Congress is on ventilation taking nitrogen from AAP to follow mass suicide cult

Tags: Congress, Congress is on ventilation, Nitrogen from AAP, Mass Suicide culture, AAP Cult, Haven’s gate

Congress is on ventilation taking nitrogen from AAP to follow mass suicide cult

 Congress follows mass suicide cult+ure of Anarchists without arm clones of Maoists.

These suicide-politicians follow:  TOP 10 DEADLIEST CULTS


AAP Cult suicide for Congress is in the tune of Heaven’s Gate, Order of the Solar Temple,Peoples Temple – Jones Town, Ten Commandments of God, Scientology, Suicide bombing & World Church of the Creator.


Sometimes all members commit suicide at the same time and place. In other cases, certain denominations apparently supported mass suicide, but did not necessarily encourage all members to do it.


AAP Cult mass suicide for Congress is that phenomenon by which Congress and other fake seculars, in this context often called AAP to defam e“Aam Aadami” which actually should be called “Anarchy Cult”, have led to their members and their blind followers political suicide.


Peoples Temple (Jim Jones)

In November 1978, 914 American followers of Jim Jones died in a mass murder/suicide inJonestown, Guyana.

Some of them said that they kill themselves while casting it as a political act: “We didn’t commit suicide, we committed an act of revolutionary suicide protesting the conditions of an inhumane world.”


Congress sleeping at ventilation wants to take nitrogen from Maoists, leftist and rightist-India Last thinkers think that they can’t live with India fist thinkers nationalis.


“torture hole,” a well. Jones had terrified the children by making them believe that there was a monster living at the bottom of the well, which was in fact Jones’s henchmen who pulled and tugged the children’s legs as they descended into the well.

The mass suicides that were to make Jonestown notorious were rehearsed during so called “white nights.” In an affidavit, Peoples Temple defector Deborah Layton wrote that during one of these white nights, people were told that they would die, and were forced to drink unsweetened Flavor Aid that they were told contained poison. The few who were hesitant to drnk were engaged in a debate and quickly complied. Only after everyone drank the concoction were they informed that there was no poison, and that it was all just a test of loyalty and faith in Jones. This is where the phrase, “drinking the kool-aid” come from.


What type of Italian made conspiracy is being manufactured in 10 Janpath in the guidance of Rahul Gandhi’s political guru Yogendra Yadav and his anarchist companions? “Yah andar ki baat hai”


Jonestown itself became a “ghost town” after 1978 and was mostly destroyed by a fire in the mid-1980s, after which the ruins were left to decay. In 1987, The Jonestown Carnage: A CIA Crime (1978) by S.F. Alinin, B.G. Antonov and A.N. Itskov was published in theUSSR. The book says Jones’ group was not religious but rather socialist, opposing imperialism and the US government. The Soviet embassy head in Guyana, Feodor Timofeyev, visited Jonestown earlier in 1978, praising it for being a socialist haven, wagging its collective finger in the face of the US government.


Movement for the Restoration of the Ten Commandments of God

On March 17, 2000, between 780 and 1000 members of the Movement for the Restoration of the Ten Commandments of God died in a probable mass suicide in Uganda.


The group had splintered from (Sonia Maino’s) Roman Catholicism to emphasize apocalypticism and alleged Marian apparitions. They also deemed the wider world to be corrupt via so many corruption gates of Congress Govt 2G, Coalgate, Railgate, Vvip chopper-gate etc.


Solar Temple

From 1994 to 1997, the Order of the Solar Temple’s members became so paranoid they began a series of mass suicides. some members had personally donated over $1 million to the cult’s leader, Joseph Di Mambro.


India has largest numbers millionaires and foreign sponsored so many uncounted invisible millionaires.  U S, Pak, China want to destabilize India. From these sources funding is coming to these anarchists as we saw in the funding by ford foundation of Sonia’s Italian village.


Heaven’s Gate

On March 26, 1997, 39 followers believed that they were merely “exiting their human vehicles” so that their souls could go on a journey aboard a spaceship they believed to be following comet Hale-Bopp.


For getting heaven’s get fake seculars anarchists in the rallied front of Rail Bhawan to disturb Republic Day in Delhi and later drama of dharnas and candle lighting by Rahul Gandhi against his Congress Party government at centre and by Kejriwal being a CM against his Delhi State government. Like that so many dramas are going on.  


World Church of the Creator

Ben Klassen formed the white supremacist group currently called the Creativity Movement. He wrote a book called The White Man’s Bible which called suicide “an honorable and dignified way to die for any … of a number of reasons, such as having come to the decision that life is no longer worthwhile.” After the death of his wife he practiced what he preached and committed suicide.


Are Congressmen on the guideline of anarhissts’ AAP sheeps to follow sucide? Why is there not a single FIR against these leaders who want to suicide?



A considerably weaker suspicion indicates Scientology caused a number of suicides actively, or through negligence. For example, according to Flo Conway, a researcher at theUniversity of Oregon, Scientologists are taught that if they abandon the “church” they will soon kill themselves or have a serious illness or accident.



Some argue that martyrdom, as found in religions such as Christianity or Islam, is tantamount to suicide. This argument states that by accepting or even inviting their own death the martyr is committing something like assisted suicide.


Most mainstream religions traditionally forbid members to take their own lives.


Martyrdom generally involves losing one’s life, usually passively, at the hands of non-believers because of one’s religious beliefs or practices.

Jehad has strongly encouraged many Muslims to accept a theology in which becoming asuicide bomber is not considered suicide. Instead it is described by the extremists as a “martyrdom operation” of a ‘Holy war’………………..contd


Don’t say Akhand Bharat, Say Akhand Pakistan: Congress?

Tags: Don’t say Akhand Bharat, Akhand Pakistan, Congress, Hafiz Saeed, RAW officer Singh, PoK

“Is the Congress with India or with Pakistan? They should come clear on it,” Yashwant Sinha told the Lok Sabha.

Hafiz Saeed is running his terrorist network racket in India with knowledge of Govt: Former Raw Officer

Former RAW officer Singh revealed on July 7 at Indea News channel: Hafiz Saeed is running his terrorist network racket in India with knowledge of Govt. And return of this Hafiz Saeed is the helping hand for sending the black corrupt money of Congress abroad by Hawala.    


I, we ourselves are responsible for the killing of our five soldiers. Not a single leader of our country is responsible for that. Why shouldAntony resign? We ourselves are culprit to keep Congress in power. After allAntony is the first lined confident member of Sonia Gandhi.


The UPA must immediately take the nation into confidence, if its intention is to surrender Kashmir. If that is indeed the case, the people of India have a right to know why, and on whose behalf, such surrender is being envisaged.


Rahul Gandhi present heir of Nehru is learning lessons for this from Owaisi and leaders of Muslim League of Kerala to move on the above said direction. One picture of Congress posters seen in the walls of HYD is the proof that there is a hidden agreement to handover Kashmir to Pakistan and Pakistan has already gifted PoK to China.


The work which is being done time to time by the enemies of India, the same duty is doing by Congress Party. Sonia Gandhi remain in power by hook and crook.


Ashoke Pandit @ashokepandit7h

Its only in India where Indians protect the enemies. Whether they are terrorists,Pakistan,Criminals,Underworld, etc.


