Obama is inspired by the lives of Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi and William Henry Seward who fought lifelong against the slavery and racism. The subject of this is to explain: “Victory of Obama is the defeat of Gandhi-Vadra”

Before the Civil War, African Americans were legally denied equal rights and freedoms pursuant to formally valid codes prescribing the relations between master and slave. The same is happening in the Sonia Gandhi’s Congress led UPA government. This government treats Gandhis and Vadra above the probe and others are under the probe.

There is a probe against the alleged corruption of opposition leaders including and even few Congress leaders but there is no probe against the alleged corruption of Gandhis and Vadra.  There are probes against the Jagmohan Reddy, Kalmadi, A. Raja also. But later Congress promoted Kalmadi and A.Raja both. If Jaganmohan becomes ready to follow the path of corrupt congress leadership then CIB probe may be dropped against him and may replace the present CM of Andhra!

Rajamohan Reddy is the son of former CM of Andhra but due to his revolt against the Congress he is being punished by the CBI. CBI probes alleged disproportionate wealth case on Y S Jaganmohan Reddy but CBI can’t do the same with Vadra. 

(Reuters) - The Indian government ruled out an inquiry into allegations of improper dealings between the son-in-law of India's most powerful politician, Sonia Gandhi, and property developer DLF Ltd, even as the firm's shares plunged on the claims. 

Latest example is the investigation going on against the Gadkari’s so called firms. Here question does not relate to the validity of the probes against Gadakari. Question is: Have people of democratic free India equal rights and freedom as Gandhis and Vadras? In the eyes Gandhis and Vadras they are masters and others are slaves. Romelila: Magic of grabbing Rs 1600 crores plus from 50 lakhs? 

Perhaps they feel that they are masters due to their birth link with Italy and Scotland. The British also felt the same and still racism is there in their blood.   From where Vadra and Rahul hired their CORRUPTION-GUIDE  

Before the Civil War, African Americans were legally denied equal rights and freedoms pursuant to formally valid codes prescribing the relations between master and slave. Even though these codes were de jure fully suitable for application in legal practice, yet their enforcement by the then U.S. government de facto violated basic human rights of a significant part of the population. William H. Seward famously proclaimed that slavery is forbidden under "a higher law than the Constitution."

Generally speaking, the occurrence of such "justly enacted unjust laws" fully depends on the stance taken by the country's political leadership towards the rule of law principle.

In some countries, the political leaders assert that the rule of law is purely a procedural concept. Therefore, they argue that any government may strip its subjects of their fundamental freedoms or infringe their vital interests so long as this is done by way of a duly implemented legal mechanism. For example, at the Nuremberg trials, in an attempt to justify their crimes against Jewish and Romany population of Europe during World War II, some of the former leaders of Nazi Germany argued that they had broken none of the laws effective when Hitler had been in power. It was only by invoking the rule according to a higher law that the Allied prosecutors were able to legitimately overcome such defenses.

In other countries, conversely, the political leaders assert that all written laws must be kept in line with the universal principles of morality, fairness, and justice. These leaders argue that, as a necessary corollary to the axiom that "no one is above the law," the rule of law requires the government to treat all persons equally under the law. However, the proclaimed right to equal treatment is susceptible to instantly becoming void each time the government denies a sufficient level of respect, dignity, and autonomy to a certain class of individuals or to human rights in general." Therefore, the unwritten and universally self-explanatory principles of equality, autonomy, dignity, and respect are said to overrule conventional written laws enacted by the government. It is these principles that are often referred to as "natural law." They also constitute the basis of the "higher law theory." 

William Henry Seward (May 16, 1801 – October 10, 1872) was the 12th Governor of New York, United States Senator and the United States Secretary of State under Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson of Republican. He was a determined opponent of the spread of slavery in the years leading up to the American Civil War

Obama is the true follower of William Henry Seward though Obama is democrat and William H Seward was Republican. Seward was the promoter of equal rights and freedom. But Gandhi -Vadras and their government were against both principles. There is no probe against them.

span style=

Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee has denied permission to the request of BJP minority members to sing the national song in the precincts of Parliament on September 7, 2006. This Article has full discussion on this.

Lok Sabha Secretariat sources said the Speaker had denied permission citing the rules governing the Parliament to 200 BJP Minority Morcha members to sing Vande Matram, the national song to commemorate its centenary.

Aug 07, 2005 and Sept 07, 2006?

In 1905, the freedom movement had taken an organized shape and the same year country’s politics took a new turn with the announcement of Swadeshi Movement on August 07, 1905 at Calcutta. The declaration of Swadeshi movement is completing its 100 years on August 07' 2005. But we could not get fully ‘Swadeshi’ Govt. We are under Congress led Left supported UPA government. Election symbol of Congress is ‘Hand’ which is now in the control of Videshi hand.

It may be recalled that the song of Vandematram was adopted as National Song on September 07, 1905. On the occasion of completing 100 years of this historic occasion National Committee for the centenary celebration of Vandematram and Freedom Movement Memorial Committee was celebrating this event. With a view to creating awareness among students regarding national integration and love for the country, all State Government have been informed by the Central Govt. for taking the decision to celebrate September 07 as Vandematram Day.

