Obama chewing nicotine gum and Salman Khan with unlit cigarette


Tags: Obama chewing gum, nicotine gum, Obama chain smoker, Salman Khan, Salman with Unlit cigarette, Priyanka Gandhi, Prety Zinta, 66 Republic Day, Narendra Modi, U.S. president

Obama chewing nicotine gum and Salman Khan with unlit cigarette

Barack Obama is getting “chewed out” by critics, but that hasn’t stopped the president from chewing gum during his trip to China and now in India.

CVS Health pulled cigarettes, cigars and other tobacco products from its store shelves last year, a move that was applauded by Obama, a former smoker often seen chewing nicotine gum.  While sitting next to India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi to watch the 66 Republic Day parade, the U.S. president sought to ease his obvious boredom by chewing a bit of gum.

My two news articles:    (1)

(1) Should Priyanka Gandhi learn from Salman Khan who pours a drink but never takes a sip & hold an unlit cigarette in his hand?

According to the Times of India veteran Bollywood scriptwriter Salim Khan has revealed his son Salman Khan hasn’t had an alcoholic drink and neither have smoked once over the past three years. Salman, who had undergone a surgery in 2011 after suffering from trigeminal neuralgia, was advised by doctors to refrain from drinking and smoking.

(2) Should Ness Wadao and Preity Zinta learn from Salman Khan who holds an unlit cigarette in his hand?

HT reported today Bollywood actor Preity Zinta, whohas accused industrialist Ness Wadia of molestation, has said her former boyfriend had thrown burning cigarettes at her and locked her up in a room even before the May 30 incident at Wankhede Stadium after which she filed a police complaint.

Times of India notes: Obama was slammed on social media for chewing gum at the APEC summit held in Beijing. Obama was also caught chewing gum at a World War II ceremony in France. The news outlet has taken it one step further calling his most recent incident an “ungainly sight.” Furthermore, they aren’t the only ones that seem to have noticed:

First Post reports, “[T]he president’s been a long time user of nicotine gum in his efforts to kick his smoking habit and has relied on gum to stay away from cigarettes while meeting with heads of state or summits.” However, many are still left peeved nonetheless, saying it’s unprofessional and there is no excuse.

As Mad World News reported over the weekend, Obama passed up on the honor of participating in the 70th anniversary celebration of the liberation of Auschwitz in order to travel to India for reasons still unknown. However, while there, Obama stayed true to his narcissistic and arrogant reputation by disrespecting India’s leader, and the local media is a little more than ticked.

As Obama carried out the seemingly obligatory political courtesies one must endure when visiting another country, he may have gotten a bit too comfortable. Unfortunately, this simple fix is far too complex for Obama to understand as it is not the first time world citizens have been irked by the sight of the lip smacking Commander-in-Chief.

Nicotine gum is a type of chewing gum that delivers nicotine to the body. It is used as an aid in nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), a process for smoking cessation and quitting smokeless tobacco. The nicotine is delivered to the bloodstream via absorption by the tissues of the mouth. It is currently available over-the-counter in Europe, the US and elsewhere.

Vandematram: Popes & Vivekanand : Cambridge honored Dr. Singh to close door on Sanskrit, Hindi

Vandematram: Popes and Vivekanand of 1893

30. March 2013 Premendra Agrawal (0)
When we read the news of two Popes of 21st century then we should also remind the Vivekanand of 1893 in Chicago and patriotic song “vandematram”.

March 28, 2013. Pope Francis washed the feet of a dozen inmates including Muslim woman at a juvenile detention center in a Holy Thursday ritual. The prison chaplain Capuchin Fr. Gaetano Greco told the Vatican newspaper, a young detainee from Naples “clutched his own head” and shouted, “Oh, Mother of God, the pope here!?”

Pope Benedicts: SOLEMNITY OF MARY, MOTHER OF GOD – 45th WORLD DAY OF PEACE. Dear Brothers and Sisters! On the first day of the year, the liturgy resounds in the Church throughout the world with the ancient priestly blessing that we heard during today’s first reading: “The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you, and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace”


Article (2)

Cambridge honored Dr. Singh to close door on Sanskrit, Hindi

22. November 2011 Premendra Agrawal World (0)

Article of Oct 12, 2005

Cambridge has finally closed the door on Sanskrit as a hallowed subject of undergraduate study, nearly one-and-a-half centuries after it first established a chair in the 3000 year old language.

The Times of India sought – and received – confirmation of the university’s decision within hours of Cambridge honouring Prime Minister Manmohan Singh with a doctor of law degree, in what some scholars believe to be the most cynical form of “tactless academic marketing”.

Slap on MM cheek in Cambridge

1977 Atal Bihari Vajpayee, External Affairs Minister of India, addressed the UNO General Assembly in Hindi language. Dr. Singh proudly spoke in English at the time of getting Doctorate Degree at Cambridge. If he has shame for National language Hindi, than he should use Punjabi in her speech. He and Sonia Gandhi knowingly to dishonor the Vandemataram remained absent on September 7, 2006when whole nation was singing Vandemataram as decided and instructed by the HRD Minister Arjun Singh on behalf of his Govt..

If we ourselves dishonor our language, our Sanskrit, our culture, our national song to honor others’ then how can we expect from others.

Smith, who has taught Sanskrit to Cambridge undergraduates for 22 years said the decision was “tactless” in its timing and skewed in its objectives. “They are doing this at a point of time when they are honoring Manmohan Singh, soliciting benefactions from wealthy Indian businessmen and seeking students from South Asia,” he said. He said he had no new undergraduate students seeking to learn Sanskrit in this academic year, which began a week ago.

Smith added with unconcealed anger at Cambridge and other Western universities’ increasing propensity to run themselves as businesses that employ MBA-speak: “There are some subjects simply worth doing. This is a language that has been going 3,000 years and hasn’t stopped yet. You cannot understand the culture of the Indian sub-continent and the world outside it without learning Sanskrit”. Full report on this can be read at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2161235.cms

Worshipper of Golden Temple dared to speak in Oxford golden words “India’s experience with Britain had benefited too” to forget Jaliawala Bagh. Now he is joyous to remind his slavery days in Cambridge

Congress led Govt tributes martyrs and honor Supreme Court to stay hanging of Afzal.

Are alumni of Cambridge Manmohan Singh follower of his predecessors other alumis Lord Macaulay and Mohammed Iqbal who were greatest enemies of India?
Thomas Babington, Lord Macaulay (1800-1859) Historian’s followers are now writing history of India to enter in HRD Ministry’s NCERT and IGNOU.

Mohammed Iqbal: Right hand of Jinnah to divide India on the basis of two nation theory through the Muslim League which is still taking breadth in India and sharing power in the Central Govt with the Congress.

As a chief guest of the Jamia Millia Islamia’s convocation the President A.P.J. Kalam quoted Macaulay’s 1835 speech in British Parliament, ‘I do not think we would ever conquer this country (India), unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation.'”

Macaulayites Congress leaders
Macaulay’s biographer G.D. Trevelyan wrote: “A new India was born in 1835. The very foundations of her ancient civilization began to rock and sway. Pillar after pillar in the edifice came crashing down.”

Now remaining Macaulayites Congress leaders want to born a new India to ruin our glorious ancient civilization as described by the Supreme court in its various judgements and Foremer President Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan.

Manmohan should follow Bugti a Oxford Alumi
Oxford-educated tribal chieftain Baloch freedom fighter Bugti became vociferously critical of the military dictatorship after General Musharraf assumed power in a bloodless coup on 12 October 1999. Bugti’s key legacy lies in his patriotic death, and in Musharraf’s apparent miscalculation of the tribal elder’s popularity.

Wilful betrayal implies some sort of hatred
At the time of praising Oxford and Cambridge he feels shame to mention our historical Institutions which are now being made ‘camp of gundaism’ by the congress and comrades. There are three notable Oxford alumni of India: Indira Gandhi, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan president 1962-67 and Manmohan Singh. Manmohan Sinh should read Radha Krishnan what he said about Hindutva and Hinduism. Is India made by Oxbridge returns? I never say patriots to those who are unable to see their inner side.

I recall an incident. Before 40 years in my young age I was puzzled to run press and to publish my Hindi weekly. Every time I needed money from my father to run these. The principal of the school in which I was the student was helping nature to me. He guided me and said that I saw always outside towards your father instead of your inner side. He asked me to make a list of such persons to whom I had to recover bills against ad or stationery. I made a list and I went to collect money. I wondered that I had collected much recovery. Our govt looks always abroad instead of to develop our recourses.

If PM is still slaves of British Rule then he should resign at-once.

Christian Missionaries are giving good education to call spirit of Christ in the schools so they can be converted in Christ in due course. Dacoit kidnapped in revenge a son of another, gives him food and education and makes him dacoit to take the revenge.

A thief snatches money purse of the pocket of a co-passenger. On demand the co-passenger is unable to give money for the ticket to the conductor. Then thief in curtsey gives Rupee five note to the conductor for the co-passenger.

Are these praiseable services with good intention? If not then why highly qualified dignitary says “Cambridge made me”

Salute those who invented Manmohan, Sonia and like other clones!

PM Manmohan Singh’s remarks praising British Raj in Oxford University was a wake up call for nationalists and patriotic. Repetition of it is today to say “Cambridge made me”. Really he is a mixture of loyalty to 10 Janpath and slavery for British rule. He is a great freedom fighter along with Sonia Gandhi to blame Hindu organizations.
“When I became the Finance Minister of India in 1991, our Government launched the Indo-British Partnership Initiative.” PM said in the Cambridge. And when he became PM in 2004, his government launched the Indo-Pak partnership to counter terrorism by joint mechanism and wants to sale nuke security and secrecy of India in the hands of America.