When India was united ‘Akhand Bharat’ then neither Muslim nor Hindu word was communal. Every people of India were called ‘Hindu’ out of Hindustan. Neither Hindustan nor Hindu word was communal. Hindu dharm was different to Hindu, Hinduism and Hindutva. This has been even decided after full discussion by the Supreme Court of India.


Even at the time Mughal rule name of Hindustan was not changed. Hindu and Hindustan news papers are known Anti-Hindu. But they don’t change their name. So many in the name of ‘Ram’ and are anti-Ram of Ramayan. Did they change their name? Any person may have differences with his mother or father. Does this become the reason for changing the name or identity of parents?


Jinnah and Nehru made Muslim and Hindu words communal. Both spread the poison of secular word between both communities. Foreign funded Christian Missionaries and their media hided behind them in this move.


Blind race towards blind secularism


After Jinnah controversy Sudheerndra Kulkarni one time media chief of AdvaniJi and script writer of Jinnah episode for him, now on April 21, 2013 tweeted: AllamaIqbal‘s 75th death anniversary today: In 1904, he wrote “???????????????????????????/ ???????????????????????????????

He wants to say that we should celebrate the birth anniversary of Iqbal to be secular. When I tweeted to oppose this then he tweeted: We have to see the other side of Mohammed Iqbal what did Iqbal sing there after migrated to Pakistan:

“Muslim hain ham watan hai saara jahan hamara, Chin-o Arab hamara, Hindustan hamara:


Sudheendra Kulkarni@SudheenKulkarni

True, #Iqbal later became a votary of #Pakistan. But should we – and do we – Indians stop signing “Saare Jahan se achcha” for that reason?

Now these so called vatican burqa seculars make Hindu word communal. Did you not see the anger among them when Narendra Modi called himself Hindu and Hindu Nationalist?

Nehru and Jinnah both became secular after accepting the division of United India.

As AdvaniJi and JashwantJi our great leaders say Jinnah was secular. Like that Nehru became secular in India to say that he born in Hindu family accidentally. Jinnah made one Pakistan but Nehru sowed the seeds of many Pakistan even after the division of United India.  



Now in the leadership of Christian Sonia Congress is knowingly or unknowingly becomes the helping hand for the creation of Akhand Pakistan. This is the “Aman ki Shanti’ for them.


Government of India is planning to reduce Army presence along  sensitive routes in the Kashmir Valley, particularly the highly-permeable Rajouri-Poonch sector where annually there are nearly hundred infiltration bids as we seen on Aug 06 killing of our brave 5 soldiers. They question the rationale for reducing Army presence in a sector with maximum infiltration bids.


Sandhya Jain in his one article wrote that a national daily has reported that far from taking steps to scrap the deleterious Article 370 which has encouraged separatism, the Centre is planning to give Jammu & Kashmir even more powers, most notably, taking the State out of the purview of Article 356 which gives New Delhi the power to dismiss the State Government.


Such a suicidal step will effectively ‘liberate’ the State from Indian control. Should the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly vote for independence or joining Pakistan outright, New Delhi will be powerless to do anything. If the Army is withdrawn, secession would be even easier.


Now due to Omar Abdullah even our body security force has become the target of police of Omar Abdullah. Had not you seen the tears in the eyes of Omar, Farook, Gulam Ali and others after the hanging of Afzal Guru? The same tear were in the eyes of Sonia Gandhi to see the picture of encountering at Batla House. The same tears can be seen time to time in the eyes of these Vatican burqa seculars for the Ishrat and other terrorist.


This is going on since 1950’s from the Nehru time. We can know this truth to  read the book ‘In the Frozen Turbulence of Kashmir’ by Jagmohan (Former governer of J & K).


Now there is no use of shouting against section 370. Almost all kasmiri pundits got migrated somewhere elae & few are living like beggars in refugee camps in their own land


It is rightly said that BJP has to be at the centre of this new nationalist movement to integrate the all parts of the country all walks of life of India without differentiation and any type of appeasement as Modi and other CMs of BJP ruled states did. BJP has to work towards strengthen this movement by, for example, holding marches, rallies and public discussion about eliminating cast differences and uniting Hindus from all corners into one thread.


The work has to be relentless and not have selfish motives of power but rather of service to this great nation.


YahwantJi, SoniaJi knows, Congress is nothing, UPA is nothing, and NDA is nothing. Now there are Nehru Gandhi dynasty and BJP. Sonia Gandhi rules behind the door. Few shatrus of BJP want to hide behind the tallest leader of BJP to see some hope in future after five years. This ‘Panch varshiy yojna’ should be stopped. People are not happy to see this. Pt Nehru and his heirs remain always in power to divide people of India. Now Congress takes breath to see the disunity in BJP. People want to see united BJP united force of nationalists. How should it shape, question arises. We should think on it, we should act on it, nothing important more to this.


Latest Articles:


Aug 07

Antony in the roll of Krishna Menon and……

Nitish should seek pardon from Bihar Regiment and calling Suicide bomber Ishrat Bihar Ki Beti


Aug 06

Modi with Lotus Symbol: New Posters with New Slogan

Pak agrees to sale PoK to China for capturing Kashmir with the help of China

“Hear my Speech and fill your hungry stomach” –Rahul Gandhi


Aug 05


After Telangana Modi More Important in HYD on Aug 11

Muslim boy with Tail is worshiped: Gandhis born with corruption tail are worshiped!

Driver’s daughter for doctorate and Shweta of redlight area for studying psychology fly to the US


Aug 04

Dhoti-clad man stopped in Dubai Metro: Why we forget to wear dhoti?

See here slaps to dishonor Rahul Fatwas and Sonia’s….

Honest IPS Pankaj Transferred by Congress MLA to save Gahlot’s History-Sheet Gazi Fakir


Aug 03

Advani and Nehru lovers of English: Inclusive Personalities

Renounce defame writes letter on Durga, not Khemka: Flowing tears to see Batla Huse Pictures

Who wants in BJP to blow up blow-out fire?

Italians’ devotees after 64 terrorists launch tirade against Gujarat and Gujaratis


August 02

Durga Shakti awakes today Narendra Bhati’s brother to open Poll

Hamara choice (for PM) clears hai: Congress show its hand

Salman behind Indonesian Actress: UK visa cancelled: Will 64 MPs write letter to British PM?

Gandhi family’s backbone Owaisi and Muslim Leauge vs Nationalists

Zehra’s Biography 28 steps to reach the mosque took 28 years: Rahul‘s uncounted step towards marry…


August 01

AdvaniJi should give message of unity and discipline to BJP leaders

Rahul Fatwa: Don’t talk on Modi in TV without permission

Tilak icon of Unity gifted Ganeshotsav


Comment may be posted at:      


“Main purana johri hun..aur Natrajan 100% tunch maal” Diggi

Tags: Johri, Natrajan, Diggi, Tunch maal, Politician Digvijaya Singh, Jayanti Natrajan, Dance of Rahul Gandhi, Congress, BJP

Addressing a public rally in Mandsaur in Madhya Pradesh, Digvijaya, was in fact praising Natrajan’s work. “Main purana johri hun… rajnitigyon ki thodi si baat se pataa chal jata hai kaun farzi hai aur kaun sahi hai… yeh 100 per cent tunch maal hain.

(I am a veteran in politics. I can easily identify if a politician is genuine or fake by what they say. She is a 100 per cent sexy woman).

