Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill to hammer unity-symbol of Loh Purush Patel

PCTV Bill:Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill to hammer unity-symbol of Loh Purush Patel

Nehru and Jinnah divided India in the line of religion to be PMs of their respective countries. Due to this Mahatma Gandhi’s conveyed his last wish to abolish Congress Party.

newsanalysisindia @newsanalysisind17h

@rammadhavrss @Vande_Mataram Jayalalitha presented documentary evidence in Tamil Nadu Assembly of Gandhi’s last wish:newsanalysisindia.com/post/Mahatma-G

 

 

Dear All,
This is a very serious matter concerning Hindus and hence no media, newspapers or TV news channels is discussing it.

Forward this message to a minimum of twenty people on your contact list; and in turn ask each of them to do likewise.

In three days, most people in India will have this message.

“Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill” (PCTV Bill)

Read carefully what Dr. Subramanian Swamy has analysed about that Bill:

Minority institutions including Jamait-e-Ulema are forcing Congress for passing this bill. Congress wants this bill to win 2014 election with ‘Minority’ votes.

Salient features of The Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill- PCTV Bill :-

1) Based on the presumption that all ‘Hindus are Criminals and Rioters’ ,this law can be invoked only against Hindus by minorities. (the bill defines Muslims, Christians etc. as “the Minority Group” in (sec 3.e))

2) Merely a complaint will be sufficient to file a FIR and the Hindu against whom the complaint is made, will be immediately arrested and assumed guilty UNLESS PROVEN otherwise (In normal criminal procedure, an accused is assumed innocent unless proven guilty);

3) All crimes under this Bill are Cognizable and Non-bailable [Clause 56 of may 2011 version];

4) It can trigger a new wave of extortion by minority groups against Hindus, the majority of whom are the working and business class. This will have colossal negative repercussions for the Indian economy.

5) Section 129 states that for prosecution of offences under Sec 9 there will be no limitation of time. It means a ‘Minority’ can reopen all cases against Hindus, all past cases right from 1950 onwards.

6) Under Sec. 42, A minority witness giving false statement before National authority CANNOT be prosecuted for giving FALSE evidence against a Hindu.
___________________________

Summary ?
Just like Pakistan, Bangladesh or Kashmir,
Hindus will be left with 3 options:
(i) Convert
(ii) Flee
(iii) Suffer entire life

So oppose this Anti-Hindu, Anti-Bharat Bill by making all Hindus aware of its dangers and unite to fight it and remove the Anti-Hindu & Anti-Bharat party who drafted this bill, or be prepared for above 3 options left for you & your children.
___________________________

(NAC download link for bill- http://nac.nic.in/pdf/pctvb.pdf)
– – – – – 
Once again reminding you to take this matter very seriously, understand and discuss with your family & friends & share to spread awareness. 

Forward this message to a minimum of twenty people on your contact list; and in turn ask each of them to do likewise.

In three days, most people in India will have this message.

If Gandhi’s last wish would be fulfilled then Neither Nehru and Indira nor Rajiv Gandhi had be Prime Ministers and had got ‘Bharat Ratna’ from their own Congress Governments. Non-Nehru Gandhi dynasty PM Narsimha Rao had honored Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel to announce Bharat Ratn for him in 1991 and in the same year Rajiv Gandhi also got Bharat Ratn. J. L. Nehru got Bharat Ratna in 1955, Indira G in 1971. Is this not great insult of Vallabh Bahi Patel by Nehru Gandhi Dynasty?

Pt Nehru who was the responsible of Kashmir and Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel who was the responsible for the rest of the states. The states wanted to remain free without doing merger.

 

What happened in Kashmir we know?  Opposite to this Vallabh Bhai Patel succeeded in his effort. Today we see the India due to him. Due to this Sardar Patel was considered a statesman of integrity means unification of India. After Patel he reminded .Lal Bahadur Shastri’s slogan of Jai Jawan; Jai Kisan that led to “revolution” on the foodgrains production front with the country being self-sufficient in this regard even today 

 

This event formed the cornerstone of Patel’s popularity in post-independence era and even today, he is remembered as the man who united India. He is, in this regard, compared to Otto von Bismarck of Germany, who did the same thing in 1860s. Under the 3 June plan, more than 562 princely states were given the option of joining either India or Pakistan, or choosing independence. Indian nationalists and large segments of the public feared that if these states did not accede, most of the people and territory would be fragmented. The Congress as well as senior British officials considered Patel the best man for the task of achieving unification of the princely states with the Indian dominion. Gandhi had said to Patel “the problem of the States is so difficult that you alone can solve it”.

 

He was considered a statesman of integrity with the practical acumen and resolve to accomplish a monumental task. Patel asked V. P. Menon, a senior civil servant with whom he had worked over the partition of India, to become his right-hand as chief secretary of the States Ministry. On 6 May 1947, Patel began lobbying the princes, attempting to make them receptive towards dialogue with the future Government and trying to forestall potential conflicts. Patel used social meetings and unofficial surroundings to engage most monarchs, inviting them to lunch and tea at his home in Delhi. At these meetings, Patel stated that there was no inherent conflict between the Congress and the princely order. Nonetheless, he stressed that the princes would need to accede to India in good faith by 15 August 1947. Patel invoked the patriotism of India’s monarchs, asking them to join in the freedom of their nation and act as responsible rulers who cared about the future of their people. He persuaded the princes of 565 states of the impossibility of independence from the Indian republic, especially in the presence of growing opposition from their subjects. He proposed favourable terms for the merger, including creation of privy purses for the descendants of the rulers. While encouraging the rulers to act with patriotism, Patel did not rule out force, setting a deadline of 15 August 1947 for them to sign the instrument of accession document. All but three of the states willingly merged into the Indian union—only Jammu and Kashmir, Junagadh, and Hyderabad did not fall into his basket………….link

 

Leave a Reply