“Ghar Phoonk tamasha dekh”
I recall an incident. My friend told me a real story of his uncle. His uncle was too much loyal towards his friends. He took costly things including cash from his home to give his friends. He caught and beaten by elders. Then he called his friends in a certain time in the night out of his home. He threw the cash and other materials from the upper story roof to outside. His friends collected them. Our govt is like that.

Farmers’ suicide
UK is a Christian country but a Catholic queen can’t be heir of the British throne according to the prevailing lawa there but we Indians are the great in the world. Families of the farmers who are doing suicide have loaded Cathoic Christian Italian directed government on their heads. There should be a white paper of Govt how many suicides of farmers were in NDA rule and how many are being now. Sonia say his son says to rule the country is the birth right of Gandhi dynasty. Photo of Rahul Gandhi has been fixed now in the Congress Office along with others who ruins the country. Secular part of fouth pillar media is overlapped by the photos of such leaders. Still they say themselves ‘Buhijivi (intelligencia)’.

Jaggery attracting ants-terrorists
Sonia Gandhi is busy in grooming her son. Manmohan is jumping everywhere. Monkey cuts a little corner of fruit and throw it. Repetition of this is the habit of a monkey. Our PM never fulfill any promise or any policy. Luckily he got a sword of PM post. Bad luckily he is wounding the security of our country and safety of our people. His sound and walk is sweet jaggery attracting ants-terrorists.

Change for PM chair
Dr. Singh already said that intead of a politician he is an academic. Then why he should not resign from PM post. Pt Nehru said that he is accidentally Hindu but his name begins with Pt. He never decalred publicly that he was not a Hindu. Even his daughter married Muslim or Parsi but Nehru made her Indira Gandhi to declare her as a Hindu. Nehru was a Kashmiri Pandit but now Kashmiri pandits are in the streets of Delhi as a refugee. How can be possible for me to write here sins and mischiefs of Nehru Gandhi dynasty in this article?

Bureau-tic PM
“There is External Affairs Minister’s vacancy. There is Labour Minister’s vacancy. I have to (fill them) and I will do so shortly.” – – – Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told journalists on board his special flight while returning from Johannesburg to New Delhi.

Now I come to Vivekanand of 1893

Swami Vivekananda in Chicago, September, 1893

Addresses at the Parliament of Religions – 1

Response to Welcome

Sisters and Brothers of America,

It fills my heart with joy unspeakable to rise in response to the warm and cordial welcome which you have given us. I thank you in the name of the most ancient order of monks in the world. I thank you in the name of the mother of religions, and I thank you in the name of millions and millions of Hindu people of all classes and sects.

Aishwarya’s ‘Om Shanti’ at UN reminds Vivekananda’s Chikago Speech


Tweets on Vandematram

Vande Mātaram “I bow to thee, Mother”) is a poem from Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay’s 1882 novel Anandamath. It was written in Bengali andSanskrit. It is a hymn to the Mother Land . It played a vital role in the Indian independence movement, first sung in a political context by Rabindranath Tagore at the 1896 session of the Indian National Congress.

“Vande Mataram”, the National Song of India, eulogizes India as a Goddess and glorifies Indian patriotism in a beautiful manner. Originally designated as the Indian National Anthem, the song, rather its first paragraph, was later given the status of the Indian National Song. Penned originally in Sanskrit by Shri Bankimchandra Chattyopaddhay, the song was written in 1876 and quickly became an inspiration for the Indian freedom fighters following its appearance in the ace novelist’s Bengali novel ‘Anand Math’ (published in 1882). With 15th August nearing once more, it’s time again to go through the timeless verses of Vande Mataram and celebrate the occassion. Scroll down and read the lyrics of Vande Mataram in Sanskrit as well as its English rendering by Shri Aurobindo Ghosh, whose English translation of the song is generally considered to be the best.

In 1950 (after India’s independence), the song’s first two verses were given the official status of the “national song” of the Republic of India, distinct from the national anthem of India, Jana Gana Mana.

Uploaded on Aug 5, 2007: Youtube

A.R.Rahman’s version of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay’s original Vande Mataram composition – the track ‘Revival’ from his 1997 album Vande Mataram. Produced by Bharatbala Productions

Why not ‘Vandematram’ in Lok Sabha on Sept 07?

Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee has denied permission to the request of BJP minority members to sing the national song in the precincts of Parliament on September 7, 2006. This Article has full discussion on this.

Patriotic National anthem ‘Vandematram’ inspires Unity and invokes duty towards Nation.

Lord Shiva’s Palace became Tajmahal:as Ram Janm Bhumi Temple became Babri structure:



Lord Shiva’s Palace became Tajmahal:as Ram Janm Bhumi Temple became Babri structure: www.newsanalysisindia.com/
Lord Shiva’s Palace (Tejomahalya Temple) became Tajmahal:as Ram Janm Bhumi Temple became Babri structure
Tags: Tajmahal, Lord Shiva Palace, Tejomahalay temple, P N Oak, BJP, Hashim Ansari, Mugle Azam Khan, Waqf Board, Laxmikant Bajpai, Sanskrit Inscription, European visitors
Janm Bhumi Temple became Babri structure. Now even Hashim Ansari is panic to see Ram Lala in tent but Jihadi seculars in the leadership of Italian born Gandhis filed Ramdrohi affidavit in the Supreme Court to ruin Ram Sethu.
Hashim Ansari has dared Mugle Azam Khan to take up the Babri Masjid case in the Supreme Court, a day after the UP minority affairs minister claimed that there would be many volunteers to pursue the litigation if the oldest surviving plaintiff decides to withdraw. Ansari also warned Khan and Babri Mosque Action Committee convener Zafaryab Jilani from making any adverse remark against him.
On November 13, Mugle – Azam Khan had said that the Taj Mahal, one of the wonders of the world, should be declared a property of the state’s waqf board. Mugle- Azam Khan Khan, during a convention of ‘mutawallis’ (caretakers) asked chairman of State Sunni Central Waqf Board to make Taj Mahal a property of the board and appoint him as ‘mutwalli’.
BJP chief Laxmikant Bajpai on Dec 7 replied to Mugle- Azam Khan, “Azam’s dream to offer namaz five times at Taj will never be fulfilled,”
To follow the line of Shree P N Oak Bajpai said that it was a part of an ancient temple. Bajpai told reporters that Mughal emperor Shah Jahan “purchased a part of Tejo Mahalaya temple’s land from Raja Jai Singh” and claimed that documents to prove it still exist.
Related article:
Taj Mahal evoked Putin for divorce and Aurangjeb kept his father in the prison there!!

We are reproducing here the article published at hindunet.org: :Probably there is no one who has been duped at least once in a life time. But can the whole world can be duped? This may seem impossible. But in the matter of indian and world history the world can be duped in many respects for hundreds of years and still continues to be duped. The world famous Tajmahal is a glaring instance. For all the time, money and energy that people over the world spend in visiting the Tajmahal, they are dished out of concoction. Contrary to what visitors are made to believe the Tajmahal is not a Islamic mausoleum but an ancient Shiva Temple known as Tejo Mahalaya which the 5th generation moghul emperor ShahjahanShahjahan commandeered from the then Maharaja of Jaipur. The Tajmahal, should therefore, be viewed as a temple palace and not as a tomb. That makes a vast difference. You miss the details of its size, grandeur, majesty and beauty when you take it to be a mere tomb. When told that you are visiting a temple palace you wont fail to notice its annexes, ruined defensive walls, hillocks, moats, cascades, fountains, majestic garden, hundreds of rooms archaded verendahs, terraces, multi stored towers, secret sealed chambers, guest rooms, stables, the trident (Trishul) pinnacle on the dome and the sacred, esoteric Hindu letter “OM” carved on the exterior of the wall of the sanctum sanctorum now occupied by the centotaphs. For detailed proof of this breath taking discovery,you may read the well known historian Shri. P. N. Oak’s celebrated book titled ” Tajmahal : The True Story”. But let us place before you, for the time being an exhaustive summary of the massive evidence ranging over hundred points:
1.The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb’s time. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
2.The ending “Mahal”is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as “Mahal”.
3.The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters “Mum” from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
4.Since the lady’s name was Mumtaz (ending with ‘Z’) the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a ‘J’).
5.Several European visitors of Shahjahan’s time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
6.The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
7.Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal, i.e., mansion apply to it?
8.Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Both its components namely, ‘Taj’ and’ Mahal’ are of Sanskrit origin.
9.The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it.
10.The tradition of removing the shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have to be removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.
11.Visitors may notice that the base slab of the centotaph is the marble basement in plain white while its superstructure and the other three centotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs. This indicates that the marble pedestal of the Shiva idol is still in place and Mumtaz’s centotaphs are fake.
12.The pitchers carved inside the upper border of the marble lattice plus those mounted on it number 108-a number sacred in Hindu Temple tradition.
13.There are persons who are connected with the repair and the maintainance of the Taj who have seen the ancient sacred Shiva Linga and other idols sealed in the thick walls and in chambers in the secret, sealed red stone stories below the marble basement. The Archaeological Survey of India is keeping discretely, politely and diplomatically silent about it to the point of dereliction of its own duty to probe into hidden historical evidence.
14.In India there are 12 Jyotirlingas i.e., the outstanding Shiva Temples. The Tejomahalaya alias The Tajmahal appears to be one of them known as Nagnatheshwar since its parapet is girdled with Naga, i.e., Cobra figures. Ever since Shahjahan’s capture of it the sacred temple has lost its Hindudom.
15.The famous Hindu treatise on architecture titled Vishwakarma Vastushastra mentions the ‘Tej-Linga’ amongst the Shivalingas i.e., the stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu deity. Such a Tej Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.
16.Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an ancient centre of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents have through ages continued the tradition of worshipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal every night especially during the month of Shravan. During the last few centuries the residents of Agra had to be content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva temples viz., Balkeshwar, Prithvinath, Manakameshwar and Rajarajeshwar. They had lost track of the fifth Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Apparently the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev Nagnatheshwar i.e., The Lord Great God of Agra, The Deity of the King of Cobras, consecrated in the Tejomahalay alias Tajmahal.
17.The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats. Their name of Shiva is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of The Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28,1971) mentions that the Jats have the Teja Mandirs i.e., Teja Temples. This is because Teja-Linga is among the several names of the Shiva Lingas. From this it is apparent that the Taj-Mahal is Tejo-Mahalaya, The Great Abode of Tej.
18. Shahjahan’s own court chronicle, the Badshahnama, admits (page 403, vol 1) that a grand mansion of unique splendor, capped with a dome (Imaarat-a-Alishan wa Gumbaze) was taken from the Jaipur Maharaja Jaisigh for Mumtaz’s burial, and the building was known as Raja Mansingh’s palace.
19. The plaque put the archealogy department outside the Tajmahal describes the edifice as a mausoleum built by Shahjahan for his wife Mumtaz Mahal , over 22 years from 1631 to 1653. That plaque is a specimen of historical bungling. Firstly, the plaque sites no authority for its claim. Secondly the lady’s name was Mumtaz-ulZamani and not Mumtazmahal. Thirdly, the period of 22 years is taken from some mumbo jumbo noting by an unreliable French visitor Tavernier, to the exclusion of all muslim versions, which is an absurdity.
20. Prince Aurangzeb’s letter to his father,emperor Shahjahan,is recorded in atleast three chronicles titled `Aadaab-e-Alamgiri’, `Yadgarnama’, and the `Muruqqa-i-Akbarabadi’ (edited by Said Ahmed, Agra, 1931, page 43, footnote 2). In that letter Aurangzeb records in 1652 A.D itself that the several buildings in the fancied burial place of Mumtaz were seven storeyed and were so old that they were all leaking, while the dome had developed a crack on the northern side.Aurangzeb, therefore, ordered immediate repairs to the buildings at his own expense while recommending to the emperor that more elaborate repairs be carried out later. This is the proof that during Shahjahan’s reign itself that the Taj complex was so old as to need immediate repairs.
21. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his secret personal `KapadDwara’ collection two orders from Shahjahan dated Dec 18, 1633 (bearing modern nos. R.176 and 177) requestioning the Taj building complex. That was so blatant a usurpation that the then ruler of Jaipur was ashamed to make the document public.
22. The Rajasthan State archives at Bikaner preserve three other firmans addressed by Shahjahan to the Jaipur’s ruler Jaising ordering the latter to supply marble (for Mumtaz’s grave and koranic grafts) from his Makranna quarris, and stone cutters. Jaisingh was apparently so enraged at the blatant seizure of the Tajmahal that he refused to oblige Shahjahan by providing marble for grafting koranic engravings and fake centotaphs for further desecration of the Tajmahal. Jaising looked at Shahjahan’s demand for marble and stone cutters, as an insult added to injury. Therefore, he refused to send any marble and instead detained the stone cutters in his protective custody.