Digvijay Singh, a veteran politician and chief minister of Madhya Pradesh for 10 years, was speaking in Mandsaur when he praised local MP Meenakshi Jayanthi Natarajan. “She is very hard working. She has done good work in Mandsaur and has impressed people in Delhi too. Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi like her. Not only that, she is 100% tunch maal (100% sexy) ,” said Singh at a public rally.    
Jayanti Natarajan, 40, is one of the most promising young Congress parliamentarians. She has earned praise for simplicity grass root work and parliamentary work.

Singh often creates controversy for his statments–just on Thursday July 25 he claimed the Batla House encounter was fake despite a court judgment and accused (RSS)Rashtriya Swayam Sevak activists of making bombs–but gets away by clarifying that his views are personal. It remains to be seen how he explains his latest statement.

I have written too much about the woman hood of Congress. Should I write more? This womanhood job of Congress is continuing by Congress leaders themselves. Now one more personality enrolls himself in Congress of womanhood and Poor-hood.

Subramanian Swamy said, “Amartya Sen is not Indian. He had lost his Indian-ness after he left his Bengali ex-wife and married two foreign females. He has lived abroad and only visits the country for a couple of months, which cannot make you Indian.”

When Uttarakhand was facing flood havoc, womanhood was shown by Rahul Gandhi to go abroad most probably his girl friend’s Spain for haircutting and other important work.

Dance of Rahul Gandhi for womanhoodWe are a nation with short memory. So, Sonia said: ‘Cong is the most pro-women party’ Now his son Vice President of Congress Yuvraj talking of womanhood, increasing of women participation. 8 days abroad: Rahul has his hair cut and such things- Renuka Chaudhary

BJP Leader Vani Tripathi sexually harassed by five drunken men: Tribute of Congress to the womanhood

Gandhigiri Fatwa of Political Rapists”Indira Gandhi’ ‘Monkey sena’ was for getting freedom of India but now Rahul Gandhi wants to convert it in ‘Political rapist sena’. We hear every day about various types …”


Accursed & Jihadi Neighbur

Accursed (Sunanda) & Jihadi Neighb (Pakistan)

Language: English

Size: 9”x5.5”

Pages 202

Hard bound cover

Old Price: Rs.250- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

Revised Price: Rs. 150/- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

DLF-Vadra: Bhrasht Tantra: Book in Hindi

Language: Hindi,

Size: 9”x5.5”

Pages 100

Price: Rs 50 + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-


Printer & Publisher

Commercial Services

Behind Sindhi School,Ramsagarpara,

RAIPUR, C.G.- 492001, India.

Mo.No. – 09425207574


Read Book by clicking here: Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966


Supreme Court on Hindu Hindutva and Hinduism vs. Congress?


SC order on Hindu Hindutva and Hinduism

JUDGMENT : J. S. Verma J:



By Premendra Agrawal

JUDGMENT : J. S. Verma J:


    The next contention relates to the meaning of Hindutva and Hinduism and the effect of the use of these expressions in the election speeches.

We have already indicated the meaning of sub-section (3) of Section 123 of the R.P. Act and the limit of its operation. It may be said straightaway that any speech wherein these expressions are used, irrespective of their meaning, cannot by itself fall within the ambit of sub-section (3) of Section 123, unless the speech can be construed as an appeal to vote for a candidate on the ground that he is Hindu or to refrain from voting for a candidate on the ground of his religion, i.e., he not being a Hindu. We have also indicated that mere reference to any religion In an election speech does not bring it within the net of sub-section (3) and/or sub-section (3A) of Section 123, since reference can be made to any religion in the context of secularism or to criticise any political party for practising discrimination against any religious group or generally for preservation of the Indian culture.In short, mere use of the word Hindutva or Hinduism or mention of any other religion In an election speech does not bring it within the net of sub-section (3) and/or sub-section (3A) of Section 123, unless the further elements indicated are also present in that speech. It Is also necessary to see the meaning and purport of the speech and the manner in which it was likely to be understood by the audience to which the speech was addressed. These words are not to be construed in the abstract, when used in an election speech.

            Both sides referred copiously to the meaning of the words Hindutva and Hinduism with reference to several writings. Shri Jethmalani referred to them for the purpose of indicating the several meanings of these words and to emphasise that the word Hindutva relates to Indian culture based on the geographical division known as Hindustan , i.e., India . On the other hand, Shri Ashok Desai emphasised that the term Hindutva used in election speeches is an emphasis on Hindu religion bearing no relation to the fact that India is also known as Hindustan , and the term can relate to Indian culture.

The Constitution Bench in Sastri Yajnapurushadasji and Others Vs. Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya and Another, 1996 (3) SCR 242 held thus:

“Who are Hindus and what are the broad features of Hindu religion, that must be the first part of our enquiry in dealing with the present controversy between the parties. The historical and etymological genesis of the word Hindu has given rise to a controversy amongst Indologists; but the view generally accepted by scholars appears to be that the word Hindu is derived from the river Sindhu otherwise known as Indus which flows from the Punjab . That part of the great Aryan race, says Monier Williams, “which immigrated from Central Asia , through the mountain passes into India , settled first in the districts near the river Sindhu (now called the Indus ). The Persians pronounced this word Hindu and named their Aryan brethren Hindus. The Greeks, who probably gained their first ideas of India from the Persians, dropped the hard aspirate, and called the Hindus Indoi.” ( Hinduism by Monier Williams, P. 1)

The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. VI, has described Hinduism as the title applied to that form of religion which prevails among the vast majority of the present population of the Indian Empire (P. 686). As Dr. Radhakrishnan has observed: “The Hindu civilization is so called, since its original founders or earliest followers occupied the territory drained by the Sindhu (the Indus ) river system corresponding to the North-West Frontier Province and the Punjab . This is recorded in the Pig Veda, the oldest of the Vedas, the Hindu scriptures which give their name to this period of Indian history, The people on the Indian side of the Sindhu were called Hindu by the Persian and the later western invaders” ( The Hindu View of Life by Dr. Radhakrishnan, p. 12). That is the genesis of the word Hindu.


Then we think of the Hindu religion, we find it difficult, if not impossible. to define Hindu religion or even adequately describe it. Unlike other religions in the world, the Hindu religion does not claim any one prophet; it does not worship any one God: it does not subscribe to any one dogma: it does not believe in any one philosophic concept: it does not follow any one set of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not appear to satisfy the narrow traditional features of any religion or creed. It may broadly be described as a way of life and nothing more.

It had originally a territorial and not a cradle significance. It implied residence in a well-defined geographical area. Aboriginal tribes, savage and half-civilized people, the cultured Dravidians and the Vedic Aryans were all Hindus as they were the sons of the same mother. The Hindu thinkers reckoned with the striking fact that the men and women dwelling in India belonged to different communities, worshipped different gods, and practised different rites (Kurma Purana) (Ibid p. 12).

