’s Yogendra Yadav Political Guru of Rahul Gandhi: Maoists invade Congress

Ford Foundation of o a Italian village: Donation to Kejriwal who never utter against Sonia?

SUPREME COURT ON HINDU HINDUTVA AND HINDUISM

पढ़िएवाजपेयीजीकी२७कवितायेँ : Read 27 Poems of Atal Bihari Vajpayee:Ji

www.shoppingkendra.com/

Who stabbed in the back of Loh Pursh?


We should welcome the Speaking of our beloved Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the "Run for Unity" to mark Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel's birth anniversary - "Our own people were murdered; the attack was not on a particular community but on the entire nation. It was like a dagger pierced through India's chest."

Three Pictures which should be eer one's memory: 
Loh Purush Patel with Nizam, Gandhi with Jinnah, Nehru with Sheikh Abdullah





Tag: 31 October, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel, Prime Minister Modi, Run of Unity, Netaji Bose, Congress president, Kriplani, Loh Purush Patel with Nizam, Gandhi with Jinnah, Nehru with Sheikh Abdullah

 

If we turn the pages of history then a question stand before us: Who stabbed in the back of Loh Purush Sardar Patel?

This also happened with the Subhash Chandra Bose:

Gandhi showed condolence before Netaji S C Bose’s death!!

Who killed Netaji?

Dear Mr. Attlee:

I understand from a reliable source that Subhas Chandra Bose, your war criminal, has been allowed to enter Russian territory by Stalin. This is a clear treachery and betrayal of faith by the Russians. AsRussia has been an ally of the British-Americans, it should not have been done. Please take note of it and do what you consider proper and fit.

Yours sincerely, 
Jawaharlal Nehru

*

By 1946, it had become quite clear that India’s independence was only a matter of time now. The Second World War had come to an end and the British rulers had started thinking in terms of transferring power to Indians. An interim government was to be formed which was to be headed by the Congress president as Congress had won the maximum number of seats in the 1946 elections. All of a sudden, the post of Congress president became very crucial as it was this very person who was going to become the first Prime Minister of independent India.

At that time, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was the president of Congress party. In fact, he was the president for the last six years as elections could not be held for the Congress president’s post since 1940 due to Quit India movement, the Second World War and the fact that most of the leaders were behind bars. 


Azad was also interested in fighting and winning election for  the Congress president’s post  as he, too, had ambitions to become the PM,  but he was told in no uncertain terms by Mahatma Gandhi that he does not approve of a second term for a sitting Congress president and Azad had to fall in line ,albeit reluctantly. Not only this, Gandhi made it very clear to everybody that Nehru was his preferred choice for the Congress president’s position.

Despite Gandhiji’s open support for Jawaharlal Nehru, the Congress Party overwhelmingly wanted Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel as the Congress President and consequently the first Prime Minister of India, because it considered Patel as ‘a great executive, organizer and leader”4 with his feet firmly the on the ground.

The last date for the nominations for the post of the President of Congress, and thereby the first Prime Minister of India, was April 29, 1946. Let us not forget that by this time Gandhiji had already made his choice widely known. Still 12 out of 15 Pradesh Congress Committees, the only legal bodies having power to nominate and elect President of the Party, nominated Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. The remaining three may not have nominated Patel but then they did not nominate anyone else also including Jawaharlal Nehru. Thus, no Pradesh Congress Committee proposed the name of Jawaharlal Nehru even on the last day of filing the nominations i.e. April 29, 1946.

J.B Kripalani took the lead in finding the proposers and seconders for Nehru’s candidacy, in deference to Gandhi’s wishes, during the Working Committee meeting on 29.04.1946 in New Delhi. Kripalani succeeded in getting a few Working Committee members and local members of AICC to propose Nehru’s name for the post.6 Though, Gandhiji knew Jawaharlal’s nomination almost missed the April 29 deadline, and also even he could not get at least one Pradesh Congress Committee, the only legitimate body entitled to elect the President of the Congress, to nominate Jawaharlal.

Let me here to remind one historic incident whis is knocking still in my mind: Late Acharya Kriplani former President of Indian National Congress contested as an independent from Raipur in 1967. However, he was defeated by Congress candidate Lakhanlal Gupta by a margin of more than 24,000 votes. Lakhan Lal Gupta’s eleder brother Manrakhan Lal Gupta and his cousin were known to me.

However once Nehru was formally proposed by a few Working Committee members, efforts began to persuade Sardar Patel to withdraw his nomination in favour of Jawaharlal. Patel sought Gandhiji’s advice who in turn asked him to do so and “Vallabhbhai did so at once.”8 But it must be mentioned that before advising Patel to withdraw Gandhiji had given enough hint to Nehru to allow the legitimate nomination of Sardar Patel to go through the process. Gandhiji said to Nehru: “No PCC has put forward your name....only [afew members of] working committee has”

This remark of Gandhiji was met by Jawaharlal with “complete silence”. Only after Gandhiji was informed that “Jawaharlal will not take the second place” he asked Patel to withdraw. Dr. Rajendra Prasad lamented that Gandhiji “had once again sacrificed his trusted lieutenant for the sake of the ‘glamorous Nehru’ and further feared that “Nehru would follow the British ways.”