23. The three firmans demanding marble were sent to Jaisingh within about two years of Mumtaz’s death. Had Shahjahan really built the Tajmahal over a period of 22 years, the marble would have needed only after 15 or 20 years not immediately after Mumtaz’s death.

24. Moreover, the three mention neither the Tajmahal, nor Mumtaz, nor the burial. The cost and the quantity of the stone also are not mentioned. This proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was needed just for some supercial tinkering and tampering with the Tajmahal. Even otherwise Shahjahan could never hope to build a fabulous Tajmahal by abject dependence for marble on a non cooperative Jaisingh.
25. Tavernier, a French jeweller has recorded in his travel memoirs that Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near the Taz-i-Makan (i.e.,`The Taj building’) where foriegners used to come as they do even today so that the world may admire. He also adds that the cost of the scaffolding was more than that of the entire work. The work that Shahjahan commissioned in the Tejomahalaya Shiva temple was plundering at the costly fixtures inside it, uprooting the Shiva idols, planting the centotaphs in their place on two stories, inscribing the koran along the arches and walling up six of the seven stories of the Taj. It was this plunder, desecrating and plunderring of the rooms which took 22 years.
26. Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra recorded in 1632 (within only a year of Mumtaz’s death) that `the places of note in and around Agra, included Taj-e-Mahal’s tomb, gardens and bazaars’.He, therefore, confirms that that the Tajmahal had been a noteworthy building even before Shahjahan.
27. De Laet, a Dutch official has listed Mansingh’s palace about a mile from Agra fort, as an outstanding building of pre shahjahan’s time. Shahjahan’s court chronicle, the Badshahnama records, Mumtaz’s burial in the same Mansingh’s palace.
28. Bernier, a contemporary French visitor has noted that non muslim’s were barred entry into the basement (at the time when Shahjahan requisitioned Mansingh’s palace) which contained a dazzling light. Obviously, he reffered to the silver doors, gold railing, the gem studded lattice and strings of pearl hanging over Shiva’s idol. Shahjahan comandeered the building to grab all the wealth, making Mumtaz’s death a convineant pretext.
29. Johan Albert Mandelslo, who describes life in agra in 1638 (only 7 years after mumtaz’s death) in detail (in his `Voyages and Travels to West-Indies’, published by John Starkey and John Basset, London), makes no mention of the Tajmahal being under constuction though it is commonly erringly asserted or assumed that the Taj was being built from 1631 to 1653.
30. A Sanskrit inscription too supports the conclusion that the Taj originated as a Shiva temple. Wrongly termed as the Bateshwar inscription (currently preserved on the top floor of the Lucknow museum), it refers to the raising of a “crystal white Shiva temple so alluring that Lord Shiva once enshrined in it decided never to return to Mount Kailash his usual abode”. That inscription dated 1155 A.D. was removed from the Tajmahal garden at Shahjahan’s orders. Historicians and Archeaologists have blundered in terming the insription the `Bateshwar inscription’ when the record doesn’t say that it was found by Bateshwar. It ought, in fact, to be called `The Tejomahalaya inscription’ because it was originally installed in the Taj garden before it was uprooted and cast away at Shahjahan’s command.
A clue to the tampering by Shahjahan is found on pages 216-217, vol. 4, of Archealogiical Survey of India Reports (published 1874) stating that a “great square black balistic pillar which, with the base and capital of another pillar….now in the grounds of Agra,…it is well known, once stood in the garden of Tajmahal”.
31. Far from the building of the Taj, Shahjahan disfigured it with black koranic lettering and heavily robbed it of its Sanskrit inscription, several idols and two huge stone elephants extending their trunks in a welcome arch over the gateway where visitors these days buy entry tickets. An Englishman, Thomas Twinning, records (pg.191 of his book “Travels in India A Hundred Years ago”) that in November 1794 “I arrived at the high walls which enclose the Taj-e-Mahal and its circumjacent buildings. I here got out of the palanquine and…..mounted a short flight of steps leading to a beautiful portal which formed the centre of this side of the `COURT OF ELEPHANTS” as the great area was called.”
32. The Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters of the Koran but nowhere is there even the slightest or the remotest allusion in that Islamic overwriting to Shahjahan’s authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder he would have said so in so many words before beginning to quote Koran.
33. That Shahjahan, far from building the marble Taj, only disfigured it with black lettering is mentioned by the inscriber Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an inscription on the building. A close scrutiny of the Koranic lettering reveals that they are grafts patched up with bits of variegated stone on an ancient Shiva temple.
34. A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory, has revealed that the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan,since the doors of the Taj, broken open by Muslim invaders repeatedly from the 11th century onwards, had to b replaced from time to time. The Taj edifice is much more older. It belongs to 1155 A.D, i.e., almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan.
35. Well known Western authorities on architechture like E.B.Havell, Mrs.Kenoyer and Sir W.W.Hunterhave gone on record to say that the TajMahal is built in the Hindu temple style. Havell points out the ground plan of the ancient Hindu Chandi Seva Temple in Java is identical with that of the Taj.
36. A central dome with cupolas at its four corners is a universal feature of Hindu temples.
37. The four marble pillars at the plinth corners are of the Hindu style. They are used as lamp towers during night and watch towers during the day. Such towers serve to demarcate the holy precincts. Hindu wedding altars and the altar set up for God Satyanarayan worship have pillars raised at the four corners.
38. The octagonal shape of the Tajmahal has a special Hindu significance because Hindus alone have special names for the eight directions, and celestial guards assigned to them. The pinnacle points to the heaven while the foundation signifies to the nether world. Hindu forts, cities, palaces and temples genrally have an octagonal layout or some octagonal features so that together with the pinnacle and the foundation they cover all the ten directions in which the king or God holds sway, according to Hindu belief.
39. The Tajmahal has a trident pinncle over the dome. A full scale of the trident pinnacle is inlaid in the red stone courtyard to the east of the Taj. The central shaft of the trident depicts a “Kalash” (sacred pot) holding two bent mango leaves and a coconut. This is a sacred Hindu motif. Identical pinnacles have been seen over Hindu and Buddhist temples in the Himalayan region. Tridents are also depicted against a red lotus background at the apex of the stately marble arched entrances on all four sides of the Taj. People fondly but mistakenly believed all these centuries that the Taj pinnacle depicts a Islamic cresent and star was a lighting conductor installed by the British rulers in India. Contrarily, the pinnacle is a marvel of Hindu metallurgy since the pinnacle made of non rusting alloy, is also perhaps a lightning deflector. That the pinnacle of the replica is drawn in the eastern courtyard is significant because the east is of special importance to the Hindus, as the direction in which the sun rises. The pinnacle on the dome has the word `Allah’ on it after capture. The pinnacle figure on the ground does not have the word Allah.
40. The two buildings which face the marble Taj from the east and west are identical in design, size and shape and yet the eastern building is explained away by Islamic tradition, as a community hall while the western building is claimed to be a mosque. How could buildings meant for radically different purposes be identical? This proves that the western building was put to use as a mosque after seizure of the Taj property by Shahjahan. Curiously enough the building being explained away as a mosque has no minaret. They form a pair af reception pavilions of the Tejomahalaya temple palace.
41. A few yards away from the same flank is the Nakkar Khana alias DrumHouse which is a intolerable incongruity for Islam. The proximity of the Drum House indicates that the western annex was not originally a mosque. Contrarily a drum house is a neccesity in a Hindu temple or palace because Hindu chores,in the morning and evening, begin to the sweet strains of music.
42. The embossed patterns on the marble exterior of the centotaph chamber wall are foilage of the conch shell design and the Hindu letter “OM”. The octagonally laid marble lattices inside the centotaph chamber depict pink lotuses on their top railing. The Lotus, the conch and the OM are the sacred motifs associated with the Hindu deities and temples.
43. The spot occupied by Mumtaz’s centotaph was formerly occupied by the Hindu Teja Linga a lithic representation of Lord Shiva. Around it are five perambulatory passages. Perambulation could be done around the marble lattice or through the spacious marble chambers surrounding the centotaph chamber, and in the open over the marble platform. It is also customary for the Hindus to have apertures along the perambulatory passage, overlooking the deity. Such apertures exist in the perambulatories in the Tajmahal.
44. The sanctom sanctorum in the Taj has silver doors and gold railings as Hindu temples have. It also had nets of pearl and gems stuffed in the marble lattices. It was the lure of this wealth which made Shahjahan commandeer the Taj from a helpless vassal Jaisingh, the then ruler of Jaipur.
45. Peter Mundy, a Englishman records (in 1632, within a year of Mumtaz’s death) having seen a gem studded gold railing around her tomb. Had the Taj been under construction for 22 years, a costly gold railing would not have been noticed by Peter mundy within a year of Mumtaz’s death. Such costl fixtures are installed in a building only after it is ready for use. This indicates that Mumtaz’s centotaph was grafted in place of the Shivalinga in the centre of the gold railings. Subsequently the gold railings, silver doors, nets of pearls, gem fillings etc. were all carried away to Shahjahan’s treasury. The seizure of the Taj thus constituted an act of highhanded Moghul robery causing a big row between Shahjahan and Jaisingh.
46. In the marble flooring around Mumtaz’s centotaph may be seen tiny mosaic patches. Those patches indicate the spots where the support for the gold railings were embedded in the floor. They indicate a rectangular fencing.
47. Above Mumtaz’s centotaph hangs a chain by which now hangs a lamp. Before capture by Shahjahan the chain used to hold a water pitcher from which water used to drip on the Shivalinga.
48. It is this earlier Hindu tradition in the Tajmahal which gave the Islamic myth of Shahjahan’s love tear dropping on Mumtaz’s tomb on the full moon day of the winter eve.

