Welcome to newsanalysisindia.com newsanalysis views reviews on current affair Dictator Mush and Democratic dynastic Kingdoms in India

Musharraf is a dictator of Pakistan. In India there are kingdoms of dynasties. Mush is not grooming any one of his family of his heir. India is greater than Pakistan due to the various dynastic kingdoms which are flourishing here with dictorial behaviour. Mush hammers on Judiciary of Pakistan. Here in India UPA government with Communist Parties wants to keep judiciary in their custody.

There are dynastic kingdoms of political parties. Was Lohpurush Vallabh Bhai Patel in mistake to bring so many kings and emperors under the umbrella of Independent India? Is our present democratic system correcting that mistake?

Under the June 3, 1947 plan, more than 600 princely states were given the option of joining either India or Pakistan, or choosing independence. Patel was understood the best man for the task of achieving unification of the princely states with the Indian dominion. Gandhi had said to Patel "the problem of the States is so difficult that you alone can solve it". He was considered a statesman of integrity with the practical acumen and resolve to accomplish a monumental task.

Patel invoked the patriotism of India's monarchs, asking them to join in the freedom of their nation and act as responsible rulers who cared about the future of their people. He persuaded the princes of 565 states of the impossibility of independence from the Indian republic, especially in the presence of growing opposition from their subjects. He proposed favourable terms for the merger, including creation of privy purses for the descendants of the rulers. While encouraging the rulers to act with patriotism, Patel did not rule out force, setting a deadline of 15 August 1947 for them to sign the instrument of accession document. All states willingly merged into the Indian union.

We celebrate indepence of India and our nation is being called greatest democratic country and second populated country of the world. Is it not ‘Dhol men pol’?

I notice a craze with royalty and monarchies. Along with headlines on news Web sites for stories on the Rahul’s Road shows, Indira’s shadow in Priyanka and Deshi bahu to Italian daughter. All eyes of media cameras’ are always on the body language of these Gandhis.

India media wouldn’t highlight this supposed news if people didn’t want to read it. Granted, the British monarchy in particular plays a more ceremonial and entertaining than political role in the lives of citizens of the United Kingdom. I think that our leaders and media are living in a fairy land to see the wings of Gandhi dynasty. So called seculars support to the democratic monarchy itself contradicts our democratic heights.

This is not to say that India is free of nepotism; the “Gandhi dynasty has shown its persistence in fighting its battles in and out of the country through its puppet government. Joint mechanism with Musharraf and free hand to the supporters of terrorists and naxalites are the examples.

Bill Clinton said “India is not a poverty stricken nation. My visit will help to correct this wrong impression of my fellow Americans that India is poor." Opposite to this our Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar loyalist of Congress queen was a beggar before the Nowrway Prince and Princess to say publicly “Bhikchham dehi”. How can Congress forget their dynastic kings and queens?

Why are we returning on the pre-independent era of Indian kingdoms? Are Sonia of Congress, Mulayam of Samajwadi Party, Mamta Banerjee of Trinmool Congress, Shivsena of Thakrey, NCP of Sharad Pawar, RJD of Lalu, SAD (B) of Prakash Sigh Badal, Ajit Singh of Rashtriya lok Dal, Chautala of INLD, Karunanidhi of DMK, Jayalalitha of AIDMK, Naidu of Telgu Desham, Patnaik of BJD, Farooq of Natonal Conference, Saeed of PDP and like that so on nunning their parties as dynastic kingdoms to wear the mask of democracy?

Are we under the democracy in real sense? Do our present political parties not follow dynastic kingdom to wear the mask of democracy? Is this not crime in democracy? Is this not the insult of Iron man of India Vallabh Bhai Patel and freedom fighters?

Who are the culprits in the name of democracy doing this crime? Who are the Queen and Rajkumar dreaming to rule India to wear the mask of democracy? There are so many terrorists in J&K who have got identity cards and Indian citizenship by fraud. There are so many Bangladeshis who received ration cards and enrolled their names in the voterlist with the help of Congress and Left. Legally now foreigners can be PM of India. Will that situation be to save India or to push India further towards the slavery?

For hundreds of Years India was under the Mogul Dynastic rule, then came the British rule, also Dynastic and now we have the Nehru / Gandhi Dynasty.

Can any true Indian claim to be really independent and say they live in a real Democratic Country? In a Country of 100 crores is there no real India born leader who can be elected by people to run their Government for them, do they need puppet leaders who has no say in anything and has to ask foreign born’ permission even to speak.

They have no accountability towards Indian people. They owned house in Italy but not in India. Every step of them is in the suspicion. Dynastic small parties are fish and shark may be called Gandhi dynasty.

Actually we are not enjoying real democracy.Janata regime was that short time of some what democracy but our nation remains in shadows of dynasty rules as in the past dynastic kingdoms..

I feel very upset when i see the modern 'yuvraj' Rahul Gandhi is getting a grand honour from so called public and wasted interested media is also glorifying this foreign born boy.