When Rajendra Prasad was using the phrase “once again” he indeed was referring to the denial of Presidentship of the Congress party to Patel in the years 1929, 1937 and 1946 in preference to Nehru. Let it also be mentioned that Prasad was not the only person to complain about Gandhiji “sacrificing his trusted lieutenant for the sake of the glamorous Nehru.” There were many others as well. But Gandhiji took the decision because he was convinced that “Jawaharlal will not take a second place but by giving Jawaharlal the first place India would not be deprived of Patel’s services and the both will be like two oxen yoked to the Governmental cart. One will need other and both will pull together”.

Sardar Patel was close to 71 when all this drama was unfolding. Patel knew that this was the only chance he could get to lead the country. Nehru, then 56 only, still had age with him. Despite all this Patel accepted to take a second position because of two reasons: firstly, for Patel post or position was immaterial. Service to the motherland was more important; and secondly, Nehru was keen that “either he would take the number one spot in the Government or stay out. Vallabhbhai also reckoned that whereas office was likely to moderate Nehru, rejection would drive him into opposition. Patel shrank from precipitating such an outcome, which would bitterly divide India.”

Looking back to all those tumultuous years Rajagopalachari, who had all the reasons to be angry, unhappy and uncharitable to Sardar Patel because it was Patel who deprived Rajaji the first Presidentship of India, wrote almost 22 years after Patel’s death: “When the independence of India was coming close upon us and Gandhiji was the silent master of our affairs, he had come to the decision that Jawaharlal, who among the Congress leaders was the most familiar with foreign affairs, should be the Prime Minister of India, although he knew Vallabhbhai would be the best administrator among them all…

“Undoubtedly it would have been better if Nehru had been asked to be the Foreign Minister and Patel made the Prime Minister. I too fell into the error of believing that Jawaharlal was the more enlightened person of the two… A myth had grown about Patel that he would be harsh towards Muslims. This was a wrong notion but it was the prevailing prejudice.” 17

Before we close this chapter let us have a look at what one of the most sympathetic biographer of Nehru, who has not hesitated to distort even the well known facts in favour of Nehru, has to say on the issue of Nehru’s elevation to the Presidentship of the Congress and the Prime Ministership of free India:

“In accordance with the time-honored practice of rotating the Presidency, Patel was in line for the post. Fifteen years had elapsed since he presided over the Karachi session where as Nehru had presided at Lucknow and Ferozpur in 1936 and 1937. Moreover, Patel was the overwhelming choice of the Provincial Congress Committees…. Nehru’s ‘election’ was due to Gandhi’s intervention. Patel was persuaded to step down.

“One month after the election the Viceroy invited Nehru, as Congress President, to form an Interim Government. If Gandhi had not intervened, Patel would have been the first de facto Premier of India, in 1946-7. Gandhi certainly knew of the impending creation of Interim Government. One must infer, therefore, that he preferred Nehru as the first Prime Minister of free India. The Sardar was ‘robbed of the prize’ and it rankled deeply. He was then seventy-one while Nehru was fifty-six; in traditionalist Indian terms the elder statesman should have been the first primer and Patel knew that because of his advanced age another opportunity would probably not arise.

“There is striking parallel with Congress election of 1929; on both occasions Gandhi threw his weight behind Nehru at the expense of Patel.”

.......contd

For following you may also log on at: www.shoppingkendra.com/

[Book Available: Cash On Delivery Payment (Without courier charges) Only if order will be for boks Rs. 250/ + 125/ + CD 75/- at a time]

Copy Right of  the both books is is obtained by the author.

(1)

Book: Accursed & Jihadi Neighbur

Language: Englishi, 

Size: 9”x5.5”                

Pages 202

Book in hard bound cover:  Price: Rs.250- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

For Sending advance: SBI bank Accunt No. - 32782960008

                                     IFS Code SBIN0060301

Author: Premendra AgrawaL

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

Stationery House

Behind Sindhi School,

Ramsagarpara,

Raipur-492001 (C.G.)

Mobile: 0942507574

Web: http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/

 

 (2)

DLF-Vadra: Bhrasht Tantra: Book in Hindi

Language: Hindi, 

Size: 9”x5.5”                

Pages 100

Book in hard bound cover:  Price: Rs.125- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

For Sending advance: SBI bank Accunt No. - 32782960008

                                     IFS Code SBIN0060301

Author: Premendra AgrawaL

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

Stationery House

Behind Sindhi School,

Ramsagarpara,

Raipur-492001 (C.G.)

Mobile: 0942507574

Web: http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/


(3)


CD of Book published in 2012: 

Silent Assassins, Jan 11, 1966 (Assassins of Shastri)

CD Rs 75/- Courier packing charges Rs 50/-

Book Rs 500/-

Language: Englishi, 

Size: 9”x5.5”                

Pages 440

*

You may visit us at:

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/newsanalysisindia

https://www.facebook.comac/premendra.agrawal

https://twitter.com/newsanalysisind

https://t witter.com/thechanshattisgarh



Recent most viewedul:

Read Book by clicking here: Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966

AAP’s Yogendra Yadav Political Guru of Rahul Gandhi: Maoists invade Congress

Ford Foundation of o a Italian village: Donation to Kejriwal who never utter against Sonia?

SUPREME COURT ON HINDU HINDUTVA AND HINDUISM

पढ़िएवाजपेयीजीकी२७कवितायेँ : Read 27 Poems of Atal Bihari Vajpayee:Ji

www.shoppingkendra.com/