49. Between the so-called mosque and the drum house is a multistoried octagonal well with a flight of stairs reaching down to the water level. This is a traditional treasury well in Hindu temple palaces. Treasure chests used to be kept in the lower apartments while treasury personnel had their offices in the upper chambers. The circular stairs made it difficult for intruders to reach down to the treasury or to escape with it undetected or unpursued. In case the premises had to be surrendered to a besieging enemy the treasure could be pushed into the well to remain hidden from the conquerer and remain safe for salvaging if the place was reconquered. Such an elaborate multistoried well is superflous for a mere mausoleum. Such a grand, gigantic well is unneccesary for a tomb.
50. Had Shahjahan really built the Taj Mahal as a wonder mausoleum, history would have recorded a specific date on which she was ceremoniously buried in the Taj Mahal. No such date is ever mentioned. This important missing detail decisively exposes the falsity of the Tajmahal legend.
51. Even the year of Mumtaz’s death is unknown. It is variously speculated to be 1629, 1630, 1631 or 1632. Had she deserved a fabulous burial, as is claimed, the date of her death had not been a matter of much speculation. In an harem teeming with 5000 women it was difficult to keep track of dates of death. Apparently the date of Mumtaz’s death was so insignificant an event, as not to merit any special notice. Who would then build a Taj for her burial?
52. Stories of Shahjahan’s exclusive infatuation for Mumtaz’s are concoctions. They have no basis in history nor has any book ever written on their fancied love affairs. Those stories have been invented as an afterthought to make Shahjahan’s authorship of the Taj look plausible.
53. The cost of the Taj is nowhere recorded in Shahjahan’s court papers because Shahjahan never built the Tajmahal. That is why wild estimates of the cost by gullible writers have ranged from 4 million to 91.7 million rupees.
54. Likewise the period of construction has been guessed to be anywhere between 10 years and 22 years. There would have not been any scope for guesswork had the building construction been on record in the court papers.
55. The designer of the Tajmahal is also variously mentioned as Essa Effendy, a Persian or Turk, or Ahmed Mehendis or a Frenchman, Austin deBordeaux, or Geronimo Veroneo, an Italian, or Shahjahan himself.
56. Twenty thousand labourers are supposed to have worked for 22 years during Shahjahan’s reign in building the Tajmahal. Had this been true, there should have been available in Shahjahan’s court papers design drawings, heaps of labour muster rolls, daily expenditure sheets, bills and receipts of material ordered, and commisioning orders. There is not even a scrap of paper of this kind.
57. It is, therefore, court flatterers,blundering historians, somnolent archeologists, fiction writers, senile poets, careless tourists officials and erring guides who are responsible for hustling the world into believing in Shahjahan’s mythical authorship of the Taj.
58. Description of the gardens around the Taj of Shahjahan’s time mention Ketaki, Jai, Jui, Champa, Maulashree, Harshringar and Bel. All these are plants whose flowers or leaves are used in the worship of Hindu deities. Bel leaves are exclusively used in Lord Shiva’s worship. A graveyard is planted only with shady trees because the idea of using fruit and flower from plants in a cemetary is abhorrent to human conscience. The presence of Bel and other flower plants in the Taj garden is proof of its having been a Shiva temple before seizure by Shahjahan.
59. Hindu temples are often built on river banks and sea beaches. The Taj is one such built on the bank of the Yamuna river an ideal location for a Shiva temple.
60. Prophet Mohammad has ordained that the burial spot of a muslim should be inconspicous and must not be marked by even a single tombstone. In flagrant violation of this, the Tajamhal has one grave in the basement and another in the first floor chamber both ascribed to Mumtaz. Those two centotaphs were infact erected by Shahjahan to bury the two tier Shivalingas that were consecrated in the Taj. It is customary for Hindus to install two Shivalingas one over the other in two stories as may be seen in the Mahankaleshwar temple in Ujjain and the Somnath temple raised by Ahilyabai in Somnath Pattan.
61. The Tajmahal has identical entrance arches on all four sides. This is a typical Hindu building style known as Chaturmukhi, i.e.,four faced.
62. The Tajmahal has a reverberating dome. Such a dome is an absurdity for a tomb which must ensure peace and silence. Contrarily reverberating domes are a neccesity in Hindu temples because they create an ecstatic dinmultiplying and magnifying the sound of bells, drums and pipes accompanying the worship of Hindu deities.
63. The Tajmahal dome bears a lotus cap. Original Islamic domes have a bald top as is exemplified by the Pakistan Embassy in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, and the domes in the Pakistan’s newly built capital Islamabad.
64. The Tajmahal entrance faces south. Had the Taj been an Islamic building it should have faced the west.
65. A widespread misunderstanding has resulted in mistaking the building for the grave.Invading Islam raised graves in captured buildings in every country it overran. Therefore, hereafter people must learn not to confound the building with the grave mounds which are grafts in conquered buildings. This is true of the Tajmahal too. One may therefore admit (for arguments sake) that Mumtaz lies buried inside the Taj. But that should not be construed to mean that the Taj was raised over Mumtaz’s grave.
66. The Taj is a seven storied building. Prince Aurangzeb also mentions this in his letter to Shahjahan. The marble edifice comprises four stories including the lone, tall circular hall inside the top, and the lone chamber in the basement. In between are two floors each containing 12 to 15 palatial rooms. Below the marble plinth reaching down to the river at the rear are two more stories in red stone. They may be seen from the river bank. The seventh storey must be below the ground (river) level since every ancient Hindu building had a subterranian storey.
67. Immediately bellow the marble plinth on the river flank are 22 rooms in red stone with their ventilators all walled up by Shahjahan. Those rooms, made uninhibitably by Shahjahan, are kept locked by Archealogy Department of India. The lay visitor is kept in the dark about them. Those 22 rooms still bear ancient Hindu paint on their walls and ceilings. On their side is a nearly 33 feet long corridor. There are two door frames one at either end ofthe corridor. But those doors are intriguingly sealed with brick and lime.

