Welcome to newsanalysisindia.com newsanalysis views reviews on current affair Laine’s crime on Shivaji: Afzal Khan Vs Afzal

Sonia and Rahul teach Indian history and Indian Culture as Laine wrote the book on Shivaji. Sonia Gandhi and sports Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar has insulted Veer Savarkar in public. We have to fight enemies with in and out side India. NCERT and IGNOU books under the supervision of HRD Minister Arjun, says Lokmanya Tilak and Savrkar were terrorists.

There was Afzal Khan. There is Afzal Guru. Who were brothers and who are not, this is not question. Kaurv and Pandav were brothers. Question is who are in which side, ‘Dharm’ or ‘Adharm’. What did President kalam and others for Dhanjay and what they wants to do for Afzal Guru. Which is ‘Dharm’ and which is ‘Adharm’. Question here is not who is Muslim and who Hindu was.

Bhism back slept body was on the arrows of Arjun. After the victory in Dharm Yudha, Padavas with Krishna went to Bhism for getting blessings. Bhism said in ‘anusanha’ to them: that due to his oath he was loyal to Hastinapur Crown, instead of Hastinapur Rajya(People of the nation). For this he was in the side of Kaurav (Hastinapur Crown of that time). So never take such oath. Every one should be loyal to the state (nation) instead of the crown. Without state, there is no status of crown. In his second preaching Bhism said that no one dared to divide the country, as he accepted the division of Hastinapur.

Congress should learn a lesson from the above version. Who divided India? Who gifted PoK? The sense of Rahul’s statement of Deoband is for them Gandhi dynasty is greater than the Country.

Shivaji killed Afzal Khan the enemy of Hindu Rashtra. For this type of patriotism he is being called ‘Veer Shivaji’. What did President, Government, fake secular leaders and Human Activists for Afzal Guru? Who initiated ‘Save Afzal move’? Are these brave patriots of the following?

Who agreed with the villain of Kargil for joint Mechanism? Why a giant media brought f Musharraf’s four point knife formula from Pakistan? They will be accountable before the public for these types of democratic crimes.

Santosh Kanwar, widow of Martyr Mangej Singh swore ''I shall not hesitate to send all my three sons to the front and will be proud if they die defending the country like their father”

High than Mount Everest height emotional words of the martyr-memorial at Kohima:

The correspondent of the same NDTV took interview of President kalam in France. It wanted to make two issues: one related to the mercy plea for Afzal Guru, and second the willingness of Honorable Kalam’s acceptance for the second term as a President. Now CPM has rejected the move. So the said media is neutral now.

An appeal against this order by Dhananjoy was also rejected by a division bench of the High Court a month later.

How should people forget rejection of Dhnajay’s mercy petition and sending back the mercy petition of Afzal Guru to the Government. Is he impartial in the above two move? Bal Congress and its allies called BJP and Shivsena communal because their stand is for Hindu Rashtra. Due to these two communal parties especially kalam might be President. “yah public hai, sab jaanti hai”

President A P J Abdul Kalam on Wednesday Aug 4, 2004, rejected the mercy petition of Dhananjoy Chatterjee.The President decided to reject the petition after he had discussions with legal experts, including Attorney General Milon Banerji.

A West Bengal trial court had sentenced him to death, which was confirmed by the high court and the Supreme Court, for raping and murdering 14-year-old school girl Hetal Parekh in 1990.

Sources in Rashtrapati Bhawan told rediff.com that the President signed the rejection of the mercy petition late last night.

While the mercy petition was rejected by the President on June 23, 1994, the Left ruled W. B. Government did not take any step to vacate the stay by the high court, till it came to the notice of a Judicial Department officer in October 2003

Shivaji to follow ‘Tit for tat’ policy, pretended to be extremely afraid of Afzal Khan and his army, and offered to surrender personally to him provided his well-being was guaranteed. When the meeting took place, Afzal Khan (a big, stocky and giant of a figure, compared to short and agile figure of Shivaji) tried to kill Shivaji with a big embrace and stab at Shivaji in the back, but ‘Hindu Rashtra’ founder was quick and he passed his arm around the Khan’s waist and disemboweled the Khan with a small and sharp four curving hooks dagger called the 'bichwa' under his palm.

As published in Wikipedia: Afzal Khani was notoriously known for the cenotaph and the tomb that he had constructed for his wives. History records that before Afzal Khan was going to fight against Sivaji he had killed his 64 wives within one hour and had buried them. It is believed that some of his wives even tried to run away as they didnt want to be killed. He was apprehensive about their future if he didnt return from the battle. Ultimately his fears came true as he was beheaded by Sivaji. Though Sivaji did not honour Afzal's last wish of burying his body near Bijapur Sivaji had Afzal buried in Pratapgarh.(Information provided on the site by persons trained by the Archaeological Survey of India )

As reported by CNN-IBN: Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray ordered party workers to burn James Laine's biography of Shivaji, which allegedly has derogatory comments on the Maratha king.

Thackeray slammed the Maharashtra government for lifting the ban imposed on the book Shivaji - The Hindu King in Muslim India.

"If this book comes out in the market, burn it wherever you find it. This is my order," Thackeray was quoted as saying in the party mouthpiece Samna.

The high court decision lifting the ban on the book had "crushed Maharashtrian pride", he claimed when a full bench of Bombay High Court last week quashed a notification banning the book, reported PTI.

The book was banned in 2004 following violent protests and the ransacking of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute in Pune, where Laine had done some of his research.

In short Laine forgot that. America was created by the citizens of surrounding countries opposite to India. I found two decisive facts in an article of Sandhya Jain: The fact that it did not once mention in his book, Shivaji's famed ambition to establish a Hindu Pad Padshahi. This is a strange omission in a work claiming to study how contemporary authors viewed Shivaji's historic role, and the assessment of his legacy by subsequent native and colonial writers. The most notable omission is of the poet Bhushan, who wrote: "Kasihki Kala Gayee, Mathura Masid Bhaee; Gar Shivaji Na Hoto, To Sunati Hot Sabaki!" [Kashi has lost its splendour, Mathura has become a mosque; If Shivaji had not been, All would have been circumcised (converted)].

Bhushan's verse has immense historical value because the Kashi Vishwanath temple was razed in 1669 and thus lost its splendour, and the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple was destroyed and converted into a mosque in 1670. Bhushan came to Shivaji's kingdom from the Mughal capital in 1671, and within two years composed Shiv Bhooshan, a biography of Shivaji. It clearly states that Shivaji wanted to set up a Hindu Pad Padshahi.