Readers speak in
TOI on “Favoritism will set bad precedent”
* It ain't true
for all
* Unjust use of
power
* He has brought
shame to Indians
* A good idea
* Strict
penalties should be imposed
* The suggestion
is welcome
* Women are no
less than men
Dog vs
man in cities and Sanjay Dutt vs other accused in TADA Court
Debate is
useless: Dog vs man in cities. Dog can sniff terrorists but we
can’t. India tv scanned yesterday a live clipping of Bhavanipatana
Dist Kalahandi of Orissa. One orphaned newly born monkey is milking
female dog daily. Both love each other more than us.
A stray dog
created a furor in the Maharashtra Assembly before two days.
Two children dyed
due to the bite of stray dogs are biting children Even though there
is protest in various places for not killing the dogs. When we give
more honor to dogs than how can we not give honor to the accused of
93 blasts ?
Enemy
Pakistan and villain of kargil is greatest friend
Our government
wants peace. So it treats Pakistan not enemy though India could be
forced by it to fight three wars. Manmohan’s most reliable friend is
Musharraf, villain of Kargil. Our PM showed this to adopt joint
mechanism against terrorism.
Terrorists and Naxals are brothers and children
In the eyes of
our secular government terrorists and Naxalites all are equal to
those who become victims of these. Home Minister Shivraj patil has
aready said that they are their brothers and children. So a naxal
who caught in Bhopal mention Shivraj patil as his father.
SIMI Vs
MP Yogi Adityanath
Ban on SIMI by
NDA government was opposed by Sonia Gandhi, Cabinet Ministers Ambika
Soni and Sri Prakash Jaiswal. Few days before Mulayam’s withdrew the
cases against SIMI chief and others to utilize them in the coming
election. Mulayam Government framed charges against MP Yogi and sent
him jail without reasoning. MPs of Congress and Samajwadi party are
joking when MP Yogi Adityanath was weeping in the Parliament. Still
people say that seculars are unjust and Court favored Sanjay Dutt!
Is Abu
Azmi not in Rajya Sabha?
So how can we see
injustice with the accused in TADA court? Abu Azmi was accused in 93
blast but now not only he is free but even he is a member of Rajya
Sabha on the ticket of Samajwadi Party. Is this injustice?
Tilak Vs
Gandhi
Shivaji killed
Afjal Khan when Afjal attempted to stab Shivaji so secular called
Shivaji communal. Even Lokmanya Tilak and Savarka be written as
terrorist in NCERT and IGNOU books. We know only Gandhi and
Gandhigiri, nothing else.
Afzal
Guru vs Dhanjay Chatterjee
Congress, PDP and CPI (M) moved for pardon to Afzal who got death
penalty from the Supreme Court in the case of parliament attack.
They saved Afzal Guru from hanging? We are secular so we could see
the hanging of Dhanjay Chatterjee!
Afzal
Guru and Abu Salem toa ban gaye gentle men
About 20,000
posters and banners of the kurta clad don have been put up across
the constituency wishing people for Id and Diwali as part of a
"goodwill-cum-sympathy" campaign. He is going to contest in the
assembly election of UP. Afzal Guru can also say “Main toa ban gayaa
gentle man!”. In our country even a terrorist may be PM. Our PM
Manmohan Singh says inclusion of tainted personalities in the
cabinet is the compulsion of Alliance government. Then how can any
one blame seculars that they are partial?
Afzal’s
son vs Martyrs’ sons
President Kalam
met Afzal Guru’s seven-year-old son Ghalib accompanied Guru’s wife
and so called human activists. But President could not find time to
meet the children of such martyrs who sacrificed their lives to save
lives of hidden half culprits sitting in the parliament. Are we not
100% pure seculars?
We want
refugees and infiltrators
Kashmiri Pandits are drove away on gun point from the kashmir. Their
forefather are Pandit nehru and his father Moilal nehru. They are
moving without shed in the streets of Delhi near 10 Janpath.
We want votes. So Congreess and CPI (M) welcomes the infiltration
from Bangladesh. They got raton cards. Their names are in the
voterlist.