68. Apparently those doorways originally sealed by Shahjahan have been since unsealed and again walled up several times. In 1934 a resident of Delhi took a peep inside from an opening in the upper part of the doorway. To his dismay he saw huge hall inside. It contained many statues huddled around a central beheaded image of Lord Shiva. It could be that, in there, are Sanskrit inscriptions too. All the seven stories of the Tajmahal need to be unsealed and scoured to ascertain what evidence they may be hiding in the form of Hindu images, Sanskrit inscriptions, scriptures, coins and utensils.
69. Apart from Hindu images hidden in the sealed stories it is also learnt that Hindu images are also stored in the massive walls of the Taj. Between 1959 and 1962 when Mr. S.R. Rao was the Archealogical Superintendent in Agra, he happened to notice a deep and wide crack in the wall of the central octagonal chamber of the Taj. When a part of the wall was dismantled to study the crack out popped two or three marble images. The matter was hushed up and the images were reburied where they had been embedded at Shahjahan’s behest. Confirmation of this has been obtained from several sources. It was only when I began my investigation into the antecedents of the Taj I came across the above information which had remained a forgotten secret. What better proof is needed of the Temple origin of the Tajmahal? Its walls and sealed chambers still hide in Hindu idols that were consecrated in it before Shahjahan’s seizure of the Taj.
70. Apparently the Taj as a central palace seems to have an chequered history. The Taj was perhaps desecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from Mohammad Ghazni onwards but passing into Hindu hands off and on, the sanctity of the Taj as a Shiva temple continued to be revived after every muslim onslaught. Shahjahan was the last muslim to desecrate the Tajmahal alias Tejomahalay.
71. Vincent Smith records in his book titled `Akbar the Great Moghul’ that `Babur’s turbulent life came to an end in his garden palace in Agra in 1630′. That palace was none other than the Tajmahal. 72. Babur’s daughter Gulbadan Begum in her chronicle titled `Humayun Nama’ refers to the Taj as the Mystic House.
73. Babur himself refers to the Taj in his memoirs as the palace captured by Ibrahim Lodi containing a central octagonal chamber and having pillars on the four sides. All these historical references allude to the Taj 100 years before Shahjahan.
74. The Tajmahal precincts extend to several hundred yards in all directions. Across the river are ruins of the annexes of the Taj, the bathing ghats and a jetty for the ferry boat. In the Victoria gardens outside covered with creepers is the long spur of the ancient outer wall ending in a octagonal red stone tower. Such extensive grounds all magnificently done up, are a superfluity for a grave.
75. Had the Taj been specially built to bury Mumtaz, it should not have been cluttered with other graves. But the Taj premises contain several graves atleast in its eastern and southern pavilions.
76. In the southern flank, on the other side of the Tajganj gate are buried in identical pavilions queens Sarhandi Begum, and Fatehpuri Begum and a maid Satunnisa Khanum. Such parity burial can be justified only if the queens had been demoted or the maid promoted. But since Shahjahan had commandeered (not built) the Taj, he reduced it general to a muslim cemetary as was the habit of all his Islamic predeccssors, and buried a queen in a vacant pavillion and a maid in another idenitcal pavilion.
77. Shahjahan was married to several other women before and after Mumtaz. She, therefore, deserved no special consideration in having a wonder mausoleum built for her.
78. Mumtaz was a commoner by birth and so she did not qualify for a fairyland burial.
79. Mumtaz died in Burhanpur which is about 600 miles from Agra. Her grave there is intact. Therefore ,the centotaphs raised in stories of the Taj in her name seem to be fakes hiding in Hindu Shiva emblems.
80. Shahjahan seems to have simulated Mumtaz’s burial in Agra to find a pretext to surround the temple palace with his fierce and fanatic troops and remove all the costly fixtures in his treasury. This finds confirmation in the vague noting in the Badshahnama which says that the Mumtaz’s (exhumed) body was brought to Agra from Burhanpur and buried `next year’. An official term would not use a nebulous term unless it is to hide some thing.
81. A pertinent consideration is that a Shahjahan who did not build any palaces for Mumtaz while she was alive, would not build a fabulous mausoleum for a corpse which was no longer kicking or clicking.
82. Another factor is that Mumtaz died within two or three years of Shahjahan becoming an emperor. Could he amass so much superflous wealth in that short span as to squander it on a wonder mausoleum?
83. While Shahjahan’s special attachment to Mumtaz is nowhere recorded in history his amorous affairs with many other ladies from maids to mannequins including his own daughter Jahanara, find special attention in accounts of Shahjahan’s reign. Would Shahjahan shower his hard earned wealth on Mumtaz’s corpse?
84. Shahjahan was a stingy, usurious monarch. He came to throne murdering all his rivals. He was not therefore, the doting spendthrift that he is made out to be.
85. A Shahjahan disconsolate on Mumtaz’s death is suddenly credited with a resolve to build the Taj. This is a psychological incongruity. Grief is a disabling, incapacitating emotion.
86. A infatuated Shahjahan is supposed to have raised the Taj over the dead Mumtaz, but carnal, physical sexual love is again a incapacitating emotion. A womaniser is ipso facto incapable of any constructive activity. When carnal love becomes uncontrollable the person either murders somebody or commits suicide. He cannot raise a Tajmahal. A building like the Taj invariably originates in an ennobling emotion like devotion to God, to one’s mother and mother country or power and glory.
87. Early in the year 1973, chance digging in the garden in front of the Taj revealed another set of fountains about six feet below the present fountains. This proved two things. Firstly, the subterranean fountains were there before Shahjahan laid the surface fountains. And secondly that those fountains are aligned to the Taj that edifice too is of pre Shahjahan origin. Apparently the garden and its fountains had sunk from annual monsoon flooding and lack of maintenance for centuries during the Islamic rule.
89. The stately rooms on the upper floor of the Tajmahal have been striped of their marble mosaic by Shahjahan to obtain matching marble for raising fake tomb stones inside the Taj premises at several places. Contrasting with the rich finished marble ground floor rooms the striping of the marble mosaic covering the lower half of the walls and flooring of the upper storey have given those rooms a naked, robbed look. Since no visitors are allowed entry to the upper storey this despoilation by Shahjahan has remained a well guarded secret. There is no reason why Shahjahan’s loot of the upper floor marble should continue to be hidden from the public even after 200 years of termination of Moghul rule.
90. Bernier, the French traveller has recorded that no non muslim was allowed entry into the secret nether chambers of the Taj because there are some dazzling fixtures there. Had those been installed by Shahjahan they should have been shown the public as a matter of pride. But since it was commandeered Hindu wealth which Shahjahan wanted to remove to his treasury, he didn’t want the public to know about it.
91. The approach to Taj is dotted with hillocks raised with earth dugout from foundation trenches. The hillocks served as outer defences of the Taj building complex. Raising such hillocks from foundation earth, is a common Hindu device of hoary origin. Nearby Bharatpur provides a graphic parallel.
Peter Mundy has recorded that Shahjahan employed thousands of labourers to level some of those hillocks. This is a graphic proof of the Tajmahal existing before Shahjahan.
93. At the backside of the river bank is a Hindu crematorium, several palaces, Shiva temples and bathings of ancient origin. Had Shahjahan built the Tajmahal, he would have destroyed the Hindu features.
94. The story that Shahjahan wanted to build a Black marble Taj across the river, is another motivated myth. The ruins dotting the other side of the river are those of Hindu structures demolished during muslim invasions and not the plinth of another Tajmahal. Shahjahan who did not even build the white Tajmahal would hardly ever think of building a black marble Taj. He was so miserly that he forced labourers to work gratis even in the superficial tampering neccesary to make a Hindu temple serve as a Muslim tomb.
95. The marble that Shahjahan used for grafting Koranic lettering in the Taj is of a pale white shade while the rest of the Taj is built of a marble with rich yellow tint. This disparity is proof of the Koranic extracts being a superimposition.
96. Though imaginative attempts have been made by some historians to foist some fictitious name on history as the designer of the Taj others more imaginative have credited Shajahan himself with superb architechtural proficiency and artistic talent which could easily concieve and plan the Taj even in acute bereavment. Such people betray gross ignorance of history in as much as Shajahan was a cruel tyrant ,a great womaniser and a drug and drink addict.
97. Fanciful accounts about Shahjahan commisioning the Taj are all confused. Some asserted that Shahjahan ordered building drawing from all over the world and chose one from among them. Others assert that a man at hand was ordered to design a mausoleum amd his design was approved. Had any of those versions been true Shahjahan’s court papers should have had thousands of drawings concerning the Taj. But there is not even a single drawing. This is yet another clinching proof that Shahjahan did not commision the Taj.
98. The Tajmahal is surrounded by huge mansions which indicate that several battles have been waged around the Taj several times.
99. At the south east corner of the Taj is an ancient royal cattle house. Cows attached to the Tejomahalay temple used to reared there. A cowshed is an incongruity in an Islamic tomb.
100. Over the western flank of the Taj are several stately red stone annexes. These are superflous for a mausoleum.
101. The entire Taj complex comprises of 400 to 500 rooms. Residential accomodation on such a stupendous scale is unthinkable in a mausoleum.
102. The neighbouring Tajganj township’s massive protective wall also encloses the Tajmahal temple palace complex. This is a clear indication that the Tejomahalay temple palace was part and parcel of the township. A street of that township leads straight into the Tajmahal. The Tajganj gate is aligned in a perfect straight line to the octagonal red stone garden gate and the stately entrance arch of the Tajmahal. The Tajganj gate besides being central to the Taj temple complex, is also put on a pedestal. The western gate by which the visitors enter the Taj complex is a camparatively minor gateway. It has become the entry gate for most visitors today because the railway station and the bus station are on that side.
103. The Tajmahal has pleasure pavillions which a tomb would never have.
104. A tiny mirror glass in a gallery of the Red Fort in Agra reflects the Taj mahal. Shahjahan is said to have spent his last eight years of life as a prisoner in that gallery peering at the reflected Tajmahal and sighing in the name of Mumtaz. This myth is a blend of many falsehoods. Firstly,old Shajahan was held prisoner by his son Aurangzeb in the basement storey in the Fort and not in an open,fashionable upper storey. Secondly, the glass piece was fixed in the 1930’s by Insha Allah Khan, a peon of the archaelogy dept.just to illustrate to the visitors how in ancient times the entire apartment used to scintillate with tiny mirror pieces reflecting the Tejomahalay temple a thousand fold. Thirdly, a old decrepit Shahjahan with pain in his joints and cataract in his eyes, would not spend his day craning his neck at an awkward angle to peer into a tiny glass piece with bedimmed eyesight when he could as well his face around and have full,direct view of the Tjamahal itself. But the general public is so gullible as to gulp all such prattle of wily, unscrupulous guides.
105. That the Tajmahal dome has hundreds of iron rings sticking out of its exterior is a feature rarely noticed. These are made to hold Hindu earthen oil lamps for temple illumination.
106. Those putting implicit faith in Shahjahan authorship of the Taj have been imagining Shahjahan-Mumtaz to be a soft hearted romantic pair like Romeo and Juliet. But contemporary accounts speak of Shahjahan as a hard hearted ruler who was constantly egged on to acts of tyranny and cruelty, by Mumtaz.
107. School and College history carry the myth that Shahjahan reign was a golden period in which there was peace and plenty and that Shahjahan commisioned many buildings and patronized literature. This is pure fabrication. Shahjahan did not commision even a single building as we have illustrated by a detailed analysis of the Tajmahal legend. Shahjahn had to enrage in 48 military campaigns during a reign of nearly 30 years which proves that his was not a era of peace and plenty.
108. The interior of the dome rising over Mumtaz’s centotaph has a representation of Sun and cobras drawn in gold. Hindu warriors trace their origin to the Sun. For an Islamic mausoleum the Sun is redundant. Cobras are always associated with Lord Shiva.
109. The muslim caretakers of the tomb in the Tajmahal used to possess a document which they styled as “Tarikh-i-Tajmahal”. Historian H.G. Keene has branded it as `a document of doubtful authenticity’. Keene was uncannily right since we have seen that Shahjahan not being the creator of the Tajmahal any document which credits Shahjahn with the Tajmahal, must be an outright forgery. Even that forged document is reported to have been smuggled out of Pakistan. Besides such forged documents there are whole chronicles on the Taj which are pure concoctions.
110. There is lot of sophistry and casuistry or atleast confused thinking associated with the Taj even in the minds of proffesional historians, archaelogists and architects. At the outset they assert that the Taj is entirely Muslim in design. But when it is pointed out that its lotus capped dome and the four corner pillars etc. are all entirely Hindu those worthies shift ground and argue that that was probably because the workmen were Hindu and were to introduce their own patterns. Both these arguments are wrong because Muslim accounts claim the designers to be Muslim,and the workers invariably carry out the employer’s dictates.
The Taj is only a typical illustration of how all historic buildings and townships from Kashmir to Cape Comorin though of Hindu origin have been ascribed to this or that Muslim ruler or courtier.
It is hoped that people the world over who study Indian history will awaken to this new finding and revise their erstwhile beliefs.
Those interested in an indepth study of the above and many other revolutionary rebuttals may read this author’s other research books.
Tajmahal The True Story authored by Shri P.N. Oak can be ordered from :
A. Ghosh Publisher
5720, W. Little York #216
Houston, Texas 77091
Latest articles related to my book: “Accursed (Sunanda) & Jihadi Neighbour”:
First Chapter of my forthcoming book titled “Accursed & Jihadi neighbour”
Chapter-2: Accursed Sunanda & Jihadi Neighbour: Death flames touche 5 Star Leela to Hotel Aman ..Accursed-Sunanda
Sunanda Case and Kashmir Issue Chapt-3
Iraq Afghan Terror Looms on Kashmir:Chapt-4: Accursed (Sunanda) & Jihadi..
Art 370 & PoK, result of Lord Mountbatten’s hided enmity with Nehru due to his romance with Edwina: Chapt-5: Accursed..
Why is still Ram Lala under tent in Ayodhya? Accursed…Chapt-6
Kashmiri Pundits remain refugees in their own nation: Chapt-7: Accursed (Sunanda)…PREFACE of the book titled “Accursed and Jihadi Neighbour”
Mysterious Death of Sunanda- Chapt-8- Accursed & Jihadi Neighbour
PREFACE of the book titled “Accursed and Jihadi Neighbour”
Synopsis of Book “Accursed (Sunanda) & Jihadi Neighbour
You may visit us at:
Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com
https://t witter.com/thechanshattisgarh