Monier Williams has observed that “it must be borne in mind that Hinduism is far more than a mere form of theism resting on Brahmanism. It presents for our investigation a complex congeries of creeds and doctrines which in its gradual accumulation may be compared to the gathering together of the mighty volume of the Ganges, swollen by a continual influx of tributary rivers and rivulets, spreading itself over an ever-increasing area of country and finally resolving itself into an intricate Delta of tortuous streams and jungly marshes… The Hindu religion is a reflection of the Composite character of the Hindus, who are not one people but many. It is based on the idea of universal receptivity. It has ever aimed at accommodating itself to circumstances and has carried on the process of adaptation through more than three thousand years. It has first borne with and then, so to speak, swallowed, digested, and assimilated something from all creeds”. ( Religious Thought & Life in India by Monier Williams, P. 57)

We have already indicated that the usual tests which can be applied in relation to any recognised religion or religious creed in the world turn out to be inadequate in dealing with the problem of Hindu religion. Normally, any recognised religion or religious creed subscribes to a body of set philosophic concepts and theological beliefs. Does this test apply to the Hindu religion? In answering this question, we would base ourselves mainly on the exposition of the problem by Dr. Radhakrishnan in his work on Indian philosophy. ( Indian Philosophy by Dr. Radhakrishnan, Vol. I, pp. 22-23). Unlike other countries, India can claim that philosophy in ancient India was not an auxiliary to any other science or art, but always held a prominent position of independence… “In all the fleeting centuries of history”, says Dr. Radhakrishnan, “in all the vicissitudes through which India has passed, a certain marked identity is visible. It has held fast to certain psychological traits which constitute its special heritage, and they will be the characteristic marks of the Indian people so long as they are privileged to have a separate existence” . The history of Indian thought emphatically brings out the fact that the development of Hindu religion has always been inspired by an endless quest of the mind for truth based on the consciousness that truth has many facets: Truth is one but wise men describe it differently. (…) The Indian mind has, consistently through the ages, been exercised over the problem of the nature of godhead, the problem that faces the spirit at the end of life, and the interrelation between the individual and the universal soul. “If we can abstract from the variety of opinion”, says Dr. Radhakrishnan, “and observe the general spirit of Indian thought, we shall find that it has a disposition to interpret life and nature in the way of monistic idealism, though this tendency is so plastic, living and manifold that it takes many forms and expresses itself in even mutually hostile teachings”. (…)

The development of Hindu religion and philosophy shows that from time to time saints and religious reformers attempted to remove from the Hindu thought and practices elements of corruption and superstition and that led to the formation of different sects. Buddha started Buddhism; Mahavir founded Jainism: Basava became the founder of Lingayat religion; Jnaneshwar and Tukaram initiated the Varakari cult: Guru Nanak inspired Sikhism: Dayananda founded Arya Samaj: and Chaitanya began Bhakti cult; and as a result of the teachings of Ramakrishna and Vivekananda, Hindu religion flowered into its most attractive, progressive and dynamic form. If we study the teachings of these saints and religious reformers, we would notice an amount of divergence in their respective views. but underneath that divergence, there is a kind of subtle indescribable unity which keeps them within the sweep of the broad and progressive Hindu religion.

The Constitution-makers were fully conscious of this broad and comprehensive character of Hindu religion: and so, while guaranteeing the fundamental right to freedom of religion, explanation II to Art. 25 has made it clear that in sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jam or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.”

(from pages 259-266)


In a later Constitution Bench decision in Commr. of Wealth Tax. Madras & Ors. Vs. Late R. Sridharan by L. Rs. (1976) Supp. SCR478, the meaning of the term Hinduism as commonly understood is stated thus:

“…It is a matter of common knowledge that Hinduism embraces within self so many diverse forms of beliefs. faiths. practices and worship that it is difficult to define the term Hindu with precision.

The Historical and etymological genesis of the word Hindu has been succinctly explained by Gajendragadkar, C.J. in Shastri Yajnapurushdasji & Ors. Vs. Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya & Anr. (A.I.R. 1966 S.C. 1119).

In Unabridged Edition of Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, the term Hinduism has been defined as meaning “a complex body of social, cultural and religious beliefs and practices evolved in and mostly confined to the Indian subcontinent and marked by a caste system, an outlook tending to view all forms and theories as aspects of one eternal being and truth, a belief in ahimsa, karma, dharma, sansara and moksha, and the practice of the way of works, the way of knowledge, or the way of devotion as the means of release from the bound of rebirths, the way of life and form of thought of a Hindu”.

In Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition), the term Hinduism has been defined as meaning “the civilization of Hindus (originally, the inhabitants of the land of the Indus River ). It properly denotes the Indian civilization of approximately the last 2,000 years, which gradually evolved from Vedism, the religion of the ancient Indo-Europeans who settled in India in the last centuries of the 2nd millennium B.C. Because it integrates a large variety of heterogeneous elements. Hinduism constitutes a very complex but largely continuous whole and since it covers the whole of life, it has religious social, economic, literary, and artistic aspects. As a religion, Hinduism is an utterly diverse conglomerate of doctrines, cults, and way of life… In Principle, Hinduism incorporates all forms of belief and worship without necessitating the selection or elimination of any. The Hindu is inclined to revere the divine in ever manifestation. whatever it may be, and is doctrinally tolerant. leaving others including both Hindus and non-Hindus – whatever creed and worship-practices suit them best. A Hindu may embrace a non-Hindu religion without ceasing to be a Hindu. and since the Hindu is disposed to think synthetically and to regard other forms of worship, strange gods and divergent doctrines as inadequate rather than wrong or objectionable, he tends to believe that the highest divine powers complement each other for the well-being of the world and mankind. Few religious ideas are considered to be finally irreconcilable. The core of religion does not even depend on the existence or nonexistence of God or on whether there is one god or many. Since religious truth is said to transcend all verbal definition, it is not conceived in dogmatic terms. Hinduism is, then, both a civilization and a conglomerate of religions, with neither a beginning, a founder, nor a cult of authority, hierarchy, or organization. Every attempt at a specific definition of Hinduism has proved unsatisfactory in one way or another, the more so because the finest Indian scholars of Hinduism,including Hindus themselves, have emphasized different aspects of that religion.”

In his celebrated treatise Gitarahasya, B.G. Tilak has given the following broad description of the Hindu religion:

“Acceptance of the Vedas with reverence: recognition of the fact that the means or ways of salvation are diverse; and realisation of the truth that the number of gods to be worshipped is large, that indeed is the distinguishing feature of Hindu religion”.

In Bhagwan Koer Vs.J.C. Bose & Ors., (1 904 ILR 31 Cal. 11), it was held that Hindu religion is marvelously catholic and elastic. Its theology is marked by eclecticism and tolerance and almost unlimited freedom of private worship….

This being the scope and nature of the religion,it is not strange that it holds within its fold men of divergent views and traditions which have very little in common except vague faith in what may be called the fundamentals of the Hindu religion.”

(at pages 481-482)

These Constitution Bench decisions, after a detailed discussion, indicate that no precise meaning can be ascribed to the terms Hindu, Hindutva and Hinduism; and no meaning in the abstract can confine it to the narrow limits of religion alone, excluding the content of Indian culture and heritage. It is also indicated that the term Hindutva is related more to the way of life of the people in the subcontinent. It is difficult to appreciate how in the face of these decisions,the term Hindutva or Hinduism per se, in the abstract, can be assumed to mean and be equated with narrow fundamentalist Hindu religious bigotry, or be construed to fall within the prohibition in sub-section (3) and/or (3A) of Section 123 of the R.P. Act.

Bharucha, J. in Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui and Ors. etc. Vs. Union of India & Ors. etc., 1994 (6) SCC 360 (Ayodhya case), in the separate opinion for himself and Ahmadi. J. (as he then was), observed as under:

“…Hinduism is a tolerant faith. It is that tolerance that has enabled Islam, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism to find shelter and support upon this land,..”

