Soniaism Marxism Breach of Previledge Lok Sabha Home Minister
Shivraj Patil Permission from CM Chhattisgarh Raipur Naxal
Maoist Central Govt Human Actist PUCL Candidate for
Presidentship Code word UPA Parliament;
govt serves daily more than 56 bhogs of issues before the
parliament. MPs are confused what they eat first. If, they lift one
bhog of problem then atonce comes another more sweeted. Patil gave a
false statement in the Lok Sabha about the naxal problem in
Chhattisgarh. Why not previledge motion against the minister?
On May 15, Home Minister replied in Lok Sabha during a
supplementary question that Central Govt wants to control the
naxal problem of Chhattisgarh but the government of Chhattisgarh
does not give the permission for that. Have you heard bigger than
this the misguided statements?
He said that
naxal incidents of Chhattisgarh are of greatest number in the
country. Central Govt has given more help to Chhattisgarh in
cmparison to other states. The State Government there not does its
duty properly. Central governmet wants permission of Chhattishgarh
government to tackle the problem but the state government does not
give that. He said 40% total naxal violent incidents occurred in
CG and 60% death of the total nubers comes from the Chhattishgarh.
BJP members wanted from Shivraj Patil for taking his allegation
back. Somnat Chatterjee did not give permission for this because
in question hour no discussion would be allowed.
Are naxalites not
There may be other
reasons also. Lok Sabha Speaker has said that naxalites are not
criminals. Does it mean the police who are fighting against naxalites to
sacrifice their lives are criminals? He welcomed the Maoist inflenced
iGovernment in Nepal. Second reason may be that he wants support of the
UPA government for his pobable Presdidentship candidature. Today Left
has given indication that there will be comrade Somnath as a candidate
for the presidenship.
contradicted the Patil’s statement
Chief Minister of
Chhattisgarh Dr Raman Singh asked Home Minisnister when state government
did not allow Central Government for tackling the naxal problem in the
state in the past three years. He said to the office of “Nai Duniya”
Hindi daily by phone that Patils should inform about the date of
refusal. Chhattisgarh attitude has never been non-co-operaive. The State
Government has always requested for taking tougher step against the
naxal violence. In the past state government has requested central
government for the movement against the naxal violence. Opposite to this
Central government has no plan for the joint movement and the central
government left all eight states alson for tackling the naxal
problem?Instead of giving statement, central government should show it
might to tackle the naxal prolem. Chhattisgarh state government has
always advocated for soloving the naxal problem in the direction of the
centre with the help of othere effected states.
condemned Home Minister Patil
Home Mininster also said that the aim of central government and state
government is to tackle the naxal problem. Then on what basis Patil has
said that state government does not give permission to tackle the
problem. Why is his baseless allegation now? He never alleged before
that! There have been so many joint meetings of state ministers with the
Cntral Home Ministry regarding naxal problems. But never he or his
ministry raised this issue.
Patil’s answer not amounting to breach of privilege?
lt is well-settled
that making a misleading statement deliberately may be treated as breach
of privilege and contempt of the House. The House may treat the making
of a deliberately misleading statement as contempt.
Does the act of the
Home Minister Patil not mislead or tend to mislead and not be done
wilfully with the intention to mislead or deceive? Is the element of
deliberateness not in the alleged offence of deliberately misleading the
House? Parliamentarian expers think that Patil’s statement was not only
wrong or misleading but it was made deliberately to mislead the House. [Kaul
and Shakdher, 3rd Edn., Vol. I, p. 234]
The charge of
misleading of the House is only sustained on one of the following
(i) That the Minister
made a statement which he knew was false; or (ii) that he made a
statement which he did not himself believe to be true; or (iii) that he
made a statement without due care and attention and negligently
asserting something as true which turned out to be false of statement is
utterly indifferent whether what he is saying is true or false. No
person is expected to make a statement about a fact as to which he made
no enquiry to ascertain its truth or falsehood. If he does so, he must
pay the price for his negligence and indiscretion should it later turn
out that what he asserted was false and thus misled the House.
Who is true? Is
Central home Minister or CM of Chhatttisgarh state true? Both can’t be
true. One definitely is liar. Both are responsible personalities in the
eyes of the public.
In a past case of an
alleged misleading the House, the Minister concerned laid on the Table a
statement correcting his answer to a question and the Chairman did not
consider that there was any intention on the part of the Minister to
mislead the House.
So liar should come
before the parliament or state assembly of the Chhattisgarh? In Sonia
raj there is no Ram Rajya. So there is no need of ‘Agni pariksha’. But
in the gandhigiri also truth must be come before the public.
CPI (M) wing PUCL
Peoples Union for Civil Liberties is active in Chhattisgarh as a
supported hand to the naxal Maoists. Its General Secretary Vinayak sen
is arrested by police on May 13 because of his linking with the
naxalites. Few days back one naxalite Guha in the shape of a business
man of tendu leaves was arrested with three letters which were being
delived to the nsaxalite leaders in the jail of Chhattishgarh. At that
time also this PUCL came to save the Guha in the name of humanity.This
is the civil liberty movement of Marxism. This naxal Maoism has spread
in Mumbai and Nagpur also. But our Home Minister said that naxal is not
such great problem as given publicity. President of PUCL says arrest of
Vinayak Sen and Guha are illegal because both are human acivists. This
is the Human right of Soniaism and Marxism.
Code words of
naxlites which can be understand only by the Human activists under the
left supported seculary communal UPA government. Naxal Code Words Santra
or Nagpur, Aam for Amravati Like the above Peepal, Khajur and Bar are
for other cities. It may sound like the recipe of a fruit salad, but is
much more sinister than that. These are some codes by which Naxalites
reportedly refer to cities in Maharashtra.
Naxalite son of Shivraj Patil
Busted armed factory
of naxalites in Bhopal is in the name of Diwakar Patil allias Yalwarthy.
When asked the mentioning his father’s name as Shivraj Patil then he
replied that in sharp contrast, on April 24, 2005, at a high level
meeting with Ministers, Government officials, Opposition leaders and
intellectuals at Bangalore, Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil stated : “
The Government is not interested in using weapons. They (the Naxalites)
are our brothers and sisters and we know that this is a socio-economic
problem rather than one of law and order. We can solve these problems
through dialogue and discussions.” Diwakar allias Yalwarthy said that
since that date he considered Shivrj Patil as his father to enroll him
as his father in every document that might be electric and water bill or
factory registration and rent receipt.
Is the security of the country and safety of our country may be saved in
such confused coward hands led by foreign borns?
By Premendra Agrawal
Why Shivraj Patil has five Guns and Naxal enrolled
him as his father?