Read Book by clicking here: Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966
AAP’s Yogendra Yadav Political Guru of Rahul Gandhi: Maoists invade Congress
Ford Foundation of o a Italian village: Donation to Kejriwal who never utter against Sonia?
पढ़िएवाजपेयीजीकी२७कवितायेँ : Read 27 Poems of Atal Bihari Vajpayee:Ji


Kejriwal on Republic Day of 2014 and 2015: Nizam of HYD when revolted and when surrender

Tags: Kejriwal, Republic Day of 2014, Republic Day 2015, Anarchist, TOI, Nizam of Hyderabad, Revolt, Surrender

Kejriwal on Republic Day of 2014 and 2015: Nizam of HYD when revolted and when surrender

I want to attend the Republic Day celebrations, don’t know why I wasn’t invited: Arvind Kejriwal: TOI reported on Jan 26, 2015


This is ironic that the same Kejriwal as anarchist wanted to disturb Republic Day 2014

Tweets at Twitter

@ANI_news  I want to attend the Republic Day celebrations,don’t know why I wasn’t invited: Arvind Kejriwal  12:23 PM – 24 Jan 2015

@TimesNow  “No former CMs have been invited as per protocol,”says BJP defending its decision not to invite Arvind Kejriwal to Republic Day celebrations 1:33 PM – 24 Jan 2015



Kejriwal behaves as the Nizam of Hyderabad when revolted and when surrender on September 17, 1948




Book: Accursed & Jihadi Neighbour






Book: Accursed & Jihadi Neighbur

ISBN 978-81-930512-0-7

Language: Englishi,

Size: 9”x5.5”

Pages 202

Book in hard bound cover:  Price: Rs.150- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

Author: Premendra AgrawaL

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

Web: http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/


DLF-Vadra: Bhrasht Tantra: Book in Hindi

Language: Hindi,

Size: 9”x5.5”

Pages 100

Price: Rs 50 + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

Author: Premendra AgrawaL

Email: premendraagrawal@gmail.com

Web: http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/


Read Book by clicking here: Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966


Nizam’s Poem on 1st Republic Day 1950: Historical Pictures Nizam with Patel and Shastri


Tags: Nizam Mir Osman Ali Khan, Poem, Republic Day 1950, Nizam with Patel, Nizam with Shastri, Nizam of Hyderabad, TelanganaKarnataka, Maharashtra

Nizam’s Poem on 1st Republic Day 1950: Historical Pictures Nizam with Patel and Shastri


Written by the Deposed Nizam Mir Osman Ali Khan on the occasion of India’s becoming a Republic Day 1950


The Nizam-ul-Mulk of Hyderabad, popularly known as the Nizam of Hyderabad, was a monarch of the Hyderabad State, now divided into the states of TelanganaKarnataka and Maharashtra.


The festivities over, the Nizam drove to his palace in King Kothi and hurriedly put down his thoughts in the form of a poem. Guess what he could have penned? It was a Persian ‘nazm’ highlighting the significance of Republic Day. Not many know how the Nizam rejoiced at India becoming a Republic. An English translation by Sir Nizamat Jung, a former minister, brings out the beauty of the Persian verses.

The tidings that from Delhi’s walls rang wide

Brought solace to all hearts, and joy and pride

The 16-verse poem highlights the Nizam’s spirit of flexibility and ends on a joyous note:

The new Dawn’s greetings, “Osman”, rich and strange

And the four quarters hail the promised change

Though he lost his monarchy the Nizam lost no time in adapting to the new realities. “He did not allow any reservations to overcome him and whole-heartedly welcomed the change,” says Dawood Ashraf, a researcher who has collected the Persian poem and its English translation from a government file preserved in the A.P. State Achieves and Research Institution. The Nizam did not remain content composing the poem. He wanted it published in prominent English newspapers in the country. He immediately sent an English translation of his Persian poem to Mr. Vellodi’s residence in Bolarum with a request to forward it to ‘higher authorities’ in Delhi. “I would like this poem to be published in English papers in India in commemoration of that historic declaration as it was an unique event in the annals of India,” Osman Ali Khan wrote to Mr. Vellodi.

The latter then sent the poem with his remarks to V.P. Menon, Secretary, Ministry of States, Delhi, with a request to bring it to the notice of then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Home Minister.

Pandit Nehru is stated to have suggested the publication of the poem along with its English translation. “But it is not known when and in which newspapers the poem was published,” says Mr. Ashraf.

Translated by Sir Nizamat Jung.

What splendour for our eyes – suspicious, fair!
What fragrance wafted on the morning air!
The tidings that from Delhi’s wails rang wide
Brought solace to all hearts, and joy and pride
To hearts released from bonds of caste and race –
­Yea, hearts that only bend before God’s Grace.
­How wondrous is the bond of Love! No heart
Disowns the spell it works by mystic art.
“Karbalas’ martyrdom” – love’s glorious meed –
proclaims what blessings crown the pure heart’s creed
‘Tis not the throned seat, the waving plume;
The heart’s the throne that golden deeds illume.
The feast’s prepared, the sparkling bowl o’erflows!
What joyous strains towards thee the Zephyr blows!
The new Dawn’s greetings, “OSMAN”, rich and strange,
And the four quarters hail the promised change!


People woke up on the dawn of September 17, 1948, they heard the big news of the Nizam’s surrender, dubbed one of the meekest in history. It not only freed people from enslavement, but facilitated the integration of Hyderabad into the Indian Union, an event they had been long pining for.

The best picture of the times that captured one of the decisive moments in Hyderabad’s chequered history said it all. Here was “His Exalted Highness, Lt. Gen Muzaffar-ul Mulk Wal Mumalik Nizam- ul-Mulk, Nizam-ud-Dowla, Nawab Sir Mir Osman Ali Khan Bahadur, the Faithful Ally of the British, Nizam of Hyderabad,” arguably one of the richest men in the world, nearly bowing with a traditional “namaste” before the redoubtable first Indian Union Home Minister, Sardar Vallabhai Patel, at the Begumpet Airport.

01-Mir Osman Ali Khan receives Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri at Begumpet airport

Nizam receives Prime Minister Shastri  at Begumpet Airport

Netaji Mystery: Who Killed Netaji?



Netaji Mystery: Who Killed Netaji?