(at page 442)

Ordinarily, Hindutva is understood as a way of life or a state of mind and it is not to be equated with. or understood as religious Hindu fundamentalism. In Indian Muslims-The Need For A Positive Outlook by Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, (1994), it is said:

“The strategy worked out to solve the minorities problem was, although differently worded. that of Hindutva or Indianisation. This strategy, briefly stated, aims at developing a uniform culture by obliterating the differences between all of the cultures coexisting in the country. This was felt to be the way to communal harmony and national unity. It was thought that this would put an end once and for all to the minorities problem.”

(at page 19)

The above opinion indicates that the word Hindutva is used and understood as a synonym of Indianisation, i.e., development of uniform culture by obliterating the differences between all the cultures co-existing in the country.

In Kultar Singh vs. Mukhtiar Singh, 1964 (7) SCR 790. the Constitution Bench construed the meaning of subsection (3) of Section 123 prior to its amendment. The question there was whether a poster contained an appeal to voters to vote for the candidate on the ground of his religion, and the meaning of the word Panth in the poster was significant for the purpose. It was held as under:

“It is true that a corrupt practice under S. 123 (3) can be committed by a candidate by appealing to the voters to vote for him on the ground of his religion even though his rival candidate may belong to the same religion. If, for instance, a Sikh candidate were to appeal to) the voters to vote for him, because he was a Sikh and add that his rival candidate, though a Sikh in name, was not true to the religious tenets of Sikhism or was a heretic and, as such, outside the pale of the Sikh religion, that would amount to a corrupt practice under S. 123(3), and so, we cannot uphold the contention that S. 123(3) is inapplicable because both the appellant and the respondent are Sikhs….

The corrupt practice as prescribed by S. 123(3) undoubtedly constitutes a very healthy and salutary provision which is intended to serve the cause of secular democracy in this country. In order that the democratic process should thrive and succeed, it is of utmost importance that our elections to Parliament and the different legislative bodies must be free from the unhealthy influence of appeals to religion, race, caste, community, or language. If these considerations are allowed any sway in election campaigns, they would vitiate the secular atmosphere of democratic life, and so, S. 123(3) wisely provides a check on this undesirable development by providing that an appeal to any of these factors made in furtherance of the candidature of any candidate as therein prescribed would constitute a corrupt practice and would render the election of the said candidate void.

In considering the question as to whether the distribution of the impugned poster by the appellant constitutes corrupt practice under S. 123(3), there is one point which has to be borne in mind. The appellant has been adopted as its candidate by the Akali Dal Party. This Party is recognised as a political party by the Election Commission not with standing the fact that all of its members are only Sikhs. It is well-known that there are several parties in this country which subscribe to different political and economic ideologies but the membership of them is either confined to or predominantly held by members of particular communities or religions. So long as law does not prohibit the formation of such parties and in fact recognises them for the purpose of election and parliamentary life, it would be necessary to remember that an appeal made by candidates of such parties for votes may, if successful, lead to their election and in ail indirect way, may conceivably be influenced by considerations of religion, race, caste, community or language. This infirmity cannot perhaps be avoided so long as parties are allowed to function and are recognised though their composition may be predominantly based on membership of particular communities or religion. That is why we think, in considering the question as to whether a particular appeal made by a candidate falls within the mischief of S. 123(3), courts should not be astute to read into the words used in the appeal anything more than can be attributed to them on its fair and reasonable construction.

That takes us to the question of construing the impugned poster. The principles which have to be applied in construing such a document are well-settled. The document must be read as a whole and its purport and effect determined in a fair objective and reasonable manner. In reading such documents it would be unrealistic to ignore the fact that when election meetings are held and appeals are made by candidates of opposing political parties the atmosphere is usually surcharged with partisan feelings and emotions and the use of hyperboles or exaggerated language or the adoption of metaphors and the extravagance of expression in attacking one another are all a part of the game and so, when the question about the effect of speeches delivered or pamphlets distributed at election meetings is argued in the cold atmosphere of a judicial chamber, some allowance must be made and the impugned speeches or pamphlets must be construed in that light. In doing so, however, it would be unreasonable to ignore the question as to what the effect of the said speech or pamphlet would be on the mind of the ordinary voter who attends such meetings and reads the pamphlets or hears the speeches. It is in the light of these well established principles that we must now turn to the impugned pamphlet.”

(at pages 793-795)

The test applied in the decision was to construe the meaning of the word Panth not in the abstract but in the context of its use. The conclusion reached was that the word Panth used in the poster did not mean Sikh religion and, therefore, the appeal to the voters was not to vote for the candidate because of his religion. Referring to an earlier decision in Jagdev Singh Sidhanti Vs. Pratap Singh Daulta and Ors., 1964 (6) SCR 750, it was reiterated as under:

“…Political issues which form the subject-matter of controversies at election meetings may indirectly and incidentally introduce considerations of language or religion, but in deciding the question as to whether corrupt practice has been committed under S. 123(3), care must be taken to consider the impugned speech or appeal carefully and always in the light of the relevant political controversy……

(at page 799)

Thus, it cannot be doubted, particularly in view of the Constitution Bench decisions of this Court that the words Hinduism or Hindutva are not necessarily to be understood and construed narrowly,confined only to the strict Hindu religious practices unrelated to the culture and ethos of the people of India . depicting the way of life of the Indian people. Unless the context of a speech indicates a contrary meaning or use, in the abstract these terms are indicative more of a way of life of the Indian people and are not confined merely to describe persons practising the Hindu religion as a faith.

Considering the terms Hinduism or Hindutva per se as depicting hostility, enmity or intolerance towards other religious faiths or professing communalism, proceeds from an improper appreciation and perception of the true meaning of these expressions emerging from detailed discussion in earlier authorities of this Court. Misuse of these expressions to promote communalism cannot alter the true meaning of these terms. The mischief resulting from the misuse of the terms by anyone in his speech has to be checked and not its permissible use. It is indeed very unfortunate, if in spite of the liberal and tolerant features of Hinduism recognised in judicial decisions, these terms are misused by anyone during the elections to gain any unfair political advantage. Fundamentalism of any colour or kind must be curbed with a heavy hand to preserve and promote the secular creed of the nation. Any misuse of these terms must, therefore, be dealt with strictly.

It is. therefore. a fallacy and an error of law to proceed on the assumption that any reference to Hindutva or Hinduism in a speech makes it automatically a speech based on the Hindu religion as opposed to the other religions or that the use of words Hindutva or Hinduism per se depicts an attitude hostile to all persons practising any religion other than the Hindu religion. It is the kind of use made of these words and the meaning sought to be conveyed in the speech which has to be seen and unless such a construction leads to the conclusion that these words were used to appeal for votes for a Hindu candidate on the ground that he is a Hindu or not to vote for a candidate because he is not a Hindu, the mere fact that these words are used in the speech would not bring it within the prohibition of sub-section (3) or (3A) of Section 123. It may well be that these words are used in a speech to promote secularism or to emphasise the way of life of the Indian people and the Indian culture or ethos, or to criticise the policy of any political party as discriminatory or intolerant. The parliamentary debates, including the clarifications made by the Law Minister quoted earlier, also bring out this difference between the prohibited and permissible speech in this context. Whether a particular speech in which reference is made to Hindutva and/or Hinduism falls within the prohibition under sub-section (3) or (3A) of Section 123 is, therefore, a question of fact in each case.

