What can you say about Manmohan’s walk with manmohini flute as Krishna? He wants to win present Mahabharat to make a role of Lord Krishna. It is rightly said by Defensle analyst Brahma Chellaney: “Is it inconceivable that a military regime waging a low-intensity conflict against India centred on the export of jihad to murder and maim the innocent would order, in pursuit of dubious political goals, a terrorist strike that kills a number of its own countrymen, mostly Mohajirs and Hindus? And with Pakistani missiles named after invaders like Ghauri, Ghaznavi, Babar and Abdali, was it a mere accident that the train attack occurred in Panipat, the scene of three ignominious defeats in Indian history, the last being at the hands of Abdali in 1761?”

Should security of India is safe in the hands of political filmi actors party of Bollywood of UPA? “Bombing on Samjauta Express” took military ruler Pervez Musharraf no time to portray Pakistan as a victim and to claim the attack would "strengthen the resolve" for "peace between the two countries." His regime was also quick to resurrect its demand from last year for joint anti-terror investigations, but India did well to shoot it down. But what can you say? What will MM Sonia do in future? This government with coward paralysis hands is not believable. Mumbakars can’t believe on Mumbais girls and the rain.

Samjhauta Express bombing: Indian police could not interrogate Pakistani passengers due to the objection of Pakistan and both have joint mechanism. Opposite to this Jamaica police frequently interviewed to Pakistani Cricketers and their Managers for Woolmer’s murder though Jamaica and Pak have no joint mechanism.

Why was the train attacked in India, not in Pakistan? Answer: If any motive can logically be deduced for the cowardly attack on the hapless Samjhauta Express passengers, it is a frightful one. It is as if some sinister force, playing with the blood of the innocent, was perhaps seeking to prove, under the nose of the Indian government, that Pakistan is indeed a terror victim. Such was Dr Singh's prescience in calling Pakistan a fellow victim of terror that just over five months later a number of Pakistanis fell victim to an act of terror on Indian soil.

I have no enemity with so called giants in media. I recall Big B’s quote “Kahan Raja aur kahan rank”. But I can not stop to write where I see the flowing blood of my nation. For example one channel praises Mush and  Pakistan mostly, it should be welcomed. But why a renowned journalist became the ambassador of Mush for giving his message of four pointed knife formula to Indian Government? And later Manmohan accepted to think over on that decesive formula. But Mush denied. He takes trial of confused UPA government.

On April 13 again that director of big giant electronic media showed his anger face to BJP’s spokeperson Ravishankar on the discussion of exit poll. He angily wanted assurance for stopping the so called as per his presumption the hate speech of junior leaders of BJP in UP Election. Ravishankar or others may be eager to get publicty in that channel. But I don’t want the publicity. So I want to ask why the channel not shows its anger on junior Rahul Gandhi.

To day Rahul took public meeting in the ground of mosque at Muradabad. Even he started his road shows from Muslim dominated area and approached to Deoband’s scholars to evoke them. Is his dynasty now Italian brand is more secular than Narshimha Rao? His mother Sonia spreads hates against Hindus and CM of Gujarat. She is secular to do so because she is Italian orign and Non-Hindu. Narendra Modi criticized appeasement policy of Congress. So he is communal.  Even though, he and his mother are the main figures for highlighting in that and other so called secular left leaning media. To day SP leader Amar Singh said that Congress is more communal than BJP.

Afzal case to go to European Parliament

Actually in the name of Human Right, related org and activist is more doing crime than the terrorist. Like that so called secularists are more communal than others. For them hanging of Saddam, his half brother and others are to save humanity but hanging of Afzal is a international crime.

On April 13, 2007 TOI and indiadaily reported the news related to above title. Ohers could not find or did not treat important.

South Asian human rights activists here are taking the case of Mohammed Afzal to the European parliament just in time for President A P J Kalam's visit to Brussels. This seems to be an attempt to put pressure on India not to hang him.

Afzal, who was sentenced to death five years ago for plotting the 2001 attack on the Indian parliament and whose mercy petition is pending before the President of India, has become the new focus of South Asian civil liberties campaigners here, who say there are ugly parallels between India's blasé attitude to a clear miscarriage of justice for an alleged terrorist and the US war on terror.

At the first ever meeting here to champion Afzal's cause, Moazzam Begg, one of nine Britons detained at Guantanamo Bay for unspecified crimes, drew parallels with Afzal.

Beg, who was released after three years of incarceration, said: "In India and Pakistan the authorities use torture daily to extract false confessions – this is taken for granted. It needs to be challenged because it has huge repercussions both for the individual concerned and on a wider political scale. The United States’ war on terror has given this use of inhuman torture a new legitimacy."

Beg added that Afzal's case merely underlined the international nature of the problem and said there was an urgent need for an international campaign to save him.

Activists and legal experts decided that the international campaign for Afzal would kick off with an urgent move to bring details of his case and the miscarriage of justice before the European Parliament.

Amrit Wilson of the South Asia Solidarity Group, which organised the meeting, said four British MPs – Jeremy Corbyn, Roger Godsiff, John McDonell and George Galloway – had already signed a letter to the Indian President urging him to show mercy to Afzal.

She said Afzal's case highlighted the life of a surrendered militant, with its unending harassment, torture and extortion. She said, “Both the forces of Hindutva and the use of the war on terror to further America's military and economic aims have led to an erosion of democracy and democratic values in India. In trying to bring Bush's version of 'democracy', India is becoming an authoritarian state."

In a sign of a gathering sub-continental support for Afzal, other speakers included Amjad Hussain, brother of Mirza Tahir Hussain, who was released last November after being on death row in Pakistan for 18 years.

Here in India are so many rainy frogs human activists active under different banners and being called by political democratic criminals as secular. One name among them is Arundhati Roy.

When Arundhati was in America, she said in an interview,” So, in India, the poor are the terrorists, and even states like Andhra Pradesh, we have thousands of people being held as political prisoners, called Maoists, held as political prisoners in unknown places without charges or with false charges. … say someone like myself, watching what is happening in Kashmir, where -- or in the northeast, where exactly what America is doing in Iraq, you know, where you're fostering a kind of civil war”

Now there is a time to know which media, human activists, and political parties and leaders are trading the interests of India. White paper should be published of them by every Indian time to time to make them nude instead of nude painting of Bharat Mata and Devi Sarswati. Is giving these facts communal?

In any event, the dialogue process has a not-so-invisible third party prodding and guiding from the back - a party that refuses to talk to Iran (on grounds it doesn't talk to "evil") but demands India kiss and make up with a military dictatorship that already has a lot of blood on its hands. It is because of this third-party role that, despite the qualitatively escalating and geographically expanding terrorism it confronts, India has huffed and puffed but stayed in the farcical peace process,” - Brahma Chellaney

Who are third parties who interfere in our internal matter? Who are their followers in India?

By Premendra Agrawal

agrawalpremendra@hotmail.com