Congress killed Netaji files. Why Nehru betrayed Netaji. Gold-Diamond loaded Trunks took Air journey. Where was wealth of Azad Hind Bank? What said JanmBhoomi editor? What said Nehru to UK PM?

Who were involved in the conspiracy to murder Subhash Chandra Bose, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukerjee and Lal Bahadur Shstri? It is not possible to find out answers of all these in this limited worded article.

Researcher Professor Purabi Roy and her fellows, who have estimated the worth of INA funds and who are prominent deponent before the Mukherjee commission, have some light to throw on the issue. But Report of Mukherjee commission is totally rejected by Congress led Govt. without giving any reason. Congress ally CPM also suspects congress move and wants the discussion in the parliament on the Report.

Threatening to Researchers

Did Netaji really die in the 1945 plane crash? Incredibly hard facts have now emerged fromMoscow vaults. Netaji was in fact very much alive till at least 1946 one full year after his supposed “death”. Russian archives had yielded two precious documents. The first concerned a discussion that Joseph Stalin had with his defense minister Voroschilov and foreign affairs minister Molotov in 1946. The second was a report filed by a Soviet field agent stationed in India, also in 1946.

One more British archive document also states that the entire theory of the plane crash, in Taihuku (Japan), was pre-planned and contrived. In fact as late as December 20, 1945, a Japanese newspaper even reported that Bose was on his way to the Soviet Union and passed through Tokyo.

Find the killer of Netaji

British Prime Minister Clements Attlee decided ‘Let him remain where he (Subhash C. Bose) is now’. This decision was taken in October 1945. It clearly indicates that he was alive even in Oct 1945.

Netaji was reported to be alive even after 1945 by the British intelligence from Teheran andKabul quoting the Russian embassy officials. This was even stated in the Shah Nawaz commission report (File No. 10/ Mis/ INA-pp 38, 39).

In 1946, Gallacher, a British communist party worker publicly criticised the then Irish President D’ Valera for welcoming Netaji in Doublin! D’ Valera didn’t deny this. He visitedIndia after 1946 and even commented publicly ‘I expected to meet Bose here’!

The British intelligence has reported that Nehru knew where Netaji was. Nehru took the Foreign Affairs portfolio himself and appointed none other than Vijayalekshmi Pandit as the ambassador to Russia!

After her term was over, Dr S.Radhakrishnan became the representative to Russia. Dr Saroj Das of Calcutta University told his friend Dr R.C.Muzumdar that Radhakrishnan had told him that Netaji was in Russia.

Former Indian ambassador Dr Satyanarayana Sinha once met Goga, the son of Abani Mukherjee, a revolutionist in the Russian communist party; who told him that his father and Netaji were prisoners in adjacent cells in Siberia. He also told Sinha that Netaji had assumed the name ‘Khilsai Malang’ there.


The most shocking of all information it contained was that Netaji had posted a letter from Russia to Nehru, telling that he wished to come back and he also asked Nehru to make amendments for his come back!

You may confirm this from the parliamentary records from 3rd August 1977; and the files published by the British government.

As reported in every newspaper at that time, daughter of Stalin Swetlana said inDelhi that Netaji was in Siberia’s yarkutaskjail. She also gave barrack No. also.

Speaking to the Hindu, Prof. Guha lent evidence to the view that Subhash Chandra Bose died in a Soviet Prison. He noted that Joseph Stalin was crueler than Adolf Hitler’.

A Soviet agent named V G Sayadyants who was based in Mumbai reported home that “Bose is the only hope for Soviet Russia,”

The new findings are based on declassified documents in the Russian military archives in Paddolsk, and from the British archives. They were discovered by three researchers-Purabi Ray, Hari Vasudevan and Shobanlal Dutta Gupta-working on the history of communist movement in India. The plot has thickened even deeper with the admission by these researchers that they have been receiving threatening calls from unidentified persons asking them to suspend all further inquiries and end the government-funded research. Fear for security led the work on the project to be stopped shortly, around the middle of 2000. For Details: www.swordoftruth.com/swordoftruth/archives/byauthor/shamolimitra/tmbnd.html


Why Mukherjee Commission Report rejected?

Congress does not want the nation to know Jawaharlal Nehru’s actions and role in betraying Netaji. The previous two Commissions: Shah Nawaz Committee and the Khosla Commission were appointed by the Congress government. For bringing truth BJP let NDA Govt. appointed Mukherjee Commission.

“I saw Netaji alive after his alleged plane crash” is disclosed by Capt Abbas Ali, an old INA freedom fighter.

“It was ‘unbelievable’ that Netaji died in an air crash” said by Suresh Chandra Bose elder brother of Subhash C.Bose. He deposing before the Khosla Commission charged Mr Shah Nawaz Khan with “playing Netaji false”

Deposing before the Khosla Commission, Dr Satyanarayan Sinha said Colonel Habibur Rehman had confessed to him at Patna in 1946 that he had had told a lie when he said that Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose died in a plane crash in Taipeh on August 18, 1945


Killing of Netaji files by Congress Governments

Most of the secret files about Netaji, that were maintained by Pandit Nehru himself as “P.M.’s special” files, one of which included all communications connected with INA Defense Committee, were reported by the Indira Gandhi Government as “either missing or destroyed”. It will not be easy to presume that Netaji’s communication to Nehru and a copy of Nehru’s letter to Attlee have also been destroyed. These files were dealt with by the personal secretary of Pt Nehru – Mohmd Yunus.


Nehru’s shocking role in betraying Netaji

Shyamlal jain, the confidential steno of the INA Defense Committee, in the course of his deposition, made a shocking revelation about Nehru’s attitude toward Netaji,”Later Nehru asked me to type a letter on his letterhead. Mr.Nehru addressed that letter to Mr.Clamment Attlee the then PM of Britain, in which Mr.Attlee was informed about the contents of that hand written note regarding Mr.Subhash entry into Russian territory.

“I solemnly affirm and state on oath that thereafter Shri Jawaharlal Nehru gave me four papers from his writing pad to make four copies of a letter, which he would dictate to me on typewriter, which I also complied. The contents of the letter, as far as I could remember, were as follows


Dear Mr. Attlee:

I understand from a reliable source that Subhas Chandra Bose, your war criminal, has been allowed to enter Russian territory by Stalin. This is a clear treachery and betrayal of faith by the Russians. As Russia has been an ally of the British-Americans, it should not have been done. Please take note of it and do what you consider proper and fit.

Yours sincerely,
Jawaharlal Nehru


Col. Tada

Col. Tada, one of the principal architects of Netaji’s escape plan confided to S.A. Iyer in 1951 that the Japanese agreed to make necessary arrangements to convey Netaji to Russian territory across the border of Manchuria.

Late Amritlal Seth, editor ‘Janmabhumi’

Late Amritlal Seth, former editor of the Gujarati Daily Janmabhumi, who accompanied Nehru during his visit to Singapore told late Sarat Chandra Bose immediately after his return from Singapore that Panditji was warned by the British Admiral that, according to his report, ‘Bose’ did not die in the alleged air crash and if Nehru played up too high with the legends of Bose and demands for re-absorption of the INA (Azad Hind Fauz) in the Indian Army, he would be taking the risk of presenting India on a platter to Bose when he reappeared.

Journey of Gold-Diamond loaded Trunks:

What happened after August 18 remains shrouded in mystery. While conducting her research in Moscow and England Professor Purabi Roy pursued a war time major of MI5 who had snooped around Bose. Roy met the agent in Oxford and he told her that a huge amount of ‘INA money’ was handed over to Lord Mountbatten and a senior Congress leader in Singapore, and that is the key to Bose’s disappearance (and the subsequent reluctance to unravel the mystery) could be solved to a great extent by ascertaining the route that the funds travelled.” Read full story at: http://www.missionnetaji.org/newsite/page/treasure_treachery.html

Azad Hind Bank

Captain Wadhera sought to know the whereabouts of the huge wealth that was collected by Netaji for the freedom struggle and deposited in the Azad Hind Bank, which was specially opened to prevent misuse of cash and ornaments donated by Indians to strengthen the hands of the INA in its freedom struggle.

Recalling the events from his INA days, Captain Wadhera disclosed that a big rally was organized by the Indian Independence League at Singapore to welcome Netaji. “As the huge gathering of Indians in Singapore garlanded Netaji, nearly a truckload of garlands accumulated there”, he said.

After thanking the gathering, Netaji announced that he would like to auction the garlands that had been put around his neck.

“The bid started with Rs 1 lakh (in 1943 it was more than rupees fifty lakh of today). The first garland was auctioned for Rs 1 crore and 3 lakh, which was purchased by a Muslim industrialist of Malaya, Habibur Rehman. Later he volunteered his services to join the movement. The women offered their valuables and gold ornaments. Total collections at this auction were about Rs 25 crore”, Captain Wadhera nostalgically recalls”.

Mukherjee Commission submitted its report on November 8, 2005. The government sat on it for six months, then tabled it in Parliament on May 17, 2006, when it also rejected the report. Why such late in tabling the report?

Basically, the commission’s findings are the following:

(1). Netaji did not die in the August 1945 Taipei plane crash as reported.

(2) The ashes at Tokyo’s Renkoji temple are not his.

(3) The story of the crash was a trick to help him escape, and the Japanese and Taiwanese governments knew about it.

(4) The Indian government suppressed a report by the Taiwanese government which stated this in 1956.

(5) Netaji is now dead.

By Premendra Agrawal

Netaji Mystery: Jinnah, Gandhi, Nehru, and Azad knew: Who killed Netaji?

Netaji Mystery, Jinnah, Gandhi, Nehru, Azad, Who killed Neaji, CIC, Netaji death secrets, Indian Govt, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, Netaji Inquiry Committee, RTI

Netaji Mystery: Jinnah, Gandhi, Nehru, and Azad knew: Who killed Netaji?