Here I want to draw attention towads Mahatma Gandhi and Dr.Hedgewar. The prayer meetings of Mahatma Gandhi used to begin with ‘Vande Mataram’. Founder of Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar was expelled from school in Nagpur due to “Vande Mataram agitation”. Is this the reason for Arjun Singh and lalu declaring the ‘Vandematram’ singing a subject of choice to support Gandhi and to oppose Dr Hedgewar? Who doesn’t want to sing, keep themselves in their homes? Why patriotism is a subject of choice?

Is Fatwa against singing Vandematram not jihad?

Why not a single maulvi sends a fatwa aginst those who do not sing ‘Vandematram’? Why not secular Muslims say thow who don’t sing ‘Vandematram’ will go to hell? Is fatwa greater than the law of the land and the order of the central government? Is jihadi maulvis want to establish parallel govt. as doing by Naxalites? Naxalites are brothers and children of Home Minister and they are not criminals as said by Lok Sabha speaker.

These fatwa’s should be treated as the conspiracy against India. Don’t the Muslim children go to Christian schools sing psalms from the Bible in the morning assembly like ‘Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name’? Do they come back home losing their faith?

Are Maulvis not making ’sijda’ (bow) before anyone except Allah. Where’s the controversy except in the minds of the misguiding fundamentalists?

In March 2004 Fifty-four Muslims have been excommunicated and their marriages nullified by a priest in Agra after they reportedly expressed the view that singing Vande Mataram was not un-Islamic. While issuing the fatwa, Mufti Abdul Quddus Rumi declared that singing of the national song 'would lead those (Muslims) to hell.'

Opposite to the above now in August 2006 in Agra Muslim youth ended his eight-day fast to protest a fatwa (religious ruling) against the singing of India's national song Vande Mataram in schools.

Parliamentarians are for making law

Then why Lok Sabha Speaker not allowed BJP to sing ‘Vandematram’ in the parliament? Why parliamentarians don’t make law before Sept 07, so BJP can fullfil its wishes? Why only BJP? All should come forward in this cause.

Parliamentarians make law to raise their salaries. They can avoid the instructions of the President on Office of Profit Bill and can pass the bill to save Somanth Chatterjee and others.

They can pass privilege motion against the well known personality in parliament proceedings Subhash Kashyap on the instruction of Lok Sabha Speaker. Congress unsuccessfully tried to move privilege motion agains former external minister Jaswant Singh.

They could not pass the law to bar the PM for including tainted members in his cabinet.

Is there no law and authority in the Home Ministry to serve the non-bailable warrant to Sadhu yadav brother in law of Railway Minister? Why Delhi Police did not arrest him when whole world saw violence of Sadhu Yadave in the Loksabha? Was there any fatwa from super pm?

Now Abu Salem is going to be a gentleman in coming UP assembly election. Why such law by which these anti-nationals would not be a candidate. Otherwise time will come when a terrorist will be a PM one day as Italian origin tried in the past.

NAIK, SHRI RAM: first Member of Parliament to get consecutively Elected four times in Mumbai. He succeeded in introducing national song, ‘Vandematram’ in Parliament and also in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai. In previous election filmi ‘Govinda aala re’ came to defeat Naikji. He became ‘Neta’ to sing ‘Vande Matrome’.

Now voters may issue warrant against Govinda. They are anxiously searching him.

In the next election Naik should come again, so we can see the law by which, singing ‘Vandematram’ will be compulsory for every Indians every son of Bharat mata.

Was Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad Anti-Islam?

While listening to a rendition of Vande Mataram in 1952 by a renowned maestro, Krishna Kumar, in Delhi, Maulana Azad admired it saying it was graceful and inspiring as great luminaries like Rabindranath Tagore, Surendranath Banerjee, Satyabhushan Gupta, R.N. Bose and others had sung it.  Muslims should not get carried away by a few lines of the song as nobody is asking them to bow down. They must learn a lesson from Maulana Azad. On the occasion of the inauguration of the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR), Maulana sahib’s forehead was smeared with a tilak at which Dawn, a Pakistani daily, commented in a cartoon that he changed his religion to Hinduism. At that, Maulana said that in fact by such participation, his faith in his religion strengthens more. Muslims must learn from his example.

Muslim Leaders espedially of Congress should remember Pt Nehru:

‘Vande Matram’ has history of revolutionaries went to gallows singing vande matram (that includes asfaqullah khan). It was a major inspirational song during freedom struggle. D V Paluskar sang vande Mataram at a Congress meeting in 1915. Subsequently, freedom fighters persuaded him to sing it regularly at the annual Congress conferences

'Vande Mataram' is obviously and indisputably the premier national song of India, with a great historical tradition, and intimately connected with our struggle for freedom. That position it is bound to retain and no other song can displace it. It represents the position and poignancy of that struggle.

By Premendra Agrawal