This is the correct premise in our view on which all such matters are to be examined. The fallacy is in the assumption that a speech in which reference is made to Hindutva or Hinduism must be a speech on the ground of Hindu religion so that if the candidate for whom the speech is made happens to be a Hindu, it must necessarily amount to a corrupt practice under sub-section (3) or sub-section (3A) of Section 123 of the R.P. Act. As indicated, there is no such presumption permissible in law contrary to the several Constitution Bench decisions referred herein.








December 11, 1995

comment may be posted at:


Accursed & Jihadi Neighbur

Accursed (Sunanda) & Jihadi Neighb (Pakistan)

Language: English

Size: 9”x5.5”

Pages 202

Hard bound cover

Old Price: Rs.250- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-

Revised Price: Rs. 150/- + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-



DLF-Vadra: Bhrasht Tantra: Book in Hindi

Language: Hindi,

Size: 9”x5.5”

Pages 100

Price: Rs 50 + Courier Charges Rs. 50/-


Printer & Publisher

Commercial Services

Behind Sindhi School,Ramsagarpara,

RAIPUR, C.G.- 492001, India.

Mo.No. – 09425207574



Read Book by clicking here: Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966


Congress Corruption money abroad by Hawla through Hafiz Saeed?

Tags: Congress, Corruption money, Money abroad,Hawla through Hafiz Saeed,Congress, Terrorism, Geelani, Lashkar-e-Taiba

PM hawalabaazi comment linked as I tweeted on Feb 27, 2015:                            7:17 AM – 13 Sep 2015

@Swamy39 PM’s warning spooks ISI-linked hawaladars …         10:13 PM – 12 Sep 2015

During a debate on July 7 at India News former RAW officer RSN Singh made ??some revelations that will shake you up.

“India’s enemy No. 1 Hafiz Said is blackmailing Congress. Hafiz Said is the helping hand for sending the black corrupt money of Congress abroad by hawala. This is the money which is looted by congress. And return of this Hafiz Said is running his terrorist network racket in India without any resricion. Serial blast on Bodh Gaya is the concrete proof of this. Even after receiving the IB information nothing precautious was taken by Nitish Kumar government.”

(Ex-RAW officer Singh’s indirect finger was the black money collected in scams such as @G Coalgate, Railgate, VVip Choppergate, Jet-Etihad-gate etc.)

Is there any link of Ishrat Case? Investigating Agencies should look on this angle also.

Involvement of Headley in terrorism

Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, whom Gilani (headley) befriended.In exchange for information about his long-term Pakistani drug contacts, Gilani received a considerably lighter sentence than his co-defendant: fifteen months in jail and five years of supervised release. In November 1998, Headley was delivered to the low-security Federal Correctional Institution in Fort Dix.There, Gilani became an increasingly devout Muslim. In July 1999, months after Gilani began his sentence, his attorney, Howard Leader, requested permission for Gilani (Headley) to be given a supervised early release from prison so he could travel to Pakistan to be wed in an arranged marriage. Judge Carol Amon granted the unusual request.

While visiting Lahore, Gilani (Headley) was introduced to Lashkar-e-Taiba, an Islamist terror organization that would later launch a high-profile attack on the Indian parliament. Gilani made further trips to Pakistan without the knowledge of U.S. authorities, immersing himself in Lashkar ideology. He befriended Lashkar’s spiritual leader, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, and committed himself to the group’s war on India, which was supported by the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s premier intelligence service.


Described as perhaps the largest cross-border journalism collaboration in history, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) claimed to have laid bare the secrets of more than 120,000 offshore companies and trusts and nearly 130,000 individuals and agents connected to hidden dealings of politicians, con artists and the mega-rich in more than 170 countries, including India.

Who are the Indian Politicians, business giants of India in that list? Rahul Gandhi should throw some light on above to show his Mr. Clean image and also Mrs. Clean image of Sonia Gandhi via Mussoline Pope pact 1929.


Sonia Gandhi is wealthier than three time premier of Italy Berlusconi


Tax havens: Super-rich “hiding” $21Trillions

National wealth stashed away in tax havens: Court to Centre: are you sleeping?

A deafening silence on funny money – S Gurumurthy – 03-04-2009


Does India bring back black money from tax haven?

The documents, a series of top secret internal memos that have been in existence since the first quarter of 2011 but recently accessed by IBNLive, indicates that the government has reclaimed almost all of the black money lying in offshore tax havens – a staggering Rs 1412 lakh crore. This is almost 70 times higher than the figure of Rs 70 lakh crore put forward by a BJP think tank and crusader Ramdev in 2011.


Few passing London tourists would ever guess that the premises of Bulgari, the up market jewelers in New Bond Street, had anything to do with the pope. Nor indeed the nearby headquarters of the wealthy investment bank Altium Capital, on the corner of St James’s Square and Pall Mall.


But these office blocks in one of London’s most expensive districts are part of a surprising secret commercial property empire owned by theVatican.

Behind a disguised offshore company structure, the church’s international portfolio has been built up over the years, using cash originally handed over by Mussolini in return for papal recognition of the Italian fascist regime in 1929.


In April 1929, Mussolini was publicly praised by the Pope (Pope Pius XI) as a “man sent by providence” and the priests told their parishioners they should vote for Mussolini. Mussolini won 98.33 per cent of the vote.


Sonia’s father Stefano Maino was follower of Mussolini gave Sonia Gandhi Russian name Sonia’s father Stefano Maino was a follower of Mussolini. When he was in the prison of Russia, he fell in love with Russian culture and literature, government-run RIA Novosti reported pointing that all his daughters including Sonia (Antonio Maino) have Russian names and Sonia can also speak a little Russian. Quattrocchi Flied: India’s Sovereignty is mortgaged to Italy


Apart from the portrait, the other prominent feature of the dimly-lit front room of Maino’s house was the collection of leather-bound speeches and writings of Benito Mussolini. I looked pointedly at them. Without batting an eyelid, (Mussoline Pope Pact 1929) Maino declared his unwavering loyalty to Mussolini and Italy’s ‘admirable’ fascist past. The words streamed forth. The current Italian government was composed of a bunch of traitors who had betrayed Mussolini and the Fatherland. All the modern Italian political parties were hopeless, except the neo-fascist front. What Italians needed was compulsory sterilisation. Indira Gandhi smiled benignly out of the silver-frame. Nadia, Sonia’s petite and pretty younger sister, sitting beside her father, looked decidedly embarrassed.


That did not stop Stefano Maino’s frank and forthright expression of his views on life and politics. After all, he had proudly fought against the Russian Reds alongside Hitler’s Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front in World War II. The bold and direct manner of the soldier remained with him. I felt a tinge of sadness when this blunt and straightforward man died a few years ago. Perhaps, he is up there somewhere, directing his daughter to shed her self-imposed solitude and sophistry, and to launch a bold electoral blitzkrieg on the Indian people.


Monday Pappu’a chopper may land on Uttarakhand, Hindu Icon not allowed

Now Pappu’s chopper from abroad may land tomorrow on Uttarakhand to embrace his great Italian mother. There would be claim tomorrow that due their efforts without coordination of responsible authorities and CM and his cabinet, without taking the cooperation of opposition parties, banning of Hindu Icon Modi to enter Uttarakhand again, Italians have saved more than 50, 000. More than 5000 devotees have been lost their lives.