Should dark side of Jinnah, Gandhi Nehru and Azad not be come out in light?


Information Commission (CIC) asked government to reveal Netaji death secrets. Thus CIC has opened the Netaji Mystery again. Why Nehru blocked and why present Indian Govt wants to hide thetruth on Netaji?

Re-opening of Netaji’s death/ disappearance mystery

The mystery over the 1945 disappearance of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose mayfinally come clear with the Central Information Commission (CIC) directingthe federal government to furnish details about it. The full bench of the CIC,headed by the Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah directedthe federal home ministry to furnish the information relating to thedisappearance of Bose sought by an individual. “By doing so, the MHA (Ministry of Home Affairs) would not only be discharging its legal duties andrendering an essential service to a public cause, it may finally help resolve anunsolved mystery of independent India ,” the CIC observed in its order. Sayantan Dasgupta, a resident of New Delhi , had sought certifiedcopies of all documents exhibited before the Netaji Inquiry Committee of 1956 headed by Shah Nawaz Khan and the Justice B.D. Khosla Commissionunder the Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005.

Conflicting accounts

While both the Khan Committee and the Khosla Commission agreed with thegovernment’s claim that Netaji died in a plane crash in Taiwan before Japanfell to the Allies, the Justice Manoj Mukherjee Commission, appointed by theNational Democratic Alliance government in 1999 was categorical in its reportthat the Taiwanese authorities had said that no such air crash took place

Art on Netaji: Who killed Subhash, his files and Ashes?

Gandhi samadhi memorial of Mahatma Gandhi

Gandhi samadhi memorial of Mahatma Gandhi has the epitaph Hē Ram, the last words uttered by Gandhi when Nathuram Godse fired on him. Who wants to think about the invisible face and its conspiracy which took the life of Netaji Subhash Bose? Who should be called traitors and who should be called patriots? Answer is buried beneath the various samadhis of Gandhighat and the ashes of Subhash Bose. Jawaharlal Nehru’s samadhi is to the north of the Raj Ghat and is known as the Shantivan or Shanti Vana meaning the forest of peace.

Did previous UPA government want o give respect to the last word of Mahatma Gandhi Hē Ram to ruin Ram Sethu?

Gandhism has been reconstructed bankruptThis happened due to the duplicacy of Gandhis and fake followers of Gandhi. Song of Movie ‘Sachcha Jhootha’ is “dil ko dekho chehra na dekho chehre ne laakhon ko loota hai” This should be sing now as ” Chehara ko dekho dil na dekho dil ne laakhon ko loota hai” People may go through the movie of Anupam Kher “Maine Gandhi ko nahen maraa’. Godse killed Gandhi only one time but ‘”har roz har pal.baar baar apne haathon se gala ghot kar mara hai. par mujhe koi dukh nahi (everytime i killed gandhi).’

Buddha mar gaya (2007) Rahul Rawail is the director and producer of this movie. Besides other Anupam kher is also acting in this film.

Money corrupts and a humongous amount of money corrupts humongously… That’s the take off point for Buddha Mar Gaya – a black comedy about dead bodies, mucho moolah and funerals… “Buddha Mar Gaya” takes you on a rip-roaring ride into a world littered with dead bodies, mucho moolah funerals….. Complicating matters further are an inquisitive and greedy servant, the Prime Minister’s fixer, a procurer of dead bodies, the paparazzi and for good measure a couple of cops… And of course internal jealousies, greed, rivalries within the family only add spice to the goings on …Budha Mar Gaya takes you on a rip- roaring ride into a world littered with dead bodies, body parts, unending greed, corruption, funerals, ice cubes and a femme fatale….

Who dare to make the movie on the secrets of the death of Netaji Subhash Bose?

Congress killed Netaji files

Why is the government relentlessly stonewalling queries about Bose? There are several theories.

Congress killed Netaji files. Why Nehru betrayed Netaji. Gold-Diamond loaded Trunks took Air journey. Where was wealth of Azad Hind Bank? What said JanmBhoomi editor? What said Nehru to UK PM?

Who were involved in the conspiracy to murder Subhash Chandra Bose, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukerjee and Lal Bahadur Shstri? It is not possible to find out answers of all these in this limited worded article titled “Who killed Netaji?” of May 18, 2006 who is republished again at my website: newsanalysisindia.com/

Netaji’s Ashes received and disappeared?

PM Nehru office said Netaji’s ashes were received


Question arises if received then where is that. Why was information of the receiving not given to the nation? This is not the magic of renowned magician P C Sarkar of Kolkata. Any one may verifty it from him. I am giving here his contact details: 140, B.T. Road, Block – D, Flat – 4. Calcutta-700 035. Phone- 2577-5497. As reported by Hindutantimes, An RTI application seeking response to a letter from India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru stating that ashes of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose was received has put the Ministry of External Affairs in a quandary.

Economictimes has now published an article titled “Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar: Freedom, won by himsa or ahimsa?In 1857 the mutineers were limited in numbers and lacked effective leaders. But to fight World War II, the British created an army of 2.5 million Indian soldiers, including a capable officer cadre trained at Sandhurst. By 1946, patriotic expectations had risen to a high pitch in India. Even Congressmen like Nehru, who had condemned the INA in 1942, were now defending INA rebels in military trials.In this atmosphere, the British feared they could no longer rely on the loyalty of the 2.5 million soldiers of the British Indian Army. Unlike in 1857 or 1942, friendly Indian forces would not put down a mutiny. In which case the mutineers would win and British civilians would be slaughtered.That, according to Freeman, made Britain’s exit absolutely certain. The 1857 mutiny may not have been a war of independence. But the 1946 naval mutiny made a repetition of 1857 seem so likely, and with such fearful results, that Churchill and his imperialist crowd lost all credibility even in Britain.


Page 404 om my book: Silent Assassins: Jan 11, 1966

Art on Netaji : Obama to Rajghat: Abe straight reached Kolkata to meet Neaji’s family

President Barack Obama plants a Peepal sapling in Rajghat garden.

Barack Obama, who considers Gandhi as one of the biggest influences on his life, paid his respects to the Mahatma at New Delhi’s Raj Ghat shortly after he reached New Delhi on Sunday Jan 25, 2015 to be the Chief Guest at 66th Republic Day celebrations, the first US president to be accorded the honour. Obama placed a wreath and folded his hands before the memorial.

In the visitors’ book, Obama wrote, “What Dr Martin Luther King Jr said then remains true today. ‘The spirit of Gandhi is very much alive in India today. And it remains a great gift to the world. May we always live in the spirit of love and peace- among all people and nations.”



In 2010, this is what Obama wrote in the same visitor’s book at Raj Ghat: “It’s a great honour and privilege to visit Mahatma Gandhi memorial, who was a great person who inspired the whole mankind with peaceful means.”




During his stay in India, on 23 August 2007, Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe instead of going to Rajghat will head to the eastern city of Kolkata to meet relatives of Indian freedom fighter Subhash Chandra Bose. Abe visited the Subhas Chandra Bose memorial hall in Kolkata. Abe said to Bose’s family “The Japanese are deeply moved by Bose’s strong will to have led the Indian independence movement from British rule. Netaji is a much respected name in Japan. Infosys Technologies founder-chairman N. R. Narayana Murthy, delivering the annual Netaji oration, said, “We have not paid him due respect. It is time this is corrected.”








Where 65 MPs hided who send letter to Obama as Nehru’s shocking letter to British PM Attlee?



Tags: 65 MPs letter, Letter to Obama, Nehru’s letter to Attlee, British PM Attlee, US, Democracy, Mir and Mirza, Citizen, Cadre, Voter

Where 65 MPs hided who send letter to Obama as Nehru’s shocking letter to British PM Attlee?

65 MPs letter to Obama and Nehru’s shocking letter to British PM Attlee: 65 MPs might follow Nehu’s letter to British Prime Minister of that time Attlee. UPA Govt and those MPs accepted US their AAka by doing this. We hope htat present government would not follow this path..

Shyamlal Jain, the confidential steno of the INA Defence Committee, in the course of his deposition, made a shocking revelation about Nehru’s attitude toward Netaji, ”Later Nehru asked me to type a letter on his letterhead. Mr.Nehru addressed that letter to Mr.Clamment Attlee the then PM of Britain, in which Mr.Attlee was informed about the contents of that hand written note regarding Mr.Subhash entry into Russian territory.

“I solemnly affirm and state on oath that thereafter Shri Jawaharlal Nehru gave me four papers from his writing pad to make four copies of a letter, which he would dictate to me on typewriter, which I also complied. The contents of the letter, as far as I could remember, were as follows

Dear Mr. Attlee:

I understand from a reliable source that Subhas Chandra Bose, your war criminal, has been allowed to enter Russian territory by Stalin. This is a clear treachery and betrayal of faith by the Russians. As Russia has been an ally of the British-Americans, it should not have been done. Please take note of it and do what you consider proper and fit.

Yours sincerely,

Jawaharlal Nehru.

“We wish to respectfully urge you to maintain the current policy of denying Mr. Modi a visa to theUnited States,” the MPs belonging to 12 parties have said in identical letters to Obama. One letter was signed by 25 Rajya Sabha members and the other by 40 Lok Sabha members vwritten on November 26 and December 5, 2102 respectively and re-faxed to the White House on Sunday.

Leaders and voters change their sides of different angel but cadres generally never change this. Is this strength or weakness of democracy? There should be discussion on this also.

In the democracy every citizen is the king or badshah. But they should not be Mir and Mirza: ‘the chess continues even as the British troops march into the city until they have a fight over the game. Mir, who has nearly shot Mirza and is ashamed of his behavior, says, ‘We cannot even cope with our wives, so how can we cope with the company’s army?’ Is citizenship of cadres different to the citizenship of leaders and voters? Who have both type of citizenship?



Book: Accursed & Jihadi Neighbour




Read Book by clicking here: Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966