Bribe to riot victims
Our Prime
Minister has announced for giving seven lakh to each family of the
victims in Gujarat riots but secular Government will not give a
single paisa to the family of the karsevaks who were burnt in the
Sabrmati Express compartment at Godhara.
Massacre
of 1984
Yes we are not
partial so up till now not a single person or leader could find
punishment for the murder of hundreds and hundreds Sikhs in 1984 in
anti-Sikh riots.
Equal
Opportunity
Yes we want to
give equal opportunity so a youth of poor upper cast family can’t be
got reservation but a youth of creamy layer OBC can get.
Equal
Share to minority
Our secular
government doesn’t want to give equal share to all including Muslims
on the economic basis. But it want to count religious heads for this
purpose. Government is identifying minority villages, cities and
provinces so they can get especial economic package in wholesole.
Gandhi
dynasty is a Reserve Caste for PM post
When Congress
reserved the PM post for Gandhi dynasty in an invocative democratic
way as Hitler and Mao had done. But objection rose on in the name of
Italian origin. So, Congress invented a hidden Super PM post for
their Italian born leader. Congress treats Videshi bahu as Deshi
bahu and Deshi bahu as Videshi bahu. Like that seculars honor the
wishes of people and the Indian culture.
Natwar Vs
Sonia Gandhi
Natwar Singh was
charge sheeted but on the same ground Sonia Gandhi could not be
charge sheeted in the scam of Food for Oil. Member of Gandhi dynasty
can’t be punished in any scam including Bofors even if that member
becomes accused.
Gandhighat is reserved
Gandhighat is now
reserved for only the dead members of Gandhi dynasty. Former PM late
natsimha Rao could not find the place there.
Shibu
Soren
Congress made
corrupt Shibu Soren and others JMM MPs corrupt. Congress feels
guilty conscious. So Congress now does not ask resignation of Shibu
Soren though he got life punishement.
Sanjay got preferential treatment: Lawyer
In a potentially
embarrassing development for Sanjay Dutt, his lawyer, Satish
Maneshinde, has been caught on TV admitting that a Tada court may
have given the actor preferential treatment.
The 'sting', telecast by a private channel, has Maneshinde
questioning the Tada's court's decision to absolve Dutt of terror
charges under Tada while those who delivered weapons and grenades to
the star — a part of the blast arsenal — were being charged under
the tough law.
"People in the chain have been convicted under Tada but he (Dutt)
has been spared. Even people who didn't know what was in the bag
have been convicted under Tada," Maneshinde said, according to a
press release put out by the TV channel.
When contacted by TOI late Friday evening, Maneshinde said," They
(the channel) are not showing the full interview, but broadcasting
just bits and pieces of the conversation."
The lawyer added that he may contemplate action against the channel.
"I haven't thought about it yet, but that's a strong possibility."
The lawyer, who has achieved celebrity status defending "difficult"
cases for people such as Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray and actor
Priyanka Chopra, has said that if Dutt was spared from Tada
provisions, so should others named in the case.
This is likely to spur relatives of those convicted under Tada to
protest; some of them have already made the point that Dutt was
being spared due to his superstar status. Maneshinde has said that
Supreme Court could make things difficult for Dutt.
11 applications
still to be decided before the order comes
There
are eleven applications still pending before the court as on March
14. These include two applications of Sanjay Dutt, one seeking
probation and the other for extension of bail.
There is an application by 67 out of 100 convicts seeking parity
with Sanjay Dutt as far as removal of charges under TADA are
concerned. Also, there are three other applications from Yususf
Nalwala, Rusi Mulla and Kersi Adajania seeking benefits under the
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
In one of the applications before the case it is mentioned that
there should be retrial as the entire trial spanning more than 13
years has been following the wrong procedure.
There have been allegations against the prosecution, the CBI and
almost everyone involved with the trial. Special Public Prosecutor
Ujjwal Nikam said that there has been one more application that says
that certain accused have been forced to file false applications
making allegations.