“If someone can put out such myths, I leave it to the people of the country, how reliable are their utterances and how profound are their achievements,” he said. The Information and Broadcasting Minister was referring to reports which said Modi, on his trip to Uttarakhand, had with the help of a team of his officials managed to evacuate 15,000 people from the deluge-affected areas of the hill state. 


PM Manmohan Singh has three loyalists in Punjab. One is Manish TiwariJi and other two are Ex-law minister Ashwani Kumar and Ex-Rail Minister Pawan Bansal. After the resignation of both ministers due to Coa;gate and Railgate, Tiwariji disturbed. Hiding of his boss aroad with his two bodyguard ministers has increased his trouble more.


PM, Sonia to make aerial survey of flood-ravaged Uttarakhand

Provide relief to flood affected areas: Sonia to Uttarakhand, HP CMs

See the attached photo version in which Congress CM Vijay Bahuguna refused to accept the material for the help of flood victims, CM wants only cash? Peoples don’t want to give cash because that may increase corruption and may be hided in Swiss Bank and other foreign banks. Govt should win the belief of people again. Govt has lost the belief of the people to see the series of corruption as the serial killers.


The same is happening with Digvijay Singh. Though in Pagthankot ModiJi in one point endorse the statement of Digvijay SinghJi. Narendra Modi said in the Pathankot Public Meeting” Two bosses run the country, don’t know who is genuine”

The  same  was  said by Dig Vijay Singh few weeks back: “the ‘two power-centres’ model which has been practiced by the Congress since 2004 has not worked well and suggested that the future leader of the party, Rahul Gandhi, should not outsource the job of the prime minister in case the Congress reaches a position to form the government again.”


While the Congress is wracked by a raging debate over the efficacy of its dual power-centre experiment, Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari has taken the diarchy debate a step further, saying the grand old party is run by a holy trinity. Giving a mythical dimension to the Congress’ iron-clad power structure, he said the troika of Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Manmohan Singh is the real face of the party. 


“At this time, we must help and evacuate people in the affected areas. This is no time to play politics. This is no time to project oneself,” said Congress General Secretary Digvijaya Singh.

He added that the Gujarat Chief Minister does not need to visit Uttarakhand to help people there. All VIPs with high security cover should not visit the affected areas and try to help people by other means.

Does it mean only Italians and devotees of 10 Janpath can go Uttarakhand and Hindu Icon Narendra Modi is banned for going there? Are they want to place this undemocratic, unconstitutional restriction on Narendra Modi to please anti-Hindus to play vote bank politics? Are they want to please Nitish Kumar and Lalu Yadav to do so? Are India and Uttarakhand is the property of Italians and their party? This should be immediately contradicted by the Congress Party and the government.

It is said that along with Rahul Gandhi his two so called youth friends Home State Minister R P N Singh and Defense State Minister Jitendra Singh has also flied to celebrate his birth day. Usually Rahul Gandhi celebrates his birth day in foreign land instead of the land of Hindustan, such as he celebrated his 39th birth day in Italy his birth place

The Right to Information reply from the Defence Ministry and IAF headquarters shows that United Progressive Alliance (UPA) chairperson Sonia Gandhi and her son Congress scion Rahul Gandhi have enjoyed joyrides in IAF aircraft and helicopters. Both Mother and son are not eligible to travel by IAF aircraft and helicopters not being eligible travel by IAF aircraft and helicopters….read more

Who are in the Congress in the line of Kalmadi now in IPL?

Tags: Congress, Kalmadi, IPL, Rajiv Shukla, Shashi Tharoor, Sanjay Dutt, Be corrupt and get promotion

Daily Bhaskar reported on May 19, 2013: The office of the prime minister has written a confidential letter to director of Intelligence Bureau Syed Asif Ibrahim asking him to submit a report on relations between Commissioner of Delhi Police Neeraj Kumar and IPL chief Rajiv Shukla. This involves the investigations into the ongoing spot-fixing case involving S. Sreesanth:

Under world and Pak link sent jail to Sanjay Dutt: Who would be in jail on spot-fixing?

Congress policy is “be corrupt and get promotion”. This happened in the case of Shashi Tharoor also. Shashi Tharoor was forced to resign in 2010 as minister of state for external affairs after allegations of a conflict of interest in promoting an IPL team for Kochi which was linked to the woman he married after quitting office, Sunanda Pushkar. 

In the same way Kalmadi also got promotion though he was accused in the corruption of 2010 Commonwealth Games.

Like that Shashi Tharoor also promoted and again took oath on Oct 28, 2012 as minister of state for Human Resource Development.


“After the alleged involvement of three cricketers in spot fixing, a strong lobby of cricket board has started exerting pressure on police to stop the investigations mid way,” Aaj Tak investigations head Deepak Sharma writes on his Facebook page.

The matter has now reached 12 Tughlak Road and a Congress leader has apprised Rahul Gandhi about the spot-fixing incident. According to sources, a lobby of Congress wants PMO to initiate steps to take the case from Delhi Police and handover the investigations to CBI as further investigations into the case may involve some ministers also and Congress cannot afford to have another Kalmadi-like incident before the polls.

Union Minister and Kerala MP Shashi Tharoor of Lalit Modi-IPL fame defend Sreesanth. Wants charges to be proven before Indian Cricket fans reach a conclusion.


After the Sreesanth-Harbhajan controversy, old foes, former IPL commissioner Lalit Modi and Minister Shashi Tharoor revived their rivalry on Twitter, with the former harshly criticising the latter.

The architect of the IPL, Lalit Modi in reply to one of his follower’s tweets, called Tharoor “Thief.Caught. Resigned. But rehabilitated (sic).”

When a follower alerted Tharoor to Modi’s tweet, Tharoor sprang to action by tweeting, “Yes, I could sue LalitKModi but the disgraced fugitive from justice would have 2 have the courage to return to face the courts.”

This seemed to spur Modi and he posted several tweets against Tharoor, telling him not to hide behind government machinery. “Come and fight clean. Let’s see how clean you are,” he tweeted.

In a subsequent tweet, Modi claimed, “It was his threat to me that morning, of saying if I discussed Sunanda Pushkar issue, he will have me raided.”

Modi also challenged Tharoor to take him to court. “At least he can officially disclose all the agreements about what he was made to resign over.”

Modi posted another tweet pointing to the former’s resignation, “If we all get scared of crooked ministers like shashitharoor, we are doomed. We all know he was made to admit in Parliament. Rest is history.”


Sudarshan channel reported: Has revealed an increase in spot-fixing case. There is also a connection in fixing Congress. The three men were arrested on Sunday the former Ranji Trophy player Manish Budewa includes them. According to police, the brother of Manish Singh is general secretary of the Youth Congress in Maharashtra.

Pankaj also fought elections in 2009 Brahmapuri. Delhi Police sources said Manish between 2003 and 2005 from Vidarbha has played Ranji matches. Manish 2000 Chandeela guilty cricketer Ajit knew and he used to practice with him. Sunil Nagpur relative of the local leaders. The BJP spokesman Shahnavj fixing in IPL unfortunate stating accused Hussein has vowed to take stern action

Comment may be sent at:


DLF-Vadra Scams building India and Bhart nirman through IPL


American Dead malls will reborn at Ram Lila Ground on Oct 28

Tags: American Dead malls, Malls reborn at Ram Lila, Ram Lila Ground, Congress , Congress led UPA, Sonia Gandhi

There will be a Sanjeevani bookti giving ceremony to the American dead Malls at Ram Lila Ground on coming Oct 28. These dead malls are going to reborn in India very soon, announcement of this has already done.


PM, Sonia to jointly address rally at the Ramlila Ground on Oct 28 to welcome American dead malls into India.


Please don’t worry to remember the midnight of June 4, 2011, when a huge team of 10,000 officers of the Delhi Police and RAF raided the ground when most of the Satyagrahis were sleeping on the and Ramdev baba was also sleeping on the dias along with his core group. A large police force lobbed tear gas shells and  lathi charge to evict the crowd from 1a.m. to 4 a.m. The tent was set on fire at many places. Cold water was thrown over power generators to create complete darkness to prevent any video recording of the whole attack. However most media persons recorded what was going on.


The rally which will be held on coming Oct 28 is not the rally of Ramdev baba or any other Ramdev baba like baba. This is going to organize for the PM of India Manmohan Singh and Chairperson of Congress led UPA Sonia Gandhi  by the Congress which ruled India now.


General Growth Properties, one of the largest mall operators in America with more than 200 properties in 44 states,filed for bankruptcy early Thursday morning. The company, which is saddled with more than $25 billion in debt, has been severely damaged by the recession as more retail tenants have shuttered. This was reported by New York Times’ opinion pages in a blog posting on April 4, 2009.

One of the largest mall operators in the nation, filed for bankruptcy early Thursday morning in one of the biggest commercial real estate collapses in United States history.


Despite bargaining for months with its creditors, General Growth faced dwindling options for handling its more than $25 billion in debt, largely in the form of short-term mortgages that will come due by next year. The company has been severely wounded by the trouble in the financial markets, which has wreaked havoc on its ability to refinance that debt.


As the second-biggest operator of malls in the nation, behind only the Simon Property Group, General Growth’s troubles have been closely watched by the real estate industry for months. Founded in 1954 and expanded through a series of acquisitions — topped by a $12.6 billion deal for the Rouse Company in 2004 — the company has a huge retail presence that has served as a barometer for the troubles bedeviling the American retail market.


As more stores have closed, mall vacancies are at their highest point almost a decade, according to Reis, a research company, which said the vacancy rate at the end of 2008 was 7.1 percent, compared with 5.8 percent at the end of 2007.


That has left many of the roughly 1,500 malls in the United States groping for a solution — any solution — to their woes. Some have converted retail space into office space. Others have drastically lowered rents for prized tenants, agreeing to cut deals to keep revenue flowing. Some have simply gone dark.


In its bankruptcy filing, General Growth said that it sought permission to retain a bevy of advisers, including the investment bank Miller Buckfire, the turnaround consulting firm AlixPartners and the law firms Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Kirkland & Ellis. The document was signed by Marcia L. Goldstein, the chairwoman of Weil’s well-known bankruptcy practice.





Why is BJP nervous on 116, not when 2

 Tags: BJP Nervous, BJP Nervous on 116, BJP not nervous, RSS, Hindutva, Dynasty, Congress, Jan Sangh

Hindutva is the ‘pran’ of Hindustan as well as BJP and RSS. Gandhi dynasty is the pran of Congress. Without pran there is no existence of life.

BJP can be called a party in indifference due to its Hindutva path

Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) was not nervous in i984 when BJP won only two seats, one winning candidate is Chandupatla Janga Reddy from Hanamkonda of Andhra and second is A.k.patel from Mehsana of Gujarat. At that time BJP leadership was concentrated itself on Hindutva to ride on the chariot. At that time BJP was a party in difference.

If a General knows his strength but does not know the strength of his enemy, his chances of winning the war are not guaranteed. BJP leadership showed his strength on 1992 and thereafter but between 2004 and 2009 they not only lost confidence on their strength to move as per the direction of the allies but also forget to know the strength of their opponents.

The statements of the leaders of Hindu Organizations such as VHP ideologically connected to BJP backfire sometimes when they do not fit in the policy frame of BJP allies. This difference between the statements of leaders of the BJP and their connected other Hindu Organizations’ leaders are exploited by their opponents who try to create confusion in 2004 to 2009 with the help of the Anti-Hindu Left leaning and so called pseudo secular media especially news channels maximum financed by International Christian Missionaries.

It is said that the support of the RSS is essential for the BJP to make electoral gains. This is the reason why the anti-BJP forces try to make a rift between the RSS and the BJP leaders.

What Perceptions of a difference is?

The care of party cadres and common people is essential to the success of BJP because it is a party in difference. This is not necessary for the Congress, life of which depends on the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. Roots of this dynasty right from berth and now are towards foreign (at present Italian) land and culture.

People and BJP cadres know when BJP leadership serves without caring. It makes a difference when they care to march on Hindutva path. BJP should be known as Jan Sangh was.

BJP’s cadres and common people are everyone, BJP leaders work, day to day, and live for them with them. Democratic government means: “Democracy is the government of the people, by the people, for the people” Abraham Lincoln

BJP leaders become people’s servant when BJP make a difference

The perception is the power to know to catch common wisdom and necessary needs of common people; approaching them with the ideology and common people oriented programs, impressed them, getting votes and support, peoples Care.

The support was lost by BJP leadership because of a negative perception of a difference that formed in their minds without their conscious knowledge or control. Going into the grip of Jinnah’s ghost through comrade Sudhir Kulkarni might be an example. President of BJP acted quickly on Yashwant Sinha, but takes sleep on the matter of Kulkarni. Perhaps in their eyes Kulkarni is more important than Yanshwant Sinha for the party.

Who can imagine the downfall of Madanlal Khurana, Uma Bharti, Kalyan Singh and others, when all were first in the rank after Advaniji.

Supreme Court has defined Hindu, Hindutva and Hinduism.

Congress is fully against Hindutva.


After Nehru Pranab Mukherji said in West Bengal in his election campaign that ‘Hindutva‘ culture did not belong to Bharat!!


According to them “Gandhi dynasty is India, India is Gandhi dynasty” as they said in the past “Indira is India, India is Indira”. According to them beginning of Bharat/Hindustan/India is from the birth date of the Nehru Gandhi dynasty.

BJP should not forget to do political cultural ideological pranayam.

BJP’s soul-searching meet begins on June 20:

Ayam means restrain or control .Therefore pranayam is a discipline to control th eventual life force through various breathing techniques.Jasswant Singh, Yashwant Sinha and now the letter of Arun Shourie are the example of breathing techniques of BJP.

After doing pranayama, the effects can be amazing .The Bengali poet and mystic, Shri Aurobindo, practiced pranayam for up to six hour per day. He then observed, ‘pranayam makes one’s intellect sharper and one’s brain quicker’. Initially he could write about 200 lines poetry a month . After mastering pranayam, he composed 200 lines in only half an hour. He commented,’…..poetry came like a river and prose like a flood..'(Diwarkar 1976:111-112).

By Premendra Agrawal


Read Book by clicking here:

Silent Assassins of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Jan 11-1966

Accursed & Jihadi Neighbour